Close

Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science - An open access, peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of Nutrition and Food Science

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

Eating Habits and Diet Diversity of Saudi Arabia Residents during the COVID-19 Locked-down

Abeer S. Alzaben1, Alaa A. Al-Masud2, Reham M. Gaid2, Elham F. Almahmoud2, Abdullah F. Alghannam2, Arwa S. Altalhi2, Shaima A. Alothman2*

1Clinical Nutrition Program, Department of Health Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

2Lifestyle and Health Research, Health Science Research Center, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Corresponding Author E-mail: Shaima.alothman.pt@gmail.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.11.1.9

Article Publishing History

Received: 19 Dec 2022

Accepted: 02 Mar 2023

Published Online: 14 Mar 2023

Plagiarism Check: Yes

Reviewed by: Sepideh Hesami Iran

Second Review by: Srijan Goswami India

Final Approval by: Dr Norazmir Md Nor

Article Metrics

Views  


PDF Download  PDF Downloads: 760
Abstract:

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on overall health and well-being. Therefore, certain preventive measures may affect many lifestyle habits. This study aimed to explore the eating habits, food variety score (FVS), and diet diversity score (DDS) of adults residing in Saudi Arabia during the mandatory stay-at-home advisory for COVID-19. Methods: A cross sectional study was targeted adults living in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 lockdown (May – June 2020). An electronic self-reported survey was conducted through Research Electronic Data Capture (Redcap) distributed on social media platforms. The Arabic version of the questionnaire was previously evaluated for its reliability and validity. A total of 359 individuals who completed the food frequency questionnaire were included in the study. Diet diversity score (DDS) and food variety score (FVS) was calculated. Results: The study found that the distribution of FVS ranged between 4-27 food items. The distribution of DDS ranged between 3-14 food items. Income, working status, and living status were factors associated with the FVS and/or DDS. The majority of the cohort (>67%) had at least one snack/day and 3 meals/day. Conclusion: Diet diversity was acceptable among Saudi adults during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Age, sex, having children, marital status, education level, and income were factors associated with diet diversity and eating habits (having breakfast, skipping meals, and number of snacks).

Keywords:

Adults; COVID-19 Pandemic; Dietary intake; Dietary behavior; Saudi Arabia

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Alzaben A. S, Al-masud A. A, Gaid R. M, Almahmoud E. F, Alghannam A. A, Altalh A. S, Alothman S. A. Eating Habits and Diet Diversity of Saudi Arabia Residents during the COVID-19 Locked-down. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2023; 11(1). doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.11.1.9


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Alzaben A. S, Al-masud A. A, Gaid R. M, Almahmoud E. F, Alghannam A. A, Altalh A. S, Alothman S. A. Eating Habits and Diet Diversity of Saudi Arabia Residents during the COVID-19 Locked-down. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2023; 11(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/3TdEOGW


Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on overall health and well-being. Governments have taken several preventive actions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic (such as social distancing, lockdowns, and border restrictions). Therefore, many lifestyle habits may have been affected by these preventive measures, including weight gain and physical inactivity 1. Foods contain essential nutrients that plays significant role in the immune system maintenance and overall health. Specific nutrients (such as vitamins A, C, and D, and zinc) may play a role in preventing and treating COVID-19 1. Consuming a diverse diet is crucial for maintaining an adequate intake of essential nutrients, and evidence shows that increased dietary diversity is associated with an increased overall nutritional status 2.

Dietary diversity refers to a diet that contains a wide variety of food items and/or food groups measured at the household or individual level over a certain period of time 3. Diet diversity is linked to dietary quality under the premise that consuming a variety of foods increases nutrient adequacy 2. Diet diversity can be assessed based on the number of food items (food variety score [FVS]) or food groups (diet diversity score [DDS]) 4. FVS is defined as the number of food items consumed and DDS is defined as the number of food groups consumed 4. Recently, low dietary diversity has been observed in developed and developing countries, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic 5, 6. Different factors may influence diet diversity, including lockdowns, food availability, accessibility, and security 5-9.

