Introduction
Fish are very highly nutritive food in the human diet. They not only the important sources of protein but also have many other essential nutrients like minerals, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) especially Eicosa Pentaenoic acid (EPA) and Docosa Hexaenoic Acids (DHA). PUFA plays an important role to reduce the risk factors that has been associated with several cardiovascular diseases.1 India is one of the mega biodiversity countries where among 765 freshwater fishes 450 are small indigenous fishes.2 They serve as the richest source of vitamin A, iron, protein and lipid.3 But fish may be considered as one of the most perishable of all foodstuffs therefore, their preservation becomes necessary for future use.4 Fermentation has been used for the preparation of flavored fish which can contribute greatly to the general nutrition of large populations.5 Sun-drying is also one of the most important traditional methods which has been used for centuries for preserving fish.6
Puntius sophore, commonly known as pool barb belonging to family Cyprinidae, order Cypriniformes. It is widely distributed in India, Bangladesh, China, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, Myanmar.7 It is a small indigenous fish species of Bangladesh which is an important source of micronutrients in the diet of rural small scale farmers.8-10 Fermented and sun-dried P. sophore is very popular among the common people of Tripura, Northeastern part of India. So, comparison between the nutritional value of fresh and processed (fermented and sun-dried) P. sophore is very important. On the other hand, fresh and processed (fermented and sun-dried) P. sophore is not normally consumed in raw form. Various cooking methods such as boiling, frying, roasting are applied to prepare them which have numerous effects on their nutrient content and organoleptic properties.11 The suitable cooking method minimizes the nutrient loss and also improves the digestibility of food.12
Thus, concomitant nutrient analysis of both raw and cooked form of fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore was performed to evaluate the overall diet quality of processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore.
Materials and Methods
Samples Preparation
Fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) sample of P. sophore had been collected from the local market of Battala, Tripura and kept in a plastic container. Fresh samples of P. sophore were washed with potable water for cleaning. The internal organs were removed and the fish was washed to remove the residual blood. The fish fillet was obtained by cutting the fish lengthwise along the backbone to obtain the maximum amount of flesh without including the backbone. The fillet was then cut into small pieces and thus prepared for cooking. In case of processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore, the samples were washed with potable water and cut into small pieces. Subsequently, the fillet of the sample was boiled in distilled water for about 20 minutes until the pieces were well cooked and tender. Deep-frying of all the samples was done using vegetable oil in a pot on an open flame at 240ºC for 15 minutes with occasional turning.
Analytical Procedures
Proximate Composition Analysis
Proximate composition analysis of cooked and raw sample of fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore was done in triplicate for moisture, protein, lipid and ash contents. Moisture content was determined by oven drying method at 105ºC to a constant weight. The crude protein content was determined micro-Kjeldahl method using Kjeltec machine (Tecator Kjeltec System 1026).13 Total lipid was extracted by chloroform: methanol (2:1) solvent system.14 The lipid content was gravimetrically analyzed. Ash content was determined by ignition of samples in a muffle furnace at 550 – 600oC for 16 hours.15
Mineral Analysis
For mineral analysis, fish samples were kept overnight in a hot air oven at 120ºC and then the dried samples were powdered in a mixer grinder and stored in aluminium foils. A microwave-assisted digestion procedure was carried out in order to achieve a shorter digestion time. 0.5 g homogenized powder were weighed and dissolved with 3 mL of 65% w/v conc HNO3 to microwave digestion under controlled pressure. After digestion, samples were cooled and diluted to 50 ml with Milli-Q water and stored in a refrigerator. Mineral analysis was carried out by inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) (Thermo Fisher X Series 2) and inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (ICP spectrometer, iCAP 6300 Radial, Thermo Scientific).16
Amino Acid Composition Analysis
For estimation of amino acid composition, Fish samples were homogenized, hydrolyzed with hydrochloric acid 6N solution at 110ºc under anaerobic condition for 24h. The hydrolyzed samples were neutralized with NaOH 6N solution and were derivatized using a kit (AccQ-Fluor Reagent, WAT052880, waters). The derivatized samples were injected in High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu LC 10AS) equipped with a C18 RP column and fluorescence detector (2475, waters).17 For the tryptophan analysis, minced meat was digested with 5% (w/v) NaOH solution for 24h and neutralized to pH 7.0 with a solution of HCL 6N. Tryptophan content was measured spectrophotometrically at 530 nm.18
Fatty Acid Composition Analysis
Total lipid of fish sample was extracted by chloroform: methanol (2:1) solvent system.14 Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were prepared by transesterification with boron trifluoride (BF3) in methanol from lipid fraction.19 The FAME was analyzed by injecting 1µl (30: 1split ratio) into GC-MS.20 The fatty acids were identified and quantified using a GC (Trace GC Ultra, Thermo Scientific) equipped with a capillary column (TR-FAME, 30m×0.25mm, 0.25µm film thickness) and an MS (ITQ 900, Thermo Scientific) attached to it. The individual constituents detected by GC were identified and quantified by comparing the retention times and peak areas to those of standards (ME-14-KT and ME-19-KT, SUPELCO Analytical).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 16.0 for windows (SPSS, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, USA). The data were analyzed to determine the descriptive statistics such as Standard Error of Mean (SEM), Standard Deviation (SD), Statistic Mean, Minimum and Maximum value and Ranges of variables. One way ANOVA and Duncan multiple test were done to test the significance using 5% level of significance.
