PDF Downloads:
2949
Introduction
Consumer awareness and demand for safer food, free from pathogenic microorganisms, microbial toxins and chemical contaminants, as well as with lower amounts of synthetic additives, has been constantly increasing over the past few decades. In this respect, there is an increasing positive response of consumers toward “functional” foods or food components, which claim to provide health benefits beyond their basic nutritional value.1 A significant part of the functional food markets is represented by probiotics (a Greek-derived term meaning “for life”), which are foods containing live bacteria that can positively affect human or animal health by altering their intestinal microflora. The high nutritional value of fermented dairy products containing lactic acid bacteria such as yogurt, sour milk and kefir grains, is well established by scientific evidence.2,3 Many single cultures such as Lactobacillus casei, L. paracasei, etc. or mixed cultures such as kefir grains, with potential uses as starter cultures for dairy products such as fermented milks, ice cream and yoghurt, have been characterized as probiotics4,5,6,7. Many probiotic species have been identified in kefir grains, a natural dairy culture consisting of a symbiotic consortium of yeasts and bacteria, used for alcoholic and lactic acid fermentation of milk in the areas around Caucasus.8,9.10 Most of them are lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens.11,8,12,13 In addition, several studies have shown the presence of bioactive constituents (e.g. antimicrobial, antitumor, anticarcinogenic and immunomodulatory) in kefir grains.14
Regarding applications of kefir grains grains for ethanol and lactic acid production, cheese whey and molasses have been extensively evaluated as substrates.15,16,17 Discarded fruit and wastes of the fruit processing industry have also been proposed as growth media for kefir grains and baker’s yeast production.18 Fruit juices can also be used as fermentation media or as carriers for probiotics since they contain high concentrations of sugars, dietary fibre and other components of high nutritional value, such as antioxidant polyphenolics that make them easy to gain consumer acceptance.19,20,21 There is wide variety of ongoing research on fermented fruit juices such as beet,22 apple and orange,19 cranberry, lemon, pineapple, and pomegranate juices23. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), has been recently pointed out as a leader in the healthy beverage industry. Pomegranate fruit contain approximately 10% sugars (mainly fructose and glucose), 1.5% pectin, organic acids (ascorbic, citric & malic) and bioactive compounds (phenolics, flavonoids and anthocyanins).24,25 In comparison with grape, cranberry, grapefruit and orange juices, pomegranate juice exhibits 2- to 8-fold higher antioxidant capacity20 and at least 20% higher than red wine and iced tea.21 Pomegranate is native and widely cultivated in Asia, Southern Europe, Latin America and California, with a global production around 2 million tonnes. Pomegranate is also native in Greece and its cultivation is currently encouraged and funded by both public and private sectors.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the use of pomegranate juice, as single or mixed substrate with orange juice, for the production of a low-alcohol functional beverage through fermentation with kefir grains, and assess the viability of LAB during storage, in order to survey potential probiotic properties.
Materials and Methods
Microorganisms and media
Kefir grains were obtained from a commercial kefir product.9 For kefir cell mass production, cheese whey was used as medium, which allows growth in the form of small kefir grains easy to harvest.17 Growth took place at 30 °C without air supply or agitation to allow growth of both yeasts and bacteria. The produced kefir grains was harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and was used to ferment pomegranate and orange juices as described below. Cheese whey was produced in the laboratory from commercial cow’s milk. The milk was placed in a water bath at 37 °C and 0.1 g/l of rennin was added. After 1 hour the whey was separated from the curd by cloth filtration. Pomegranates and oranges were obtained from a local market in Orestiada, Greece. The oranges were washed well with water and the external yellow parts (exocarp) were removed. The remaining fruit were blended for 10 min, and orange juice was extracted from the pulp suspension by cloth filtration. Sterilized water was added to adjust the initial sugar concentration and the final juice solutions were used without further sterilization. Pomegranate juice was obtained by blending the seeds for 10 minutes in a stomacher blender. Sterilized water was added to adjust the initial sugar concentration and the prepared juice solutions were also used without sterilization.
Pomegranate, orange and mixed juice fermentation
The juice substrates used for fermentation by kefir grains were: (i) 500 ml pomegranate juice, (ii) 500 ml orange juice, and (iii) 250 ml pomegranate juice mixed with 250 ml orange juice. The initial sugar concentration of the substrates was 73-74 g/l. Amounts of 0.4 g (dry weight) of kefir grains culture were suspended in each fermentation substrate, into sterilized conical flasks of 1000 ml. The initial pH of the substrates was adjusted to 3.8 and the fermentation temperature was controlled at 30 °C. The fermentations were stopped when the alcoholic degree had reached a value between 0.5-1 %v/v which is acceptable for the characterisation of a beverage as low-alcoholic26. Three parallel fermentation batches were conducted for each different substrate. Samples were collected at various time intervals and analyzed for residual sugar and alcohol concentration.