Few studies have evaluated dietary intake, dietary behavior, and household diet diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic 5-11. In the USA, there was an increase in high sugar, snacks and soda, as well as an increase in the intake of fruit and vegetables during the COVID-19 pandemic 7, 8. In India, 34% had reduced household dietary diversity 12. In China, the overall household diet diversity was good during the COVID-19 pandemic 5. Lower dietary diversity has been observed in cities with higher COVID-19 cases 5. However, all studies have assessed dietary diversity in households, not at the individual level.

To our knowledge, no information is available concerning studies that have assessed individual dietary diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Middle Eastern countries. The aim of the current study was to descriptively assess the eating habits, FVS, and DDS of adults residing in Saudi Arabia during the mandatory stay-at-home advisory for COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Study setting and population

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia from May to June 2020, during the period in which the COVID-19 stay-at-home advisory was implemented. The study population was extracted from a larger study on the impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle and quality of life among people living in Saudi Arabia, which targeted adults living in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 lockdown 13. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained approval from the institutional review board (IRB #20-0142) at Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University. All individuals who agreed to participate signed an electronic consent form and had clear knowledge about the study aim; they were notified that withdrawal from the study at any time without any penalty is permitted.

Eligible participants were residents of Saudi Arabia who were 18 years and older, except for individuals who were diagnosed with or suspected of having COVID-19. An electronic self-reported survey was conducted using Research Electronic Data Capture (Redcap). The survey was distributed on social media platforms such as Twitter and through personal contact with the research group members. The first page of the online questionnaire briefed participants about the study, explained that they had the right to participate, could drop out at any time, and did not have to answer all questions. In addition, electronic informed consent was obtained.

Sociodemographic and anthropometric variables

In a close-ended questionnaire, participants were asked about their sex, marital status, educational attainment, work status, work type, number of children, monthly income, chronic diseases, lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, region of residence, smoking status, and COVID-19 diagnosis. Moreover, the participants were asked to write their age in years, weight in kilograms (kg), and height in centimeters (cm).

Dietary intake and eating habits

The Arabic version of the short food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), a self–administered questionnaire, was used to assess participants’ food consumption 14, 15. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire have been evaluated previously 14. The FFQ captured participants’ number of meals and snacks using multiple-choice questions. Furthermore, the frequency of food item intake from different food groups was assessed using an 8-point Likert scale. The responses were categorized and recorded as never, 2-4 times /week, 5-6 times /week, one time/day, 2-3 times/day, 4-5/day, and 6 times /day. One question was asked regarding eating habits: the number of meals and snacks consumed throughout the day during the COVID-19 quarantine.

DDS and FVS

The DDS of food groups and FVS of food items were measured using the FFQ data, as described in a previous study 4, 8. FVS was measured as the number of food items consumed using the FFQ 4. Food items were classified into 14 groups according to FAO: grains and cereals, pulses and nuts, roots/tubers, fruits, green leafy vegetables, other vegetables, eggs, meat and poultry, seafood, dairy products, oils and fats, condiments, drinks, sugar, and miscellaneous 16. DDS is measured as the number of food groups consumed 4. Furthermore, DDS and FVS of food groups/items were presented using tertiles: 1st quartile, 2nd quartile/median (IQR), and 3rd quartile 4, 17.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics (IBM, version 26). Sociodemographic variables are presented as frequencies and percentages (for categorical variables) or mean ± standard deviation (SD) (for continuous variables). Levels of FVS and DDS for participants’ scores were classified into low, medium, and high tertiles 17. Anything less than the 1st quartile score = low, from 1st quartile to 2nd quartile/median = medium, and more than the 2nd quartile = high FVS and DDS. The chi-square test was used to investigate factors associated with food variety and diet diversity levels. An independent t-test was used to compare two means. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Sociodemographic

Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of Saudi Arabia residents during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Overall, the study included 359 individuals: 83.3% were female, while 16.7% were male. The average of participants’ age was 34.41 (SD = 11.4) years and the majority (71.0%) were 18-39 years old. The participants’ mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.81 (SD = 20.0) kg/m2, where 37.5% had a normal BMI, 33.7% were overweight, and 24.4% were obese. Participants were mainly from the central area (70.2 %), followed by the western area (16.4%).