Results and Discussion
Proximate Composition
The proximate composition of fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore and the effects of boiling and frying on their nutritional value are presented in Table 1. Significantly higher protein content (12.88%) was found in boiled sample of fermented P. sophore followed by 12.54% and 12.44% in boiled sample of sun-dried and fresh P. sophore (p <0.05). Significantly higher fat content (33.21%) was observed in fried sample of fresh P. sophore followed by fried sample of sun-dried and fermented P. sophore 32.61% and 27.64% (p <0.05). Moisture content was found to be higher in fresh sample of P. sophore which was reduced after sun-drying and fermentation process. It was found to be increased after boiling process. Increased ash content was noticed after processing of fish such as sun-drying and fermentation. It was reduced after boiling and further increased through frying process (p <0.05).
Proximate composition was performed to evaluate the nutritional value of fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore. The increase in protein content after boiling may be due to solubilization of some nitrogenous compounds.21 Fat content was found to be increased in fried sample of both fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore. This may be due to absorption of oil on the fish sample as water is partially lost through frying.22 Ash content was found to be higher in processed (sun-dried and fermented) sample may be due to remaining inorganic content as ash after the removal of organic matter by incineration.23 But through boiling because of volatility of the mineral elements at high temperature ash content was reduced.24 Water losses during sun-drying and fermentation process resulted in higher protein content of processed P. sophore.25 On the other hand, fat content was found to be reduced after fermentation process may be due to lipid oxidation which can cause degradation of fatty acids.
Table 1: Proximate composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Fermented) | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Fried | |
Moisture % | 78.42 | 76.52 | 55.41 | 64.32 | 68.7 | 59.36 | 67.21 | 73.54 | 65.23 |
Protein % | 9.85 | 12.44 | 9.88 | 11.45 | 12.54 | 9.87 | 11.6 | 12.88 | 10.23 |
Fat % | 22.35 | 20.11 | 33.21 | 26.46 | 23.54 | 32.61 | 18.94 | 17.68 | 27.64 |
Ash % | 5.66 | 5.12 | 7.75 | 8.77 | 6.52 | 8.99 | 7.65 | 6.33 | 8.41 |
The moisture contents (%); protein contents (%); Fat contents (%); and Ash (%) of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p < 0.05.
Mineral Composition
Minerals participate in human metabolism. Lack of essential minerals such as sodium, potassium, calcium, iron lead to improper enzyme-mediated metabolic functions and results in organ malfunctions, chronic diseases and ultimately death.26 The concentration of minerals are shown in Table 2. Sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, magnesium, copper, manganese, selenium were detected in fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore both in raw and cooked form. Higher level of Ca and Mg content was found in fresh P. sophore as these minerals may be released due to fish processing such as sun-drying and fermentation.27 On the other hand, processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore contained higher amount of Na, K, Fe, Cu, Mn, Se and this can be attributed because of increased dry matter.28 But cooking had some effects on mineral content which was observed in the present experiment. After boiling mineral content was found to be reduced, may be due to leaching of minerals into the boiling water but reverse was observed after frying. In fried sample of both fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) P.sophore mineral content was increased as dry matter content was high in fried sample.
Table 2: Mineral Composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Fermented) | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Fried | |
Na | 57.8±4.5 | 55.2±11.0 | 57.0±7.1 | 76.6±11.2 | 75.5±9.8 | 75.7±10.4 | 68.3±9.7 | 66.6±10.2 | 67.4±12.8 |
K | 197.9±28.9 | 195.0±12.1 | 197.4 ± 16.8 | 206.2 ± 17.4 | 205.6 ± 22.2 | 206.7 ± 19.0 | 187.6 ± 14.3 | 184.2 ± 10.1 | 186.7 ± 13.7 |
Ca | 944.6 ± 55.4 | 940.3 ± 24.9 | 942.7 ± 26.3 | 841.3 ± 32.4 | 838.8 ± 12.1 | 840.1 ± 22.6 | 684.5 ± 19.5 | 679.3 ± 22.2 | 681.6 ± 18.7 |
Mg | 37.8 ± 1.1 | 36.6 ± 2.5 | 37.3 ± 3.8 | 32.1 ± 9.1 | 31.2 ± 3.7 | 31.9 ± 6.4 | 28.8 ± 4.6 | 27.6 ± 9.2 | 28.7 ± 6.6 |
Fe | 11.6 ± 3.6 | 11.2 ± 2.0 | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 76.6 ± 11.2 | 75.5 ± 9.8 | 76.2 ± 6.4 | 68.3 ± 9.7 | 67.6 ± 10.2 | 68.0 ± 8.8 |
Cu | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | NDL | 0.1 ± 0.0 | NDL | NDL | NDL | NDL | NDL |
Mn | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.6 |
Se | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | NDL | 0.8 ± 0.7 | NDL | NDL | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
*NDL: Not Detectable Level
The values are expressed as mg/100g wet weight. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p <0.05.