Storage of the fermented juices
After the end of fermentation, the fermented substrates were stored for 4 weeks at 4o C. Every week of storage, samples were collected and analyzed for cell viability, ethanol, lactic acid and residual sugar concentrations. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and the results are presented as average values plus standard deviation to ensure the reproducibility.
Ethanol, lactic acid and residual sugar analysis
Ethanol, lactic acid and residual sugar concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography, on a Shimadzu HPLC system consisting of a SCR-101N stainless steel column, a LC-9A pump, a CTO-10A oven set at 60 °C and a RID-6A refractive index detector. Three times distilled and filtered water was used as mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min and 1-butanol (0.1% v/v) as internal standard. Samples were filtered through 0.2 μm microfilters, before injection. Ethanol (% v/v) and residual sugar (g/l) concentrations were calculated using standard curves. All results are presented as means of three repetitions plus standard deviation to ensure the reproducibility.
Microbiological analysis
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in the fermented juices were determined as colony forming units (cfu/ml). Specifically, serial decimal dilutions of the fermented liquids were prepared using 1/4 strength Ringer’s solution, and aliquots were spread on acidified MRS agar (Fluka, 69964). Growth took place at 37°C for 72h, anaerobically (Anaerobic jar, Anerocult C, Merk). The results are presented as means of log cfu/ml counts of the plates containing 30-300 cfu/ml. The initial added viable cell concentration for all the fermentations was approximately 8.0±0.2 log cfu/ml.
All results are presented as means of three repetitions plus standard deviation to ensure the reproducibility.
Sensory evaluation
All samples were evaluated (compared) by a panel of non-trained people after the end of fermentation and every week of storage at 4 oC. The results, based on a 0-10 preference scale, are presented as average scores plus standard deviations for aroma, taste and overall quality.
Results and Discussion
Pomegranate and orange juice as single or mixed substrates were fermented with kefir grains at 30 °C and initial pH 3.8, without addition of extra nutrients, in order to produce a low-alcoholic beverage using: (two fruit juices, well established for their high nutritional value and antioxidant properties, and (ii) kefir grains. with potential probiotic properties due to the probiotic species present in their natural microflora.
The first part of the experimental design comprised a set of fermentations of three substrates (pomegranate, orange, orange and pomegranate juices) that were carried out until an alcoholic degree of 0.5-1 %v/v was obtained as required for low-alcoholic beverages.26 The next set of experiments involved the preservation of the three fermented juices during storage at 4 oC that was evaluated through the changes in their chemical composition and the monitoring of viable cell counts.
The results for ethanol formation and sugar consumption during fermentation of the different juices at 30 oC are presented in Table 1. Plain pomegranate juice was more difficult substrate to ferment compared to orange juice or the mixed substrate as previously discussed.27 Sugar consumption was slow, and the maximum alcohol degree obtained after 20 h of fermentation was 0.3 %v/v. Comparing the three substrates, the most efficient results were obtained in the case of orange juice, with faster sugar consumption and maximum alcoholic degree (0.5 %v/v) reached at 16 h of fermentation. Even though plain pomegranate juice was proved not efficient substrate, the addition of orange juice to pomegranate juice improved the fermentation kinetics.
Table 1: Sugar consumption and ethanol production during fermentation of pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices, using kefir grains at 30 oC.