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of adults living in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 quarantine (n=359)

Variable n (%) Mean (SD)
Sex
Female 299 (83.3)
Male 60 (16.7)
Age (years) 34.41 (11.4)
18-39 255 (71.0)
40-64 98 (27.3)
65+ 6 (1.7)
Educational level
Secondary/Intermediate 39 (10.9)
Collage 230 (64.1)
Higher education 90 (25.1)
Height (m)1 1.62 (0.1)
Weight (kg) 1 43.30 (9.3)
BMI (kg/m2) 1 27.81 (20.0)
Underweight 15 (4.4)
Normal 129 (37.5)
Overweight 116 (33.7)
Obese 84 (24.4)
Chronic Diseases  
Yes 335 (93.3)
No 24 (6.7)
Living Area  
Central 252 (70.2)
East 22 (6.1)
West 59 (16.4)
North 16 (4.5)
South 10 (2.8)
Marital Status    
Married 198 (55.2)
Non-married 161 (44.8)
Whom they live with    
Alone 11 (3.1)
With someone 348 (96.9)
Have children    
Yes 175 (48.7)
No 184 (51.3)
Work status  
Work 213 (59.3)
Do not work 146 (40.7)
Monthly Income in Saudi Riyals 2  
5,000 or less 74 (24.7)
5,001-10,000  49 (16.3)
10,001-15,000 72 (24.0)
15,001-20,000 49 (13.6)
20,001-25,000 22 (7.3)
More than 25,000 34 (11.3)

1 n=344

Eating habits

During COVID-19 quarantine, the majority of participants reported eating two meals/day (n= 168, 46.8%), while 29.2% (n=105) consumed three meals/day. In addition, 67.7% (n=243) of participants consumed only one snack and 32.3% (n=116) consumed >1 snack /day. Regarding the daily eating pattern of participants, 67.4% (n=242) reported that they had breakfast, 61.8% (n=222) had lunch, and 71.0% (n=255) had dinner during the stay-at-home instructions.

Association between sociodemographic variables and eating habits

Table 2 represents the association between the sociodemographic characteristics and eating habits of Saudi Arabia residents during the COVID-19 quarantine. No association was found between the number of meals and the sociodemographic variables (*P>0.05).

Table 2: The association between sociodemographic characteristics and eating habits of adults during COVID-19 quarantine (n=359).

    Having breakfast Meals number Snacks number
N Yes
(n=242)
No
(n=117)
P
value
<3
(n=254)
≥3
(n=105)
P
value
>1
(n=116)
1
(n=243)
P
value
Gender       0.365 0.122 <000.1
Female 299 198 101 216 83 84 215
Male 60 44 16 38 22 32 28
Age       0.059 0.616 0.008
18-39 255 164 91 184 71 71 184
40-64 98 72 26 66 32 41 57
65+ 6 6 0 4 2 4 2
Educational
level
      0.029 0.808 0.855
Secondary/
Intermediate
39 22 17 30 9 13 26
Collage 230 150 80 161 69 72 158
Higher
education
90 70 20 63 27 31 59
BMI     0.028 0.772 0.486
Underweight 15 5 10 12 3 6 9
Normal 129 90 39 91 38 35 94
Overweight 116 81 35 85 31 41 75
Obese 84 60 24 55 29 27 57
Chronic
disease
  0.372 0.911 0.713
Yes 250 164 86 178 72 79 171
No 109 78 31 76 33 37 72
Area   0.544 0.920 0.274
Center 252 163 89 182 70 73 179
East 22 16 6 13 9 10 12
West 59 43 16 42 17 24 35
South 10 8 2 6 4 3 7
North 16 12 4 11 5 6 10
Marital
status
    0.215 0.292 0.015
Non-married 161 103 58 115 46 42 119
Married 198 139 59 139 59 74 124
Whom they
live with
      0.754 0.406 0.104
Alone 11 7 4 6 5 6 5
With someone 348 235 113 248 100 110 238
Have
children
      0.117 0.735 0.002
No 184 117 67 124 52 45 139
Yes 175 125 50 122 53 71 104
Work status       0.039 0.654 0.819
Work 213 153 60 147 66 70 143
Do not work 146 98 57 107 39 46 100
Monthly
income
      0.001 0.471 0.088
5,000 or less 74 43 31 53 21 24 50
5,001-10,000 49 33 16 37 12 15 34
10,001-15,000 72 45 27 51 21 20 52
15,001-20,000 49 36 13 35 14 11 38
20,001-25,000 22 21 1 10 12 7 15
More than 25,000 34 31 3 24 10 18 16

DDS and FVS

The distribution of the FVS ranged between 4-27 food items (Figure 1). The distribution of DDS ranged between 3-14 food items (Figure 2). The majority of participants (35.4%) had fewer than 10 food groups. Figure 3 shows the percentage of participants who consumed different food groups during quarantine.

 Vol_11_No_1_Eat_Sha_fig1 Figure 1: Distribution of food variety scores (FVS) of food items daily consumption during COVID-19 quarantine among adults (N=359) living in Saudi Arabia.

Click here to view Figure

 Vol_11_No_1_Eat_Sha_fig2 Figure 2: Distribution of diet diversity scores (DDS) of food items daily consumption among adults (N=359) living in Saudi Arabia.

Click here to view Figure

 Vol_11_No_1_Eat_Sha_fig3 Figure 3: Percentage of participants consuming each food group of adults living in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 quarantine (n=359).

Click here to view Figure

Association between sociodemographic characteristics and DDS and FVS

Table 3 shows the association between sociodemographic factors, the FVS, and the DDS. Individuals who lived with their families and/or partners had a high FVS. Income and work status were also associated with DDS.

Table 3: The association between sociodemographic characteristics and Food Variety Scores and Diet Diversity Scores (n=359).

    FVS   DDS  
  N LowN (%) MediumN (%) HighN (%)  (P) LowN (%) MediumN (%) HighN (%) (P)
Gender
Female 299 80 (26.8) 137 (45.8) 82 (27.4) 0.488 88 (29.4) 141 (47.2) 70 (23.4) 0.170
Male 60 15 (25.0) 24 (40.0) 21 (35.0) 15 (25.0) 24 (40.0) 21 (35.0)
Age
18-39 225 71 (27.8) 112 (43.9) 72 (28.2) 0.332 77 (30.2) 112 (43.9) 66 (25.9) 0.351
40-64 98 21 (21.4) 46 (46.9) 31 (31.6) 23 (23.5) 50 (51.0) 25 (25.5)
65+ 6 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 0(0) 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 0(0)
Educational level
Secondary/Intermediate 39 6 (15.4) 22 (56.4) 11 (28.2) 0.411 9 (23.1) 17 (43.6) 13 (33.3) 0.271
Collage 230 63 (27.4) 98 (42.6) 69 (30.0) 68 (29.6) 100 (43.5) 62 (27.0)
Higher education 90 26 (28.9) 41 (45.6) 23 (25.6) 26 (28.9) 48 (53.3) 16 (17.8)
BMI
Underweight 15 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7) 0(0) 0.142 5 (33.3) 8 (53.3) 2 (13.3) 0.422
Normal 129 39 (30.2) 50 (38.8) 40 (31.0) 40 (31.0) 52 (40.3) 37 (28.7)
Overweight 116 28 (24.1) 54 (46.6) 34 (29.3) 33 (28.4) 58 (50.0) 37 (28.7)
Obese 84 18 (21.4) 41 (48.8) 25 (29.8) 18 (21.4) 42 (50.0) 24 (28.6)