|
Substrate |
Fermentation time (h) |
Sugar (g/l) |
Alcohol (%v/v) |
|
Pomegranate |
0 |
73.3±0.1 |
0 |
|
8 |
70.1±0.1 |
0 |
|
|
10 |
67.4±0.1 |
0.1±0.02 |
|
|
16 |
63.1±0.2 |
0.3±0.03 |
|
|
20 |
60.6±0.2 |
0.3±0.02 |
|
|
Pomegranate/orange |
0 |
73.3±0.2 |
0 |
|
8 |
67.8±0.2 |
0 |
|
|
10 |
62.1±0.1 |
0.1±0.03 |
|
|
16 |
60.8±0.1 |
0.2±0.02 |
|
|
20 |
59.5±0.1 |
0.5±0.03 |
|
|
Orange |
0 |
74.0±0.1 |
0 |
|
8 |
66.5±0.2 |
0.1±0.02 |
|
|
10 |
60.2±0.2 |
0.4±0.01 |
|
|
16 |
58.5±0.1 |
0.5±0.01 |
|
|
20 |
56.3±0.3 |
0.5±0.02 |
Counts of viable LAB (log cfu/ml) during storage of the fermented juices are presented in Table 2. This determination was conducted because, in order for probiotics to survive the adverse conditions of the proximal gastrointestinal tract, they should be present in a product, claiming probiotic properties, at a concentration of about 106-107 cfu/ml at the end of product shelf-life.7 In all juices, the number of cells decreased after the first two weeks of storage, especially in the case of those with lower pH (Table 2, Figure 1). In the case of pomegranate juice this decrease was more rapid. The initial viable cells concentration was 8.32 log cfu/ml and the lowest remaining at the end of the storage period was 3.04 log cfu/ml. The differences in viable cell counts between weeks 0 and 4 are illustrated in Figure 2, showing that LAB survived better in the fermented orange juice. However it is noteworthy that the combination of pomegranate with orange juice improved the cell viability (75% survival) during storage compared to plain pomegranate juice (24%). These results are in agreement with previous works that demonstrated the antimicrobial properties of pomegranate juice due to the high amounts of components such as polyphenols and tannins.27,23 Another reason for the small survival rates may be the low pH of the fermented juices (Table 3).
Table 2: Viable cell counts (log cfu/ml) of LAB in the fermented pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices, during storage for 4 weeks at 4oC.
|
Storage time (weeks) |
Survival (log cfu/ml) |
||
|
Pomegranate |
Pomegranate/orange |
Orange |
|
|
0 |
8.32±0.3 |
8.51±0.3 |
8.38±0.3 |
|
1 |
6.28±0.5 |
7.08±0.4 |
8.71±0.4 |
|
2 |
6.44±0.4 |
7.77±0.2 |
8.15±0.3 |
|
3 |
4.80±0.5 |
6.49±0.3 |
7.42±0.3 |
|
4 |
2.04±0.4 |
6.48±0.3 |
7.57±0.3 |
 |
Figure 1: Survival of kefir grains lactic acid bacteria (log cfu/ml) in the fermented pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices during storage at 4 oC. Click here to View figure |
 |
Figure 2: Decrease of viable cell counts of kefir grains lactic acid bacteria (log cfu/ml) in the fermented pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices between the first and last week of storage at 4 oC. Click here to View figure |
Table 3: Residual sugar, lactic acid formation, and final pH, in the fermented pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices, during storage for 4 weeks at 4 oC.
|
Substrate |
Storage time (weeks) |
pH |
Total sugar (g/l) |
Lactic acid (g/l) |
|
Pomegranate |
0 |
3.15±0.1 |
59.6±0.2 |
0 |
|
1 |
3.26±0.1 |
55.4±0.3 |
0.1±0.01 |
|
|
2 |
3.19±0.1 |
61.5±0.3 |
0.3±0.02 |
|
|
3 |
3.08±0.05 |
63.4±0.3 |
0.5±0.03 |
|
|
4 |
3.11±0.05 |
63.9±0.2 |
0.9±0.02 |
|
|
Pomegranate/orange |
0 |
3.34±0.1 |
61.5±0.2 |
0 |
|
1 |
3.32±0.05 |
60.4±0.3 |
0.2±0.2 |
|
|
2 |
3.27±0.05 |
59.4±0.1 |
0.5±0.1 |
|
|
3 |
3.19±0.1 |
62.4±0.2 |
0.9±0.2 |
|
|
4 |
3.22±0.05 |
64.2±0.3 |
1.3±0.2 |
|
|
Orange |
0 |
3.45±0.1 |
58.3±0.1 |
0 |
|
1 |
3.41±0.05 |
61.4±0.3 |
0.3±0.02 |
|
|
2 |
3.28±0.1 |
63.4±0.2 |
1.1±0.02 |
|
|
3 |
3.34±0.1 |
62.1±0.1 |
1.5±0.03 |
|
|
4 |
3.19±0.05 |
60.5±0.3 |
1.9±0.02 |
Regarding the chemical compositional changes taking place during storage, small amounts of lactic acid (0-1.9 g/l) were produced after the 1st week and continued to increase until the 4th week (Table 3), indicating metabolic activity of the kefir grains during storage. Higher amounts of lactic acid were found in the fermented orange juice, which is consistent with the better survival rates of lactic acid bacteria in this product. These findings are in accordance with the results of another work suggesting that kefir grains, and especially Lactobacillus probably use the energy generated through this metabolic activity in order to maintain their viability.23 Despite the increase of lactic acid, the pH of the fermented juices decreased slightly over the four weeks of storage, probably due to buffering capacities of the substrates. The fermentable sugar concentration (glucose, fructose and sucrose) in all cases slightly increased or fluctuated during storage, indicating simultaneous utilization by kefir grains (in order to produce lactic acid) and production by enzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides contained in the juices.19,28
Table 4: Changes in the sensory evaluation scores of fermented pomegranate, orange, and mixed juices, during storage for 4 weeks at 4 oC.