Chronic disease
Yes 109 30 (27.5) 43 (39.4) 36 (33.0) 0.348 72 (28.8) 120 (48.0) 58 (23.2) 0.325
No 250 65 (26.0) 118 (47.2) 67 (26.8) 31 (28.4) 45 (41.3) 33 (30.3)
Area
Center 252 62 (24.6) 117 (46.4) 73 (29.0) 0.524 69 (27.4) 125 (49.6) 58 (23.0) 0.458
East 22 8 (17.3) 11 (32.6) 3 (20.3) 9 (40.9) 8 (36.4) 5 (22.7)
West 59 18 (30.5) 25 (42.4) 16 (27.1) 18 (30.5) 21 (35.6) 20 (33.9)
South 10 2 (20.0) 4 (40.0) 4 (40.0) 3 (30.0) 3 (30.0) 4 (40.0)
North 16 5 (31.3) 4 (25.0) 7 (43.8) 4 (25.0) 8 (50.0) 4 (25.0)
Marital status
Non-married 161 49 (30.4) 65 (40.4) 47 (29.2) 0.216 51 (31.7) 73 (45.3) 37 (23.0) 0.455
Married 198 46 (23.2) 96 (48.5) 56 (28.3) 52 (26.3) 92 (46.5) 54 (27.3)
Whom they live with
Alone 11 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 0(0) 0.036 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 0(0) 0.063
With someone 348 89 (25.6) 156 (44.8) 103 (26.9) 97 (27.9) 160 (46.0) 91 (26.1)
Have children
No 184 53 (28.8) 74 (40.2) 57 (31.0) 0.195 56 (30.4) 82 (44.6) 46 (25.0) 0.749
Yes 175 42 (24.0) 87 (49.7) 46 (26.3) 47 (26.9) 83 (47.4) 45 (25.7)
Work status
Work 213 55 (25.8) 90 (42.3) 68 (31.9) 0.250 53 (24.9) 97 (45.5) 63 (29.6) 0.042
Do not work 146 40 (27.4) 71 (48.6) 35 (24.0) 50 (34.2) 68 (46.6) 28 (19.2)
Income (SAR/month)
<5,000 74 26 (35.1) 33 (44.6) 15 (20.3) 0.121 33 (44.6) 25 (33.8) 16 (21.6) 0.008
5,001-10,000 49 11 (22.4) 19 (38.8) 19 (38.8) 10 (20.4) 21 (42.9) 18 (36.7)
10,001-15,000 72 12 (16.7) 38 (52.8) 22 (30.6) 12 (16.7) 42 (58.3) 18 (25.0)
15,001-20,000 49 13 (26.5) 23 (46.9) 13 (26.5) 14 (28.6) 22 (44.9) 13 (26.5)
20,001-25,000 22 7 (31.8) 12 (54.5) 3 (13.6) 6 (27.3) 14 (63.6) 2 (9.1)
> 25,000 34 13 (38.2) 11 (32.4) 10 (29.4) 12 (35.3) 13 (38.2) 9 (26.5)

Discussion

This study aimed to explore the eating habits, FVS, and DDS of adults residing in Saudi Arabia during their mandatory stay-at-home advisory for COVID-19. The study found that the distribution of FVS ranged from to 4-27 food items. The distribution of DDS ranged between 3-14 food items. Income, working status, and living status were factors associated with the FVS and/or DDS. Approximately 30% of the participants skipped breakfast, and the majority (>67%) had at least one snack/day and <3 meals/day. Education level, BMI, working status, and income were factors influencing breakfast consumption. Sex, age, marital status, and having children were factors influencing the number of snacks consumed.