|
|
Storage time (weeks) |
Aroma |
Taste |
Overall quality |
|
Pomegranate |
0 |
8.1±0.3 |
8.0±0.1 |
8.1±0.3 |
|
1 |
8.1±0.2 |
8.0±0.1 |
8.1±0.2 |
|
|
2 |
8.1±0.3 |
7.9±0.1 |
8.1±0.3 |
|
|
3 |
8.1±0.1 |
8.0±0.1 |
8.0±0.1 |
|
|
Pomegranate/orange |
4 |
8.2±0.2 |
8.0±0.1 |
7.9±0.2 |
|
0 |
8.2±0.3 |
8.1±0.2 |
8.2±0.3 |
|
|
1 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.1±0.1 |
8.1±0.2 |
|
|
2 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.2±0.3 |
|
|
3 |
8.1±0.3 |
8.1±0.2 |
8.1±0.1 |
|
|
4 |
8.1±0.1 |
8.1±0.3 |
8.1±0.2 |
|
|
Orange |
0 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.1±0.1 |
8.1±0.1 |
|
1 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.1±0.2 |
8.1±0.2 |
|
|
2 |
8.2±0.3 |
8.2±0.1 |
8.1±0.3 |
|
|
3 |
8.1±0.3 |
8.2±0.2 |
8.2±0.3 |
|
|
4 |
8.2±0.2 |
8.2±0.2 |
8.2±0.1 |
Finally, a preliminary sensory evaluation performed by non-trained testers (consumers) to compare the produced fermented juices in terms of aroma, taste and overall quality (preference), showed none significant differences between all the examined fermented juices, which in general were accepted from the panel.
Conclusion
Fermentation of pomegranate juice as single substrate or mixed with orange juice using kefir grains is proposed for a low-alcohol beverage production with high nutritional value deriving from both the substrate and the culture used. The suggested functionality of such beverage is based on the well established beneficial effects of pomegranate and orange juices, mainly due to their antioxidant properties, as well as the probiotic properties of kefir grains and bioactive ingredients found in kefir grains. The viability of LAB in the fermented products was preserved for 4 weeks at levels near to the limits set for products claiming probiotic properties. However, microbiological identification of kefir grains as well as in vitro and in vivo tests, are necessary for characterisation of such products as probiotics. Molecular methodologies are currently applied in our lab and the study will be continued and updated results will be presented at the near future.
References
- Ozen, A.E., Pons, A., Tur, J.A. 2012. Worldwide consumption of functional foods: A systematic review. Nutrition Reviews 70:472-481.
CrossRef - Bolla, P.A., Carasi, P., Serradell, M.D.L.A., De Antoni, G.L. 2013. Kefir-isolated Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis inhibits the cytotoxic effect of Clostridium difficile in vitro. Journal of Dairy Research 80:96-102.
CrossRef - Garrote, G.L., Abraham, A.G., De Antoni, G.L. 2010. Microbial Interactions in Kefir: A Natural Probiotic Drink. In: Mozzi, F., Raya, R.R., Vignolo, G.M. (eds.) Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Novel Applications. USA: Wiley-Blackwell Ames. p. 327-340.
CrossRef - Bekar, O., Yilmaz, Y., Gulten, M. 2011. Kefir improves the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Medical Food 14:344-347.
CrossRef - Cespedes, M., Cardenas, P., Staffolani, M.,Ciappini M.C., Vinderola, G. 2013. Performance in nondairy drinks of probiotic L. casei strains usually employed in dairy products. Journal of Food Science 78:756-762.
CrossRef - Homayouni, A., Azizi, A., Ehsani, M.R.,Yarmand, M.S., Razavi, S.H. 2008. Effect of microencapsulation and resistant starch on the probiotic survival and sensory properties of synbiotic ice cream. Food Chemistry 111:50-55.
CrossRef - Plessas, S., Bosnea, L., Alexopoulos A., Bezirtzoglou, E. 2012. Potential effects of probiotics in cheese and yogurt production: A review. Engineering in Life Sciences 12:433-440.
CrossRef - Kakisu, E., Irigoyen, A., Torre, P., De Antoni, G.L., Abraham, A.G. 2011. Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory profiles of fermented milk containing probiotic strains isolated from kefir. Journal of Dairy Research 78:456-463.