Diet diversity is a proxy measure of diet quality because it is associated with nutrient adequacy 18. One study showed that reduced diet diversity can be associated with reduced dietary adequacy and may lead to various adverse health outcomes, such as poor nutritional status 19. Adequate diet diversity is associated with positive health outcomes such as an increase in the level of antioxidants in the blood 3, 20. Strong evidence has shown the influence of nutritional status or dietary supplements on enhancing the immune system and preventing and/or treating respiratory infections or COVID-19 21-25. Furthermore, recent evidence has shown a positive influence of vitamins C and D in patients with COVID-19 23, 25.

Data regarding dietary diversity in Saudi Arabia are limited 16, 26. A study conducted among 1700 Saudi mothers found that more than 50% of the sample consumed at least five out of 14 food groups 16. During the COVID-19 era, few studies have assessed diet diversity at the household level 5, 6, 9-11. Household diet diversity were found to be altered in Iran, France, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, and Ethiopia during the COVID-19 outbreak 5, 6, 9-11. Unfortunately, limited data are available to assess diet diversity in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19. Therefore, we could not compare the results of the current study with those of a cohort study. In addition, we were unable to compare the diet diversity results to other studies that compared diet diversity per, during, and after the COVID-19 outbreak 5, 6, 9-11. This is because we assessed dietary diversity at the individual level, not at the household level.

Several sociodemographic factors may influence diet diversity, including level of education, occupation, income, and marital status 5, 6, 27. Two studies assessed the potential predictors of diet diversity during COVID-19 5, 6. In China, low diet diversity has been observed in areas with a high number of COVID-19 positive cases 5. In Bangladeshi, income and occupation are major determinants of diet diversity during COVID-19, which is similar to the results of the current study.

In the current study, around 30% of the participants had skipped breakfast during COVID-19 quarantine. In Kuwait, skipping breakfast was observed in 42% of Kuwaitis during the COVID-19 lockdown compared to 39% before lockdown 28. The current study found that skipping breakfast was associated with obesity, educational level, income, and not working. It has been demonstrated that skipping breakfast maybe related to lifestyle behaviors such as oversleeping or sleeping late, which were reported to be common during COVID-19 lockdown 28-30. In addition, skipping meals was also observed among young Saudi women during the COVID-19 lockdown 31. The current study showed that the majority of participants had less <3 meals and one snack per day. Having children, BMI, age, and marital status are potential predictors of the number of snacks; these factors were reported previously 32.

Although we found that food and diet diversity in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 was limited, the current study had several limitations. First, the majority of the study population was female and from the central region owing to the snowball sampling technique. This poses challenges in generalizing the results to the Saudi Arabian population. Furthermore, the current study did not compare diet diversity to before the COVID-19 quarantine. However, recent studies have assessed food intake and changes in dietary habits using a subjective perception of changing dietary habits or intake or household purchasing questions as a marker of changes in dietary intake 5, 7, 8, 31, 33.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the majority of the participants in the cohort had more than one snack per day but skipped meals. Diet diversity was acceptable among Saudi adults during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Age, sex, having children, marital status, education level, and income were factors associated with diet diversity and eating habits (having breakfast, skipping meals, and number of snacks). Further cohort studies are needed to assess other factors that may influence dietary diversity. In addition, assessing eating habits and diet diversity in the post-COVID-19 era is essential for measuring the long-term influence of COVID-19 on eating habits and diet diversity in Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their appreciation to all participants who contributed to our research project during the pandemic.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding Sources

This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R207), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