CrossRef - Plessas S., Alexopoulos A., Voidarou C., Stavropoulou E., Bezirtzoglou E. 2011. Microbial ecology and quality assurance in food fermentation systems. The case of kefir grains application. Anaerobe 17:483–485.
CrossRef - Zheng, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, J., Yang, L., Pan, C., Huang, Y. 2013. Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Tibetan Kefir grains Grains. PLoS ONE, 8.
CrossRef - Santos, A., San Mauro, M., Sanchez, A., Torres, J. M. & Marquina, D. (2003). The Antimicrobial Properties of Different Strains of Lactobacillus spp. Isolated from Kefir Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 26, 434–437.
CrossRef - Chen, Y. P., Hsiao, P. J., Hong, W. S., Dai, T. Y. & Chen, M. J. (2012). Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 isolated from milk kefir grains ameliorates experimental colitis in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Dairy Science Association, 95, 63–74.
CrossRef - Huang, Y., Wu, F., Wang, X., Sui, Y., Yang, L. and Wang, J (2013). Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp27 isolated from Tibetan kefir grains: A potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. American Dairy Science Association, 96, 2816–2825.
CrossRef - Leite, A.M.D., Miguel, M.A.L., Peixoto, R.S., Rosado, A.S., Silva, J.T., Paschoalin, V.M.F. 2013. Microbiological, technological and therapeutic properties of kefir: a natural probiotic beverage. Brazilian Journal of Food Microbiology 44:341-349.
CrossRef - Aggelopoulos T., Bekatorou A., Pandey A., Kanellaki M., Koutinas A.A. 2013. Discarded oranges and brewer’s spent grains as promoting ingredients for microbial growth by submerged and solid state fermentation of agro-industrial waste mixtures. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 170:1885–1895.
CrossRef - Koutinas A.A, Athanasiadis I., Bekatorou A., Iconomopoulou M., Blekas G. 2005. Kefir yeast technology: scale-up in SCP production using milk whey. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 89:788–796.
CrossRef - Koutinas A.A., Athanasiadis I., Bekatorou A., Psarianos C., Kanellaki M., Agouridis N., Blekas G. 2007. Kefir -yeast technology: Industrial scale-up of alcoholic fermentation of whey, promoted by raisin extracts, using kefir -yeast granular biomass. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 41:576–582.
CrossRef - Plessas S., Kourkoutas Y., Psarianos C., Kanellaki M., Koutinas A.A. 2006. Continuous baker’s yeast production using orange peel as promoting support in the bioreactor. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86:407–414.
CrossRef - Ding, W.K., Shah, N.P. 2008. Survival of free and microencapsulated probiotic bacteria in orange and apple juices. International Food Research Journal 15:219-232.
- Gil, M.I., Tomas-Barberan, F.A., Hess-Pierce, B., Holcroft, D.M., Kader, A.A. 2000. Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48:4581-4589.
CrossRef - Seeram, N.P., Aviram, M., Zhang, Y., Henning, S.M., Feng, L., Dreher, M., Heber, D. 2008. Comparison of antioxidant potency of commonly consumed polyphenol-rich beverages in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56:1415-1422.
CrossRef - Yoon, K.Y., Woodams, E.E., Hang, Y.D. 2005. Fermentation of beet juice by beneficial lactic acid bacteria. LWT- Food Science and Technology 38:73–75.
CrossRef - Nualkaekul, S. & Charalampopoulos, D. 2011. Survival of Lactobacillus plantarum in model solutions and fruit juices. International Journal of Food Microbiology 146:111-117.
CrossRef - Mirdehghan, S.H., Rahemi, M. 2007. Seasonal changes of mineral nutrients and phenolics in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit. Scientia Horticulturae 111:120-127.
CrossRef - Tezcan, F., Gültekin-Özgüven, M., Diken, T., Özçelik, B., Erim, F.B. 2009. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic, organic acid and sugar content in commercial pomegranate juices. Food Chemistry 115:873-877.
CrossRef - Foster, R.K., Marriott, H.E. (2006). Alcohol consumption in the new millennium – Weighing up the risks and benefits for our health. Nutrition Bulletin 31:286-331.
CrossRef - Mousavi, Z.E., Mousavi, S.M., Razavi, S.H., Emam-Djomeh, Z., Kiani, H. 2011. Fermentation of pomegranate juice by probiotic lactic acid bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27:123-128.
CrossRef - Mohammad, G.A., Andres, D.H., Klaus, D.K. 2010. Isolation of polysaccharides from pineapple fruit pulp and their enzymatic liquifaction. International Food Research Journal 17:193-203.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