References

  1. Alzaben AS. The Potential Influence of Vitamin A, C, and D and Zinc Supplements on the Severity of COVID-19 Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes: An Updated Review of Literature. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science. 2020;8(3).
    CrossRef
  2. Arimond M, Wiesmann D, Becquey E, et al. Simple food group diversity indicators predict micronutrient adequacy of women’s diets in 5 diverse, resource-poor settings. J Nutr. Nov 2010;140(11):2059s-69s. doi:10.3945/jn.110.123414
    CrossRef
  3. Gómez G, Fisberg RM, Nogueira Previdelli Á, et al. Diet Quality and Diet Diversity in Eight Latin American Countries: Results from the Latin American Study of Nutrition and Health (ELANS). Nutrients. Jul 15 2019;11(7)doi:10.3390/nu11071605
    CrossRef
  4. Savy M, Martin-Prével Y, Sawadogo P, Kameli Y, Delpeuch F. Use of variety/diversity scores for diet quality measurement: relation with nutritional status of women in a rural area in Burkina Faso. Eur J Clin Nutr. May 2005;59(5):703-16. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602135
    CrossRef
  5. Zhao A, Li Z, Ke Y, et al. Dietary Diversity among Chinese Residents during the COVID-19 Outbreak and Its Associated Factors. Nutrients. Jun 2020;12(6)doi:10.3390/nu12061699
    CrossRef
  6. Kundu S, Banna MHA, Sayeed A, et al. Determinants of household food security and dietary diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr. 04 2021;24(5):1079-1087. doi:10.1017/S1368980020005042
    CrossRef
  7. Poskute AS, Nzesi A, Geliebter A. Changes in food intake during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Appetite. Mar 2021;163:105191. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105191
    CrossRef
  8. Sadler JR, Thapaliya G, Jansen E, Aghababian AH, Smith KR, Carnell S. COVID-19 Stress and Food Intake: Protective and Risk Factors for Stress-Related Palatable Food Intake in U.S. Adults. Nutrients. Mar 2021;13(3)doi:10.3390/nu13030901
    CrossRef
  9. Pakravan-Charvadeh MR, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Gholamrezai S, Vatanparast H, Flora C, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A. The short-term effects of COVID-19 outbreak on dietary diversity and food security status of Iranian households (A case study in Tehran province). J Clean Prod. Jan 2021;281:124537. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124537
    CrossRef
  10. Deschasaux-Tanguy M, Druesne-Pecollo N, Esseddik Y, et al. Diet and physical activity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown (March-May 2020): results from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 04 2021;113(4):924-938. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqaa336
    CrossRef
  11. Madzorera I, Ismail A, Hemler EC, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Nutrition, Food Security, and Dietary Diversity and Quality in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. Jun 23 2021;doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-1617
    CrossRef
  12. Jaacks LM, Veluguri D, Serupally R, Roy A, Prabhakaran P, Ramanjaneyulu GV. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural production, livelihoods, and food security in India: baseline results of a phone survey. Food Secur. May 13 2021:1-17. doi:10.1007/s12571-021-01164-w
    CrossRef
  13. Alothman SA, Alghannam AF, Almasud AA, Altalhi AS, Al-Hazzaa HM. Lifestyle behaviors trend and their relationship with fear level of COVID-19: Cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia. PloS one. 2021;16(10):e0257904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257904
    CrossRef
  14. H E. HEALTHY EATING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AMONG ARAB MUSLIM MOTHERS OF YOUNG CHILDREN LIVING IN THE US: BARRIERS AND INFLUENCES OF CULTURE, ACCULTURATION AND RELIGION. 2017;
  15. Gosadi IM, Alatar AA, Otayf MM, et al. Development of a Saudi Food Frequency Questionnaire and testing its reliability and validity. Saudi Med J. Jun 2017;38(6):636-641. doi:10.15537/smj.2017.6.20055
    CrossRef
  16. Ahmed AE, Salih OA. Assessment of the Minimum Dietary Diversity of Reproductive Women in Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2019;18(7):615-622. doi:10.3923/pjn.2019.615.622
    CrossRef
  17. Torheim LE, Barikmo I, Parr CL, Hatloy A, Ouattara F, Oshaug A. Validation of food variety as an indicator of diet quality assessed with a food frequency questionnaire for Western Mali. Eur J Clin Nutr. Oct 2003;57(10):1283-91. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601686
    CrossRef
  18. de Oliveira Otto MC, Anderson CAM, Dearborn JL, et al. Dietary Diversity: Implications for Obesity Prevention in Adult Populations: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 09 11 2018;138(11):e160-e168. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000595
    CrossRef
  19. Fanelli Kuczmarski M, Brewer BC, Rawal R, Pohlig RT, Zonderman AB, Evans MK. Aspects of Dietary Diversity Differ in Their Association with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in a Racially Diverse US Adult Population. Nutrients. May 08 2019;11(5)doi:10.3390/nu11051034
    CrossRef
  20. Narmaki E, Siassi F, Fariba Koohdani, et al. Dietary diversity as a proxy measure of blood antioxidant status in women. Nutrition. May 2015;31(5):722-6. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2014.12.012
    CrossRef
  21. Amrein K, Parekh D, Westphal S, et al. Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on 28-day mortality in adult critically ill patients with severe vitamin D deficiency: a study protocol of a multicentre, placebo-controlled double-blind phase III RCT (the VITDALIZE study). BMJ Open. 11 2019;9(11):e031083. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031083
    CrossRef
  22. Silverio R, Gonçalves DC, Andrade MF, Seelaender M. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Nutritional Status: The Missing Link? Adv Nutr. 06 01 2021;12(3):682-692. doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa125
    CrossRef
  23. Krishnan S, Patel K, Desai R, et al. Clinical comorbidities, characteristics, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients in the State of Michigan with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. J Clin Anesth. Dec 2020;67:110005. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110005
    CrossRef
  24. Demir M, Demir F, Aygun H. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with COVID-19 positivity and severity of the disease. J Med Virol. May 2021;93(5):2992-2999. doi:10.1002/jmv.26832
    CrossRef
  25. Sabico S, Enani MA, Sheshah E, et al. Effects of a 2-Week 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Recovery of Symptoms in Patients with Mild to Moderate Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients. Jun 24 2021;13(7)doi:10.3390/nu13072170
    CrossRef
  26. Alissa EM, Algarni   SA, Khaffji AJ, Al Mansouri NM.   Association of diet diversity score with visceral adiposity in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome      Human Nutrition   &   Metabolism      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2020.200116   2021;23doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2020.200116    lism  ,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2020.20011
    CrossRef
  27. Cordero-Ahiman OV, Vanegas JL, Franco-Crespo C, Beltrán-Romero P, Quinde-Lituma ME. Factors That Determine the Dietary Diversity Score in Rural Households: The Case of the Paute River Basin of Azuay Province, Ecuador. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 02 20 2021;18(4)doi:10.3390/ijerph18042059
    CrossRef
  28. Husain W, Ashkanani F. Does COVID-19 change dietary habits and lifestyle behaviours in Kuwait: a community-based cross-sectional study. Environ Health Prev Med. Oct 2020;25(1):61. doi:10.1186/s12199-020-00901-5
    CrossRef
  29. Okada C, Imano H, Muraki I, Yamada K, Iso H. The Association of Having a Late Dinner or Bedtime Snack and Skipping Breakfast with Overweight in Japanese Women. J Obes. 2019;2019:2439571. doi:10.1155/2019/2439571
    CrossRef
  30. Kant AK, Graubard BI. Within-person comparison of eating behaviors, time of eating, and dietary intake on days with and without breakfast: NHANES 2005-2010. Am J Clin Nutr. Sep 2015;102(3):661-70. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.110262
    CrossRef
  31. Al-Musharaf S, Aljuraiban G, Bogis R, Alnafisah R, Aldhwayan M, Tahrani A. Lifestyle changes associated with COVID-19 quarantine among young Saudi women: A prospective study. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250625
    CrossRef
  32. Si Hassen W, Castetbon K, Péneau S, et al. Socio-economic and demographic factors associated with snacking behavior in a large sample of French adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 03 15 2018;15(1):25. doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0655-7
    CrossRef
  33. Zhang J, Zhao A, Wu W, et al. Dietary Diversity Is Associated With Memory Status in Chinese Adults: A Prospective Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:580760. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.580760
    CrossRef


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.