Amino Acid Composition
The method used in this study allowed the analysis of 15 essential amino acids and 3 nonessential amino acids. The amino acid profile of fresh and processed P. sophore and the effects of boiling and frying on their amino acid content are presented in Table 3. The major component of fish protein was aspartic acid in fresh P. sophore followed by serine in sun-dried and fermented P. sophore. Arginine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tyrosine, Valine, Tryptophan, Cysteine, Glutamic acid, Glycine and Proline were present as essential amino acid (EAA). More specifically leucine a prominent EAA and its content was (7.1±0.7) in fresh P. sophore, (6.1±0.1) in sun-dried P. sophore, (5.8±0.6) in fermented P. sophore. On the other hand, Alanine, Aspartic acid and Serine are considered nonessential amino acid (NEAA). Aspartic acid was the highest (11.4±2.1) in fresh P. sophore, (9.6±1.2) in sun-dried P. sophore and (10.9±2.2) in fermented P. sophore.
Cysteine was not detectable in both boiled and fried sample of fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore because of heating process that causes excessive denaturation of protein and destruction of amino acid.29
Different types of fish processing techniques such as drying, fermentation, sun-drying leads to the formation of different inter and intra-molecular bonds. As a result, protein chains unfold and free carboxylic and amino groups are exposed.30
On the other hand, there was a progressive reduction in the amino acid content was observed from raw to boiled and raw to fried. In case of fried sample of both fresh and processed fish sample of P. sophore, Maillard reaction may take place which leads to an interaction between the carbonyl group of a reducing sugar and the free amino group from an amino acid or protein. The resulting condensation product is then converted to 1-deoxy-2 ketosyl compound.31
Table 3: Amino Acid Composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Fermented) | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Fried | |
Arg | 4.6±0.6 | 4.2±0.2 | 4.0±0.1 | 3.6±0.2 | 2.5±0.8 | 1.7±0.4 | 3.3±0.7 | 2.6±0.2 | 1.4±0.8 |
His | 4.1±0.5 | 4.0±0.1 | 3.4±0.8 | 2.2±0.4 | 1.6±0.2 | 1.0±0.0 | 2.6±0.3 | 2.2±0.1 | 1.7±0.7 |
Iso | 5.4±0.4 | 5.3±0.9 | 4.7±0.3 | 4.3±0.4 | 3.8±0.1 | 2.1±0.6 | 3.5±0.5 | 2.3±0.2 | 1.6±0.7 |
Leu | 7.1±0.7 | 6.6±0.5 | 5.3±0.8 | 6.1±0.1 | 5.9±0.7 | 4.2±0.4 | 5.8±0.6 | 4.6±0.2 | 2.7±0.6 |
Lys | 2.6±0.0 | 2.0±0.7 | 1.4±0.3 | 3.8±0.7 | 2.1±0.2 | 1.4±0.8 | 3.5±0.2 | 2.1±0.8 | 1.2±0.3 |
Met | 2.1±0.2 | 2.0±0.7 | 1.4±0.3 | 2.8±0.7 | 2.0±0.2 | 1.6±0.6 | 2.5±0.2 | 2.1±0.8 | 1.2±0.3 |
Phe | 4.6±0.6 | 4.0±0.7 | 3.4±0.3 | 2.8±0.7 | 2.4±0.2 | 1.7±0.8 | 2.5±0.2 | 1.1±0.8 | 0.7±0.3 |
Thr | 5.2±0.7 | 5.0±0.4 | 4.4±0.3 | 4.8±0.7 | 4.2±0.2 | 3.4±0.2 | 4.5±0.2 | 3.1±0.2 | 0.7±0.3 |
Tyr | 4.6±0.6 | 4.2±0.0 | 2.0±0.1 | 3.6±0.2 | 2.5±0.8 | 1.7±0.4 | 3.3±0.7 | 1.6±0.2 | 0.4±0.0 |
Val | 4.1±0.0 | 3.0±0.1 | 2.4±0.8 | 3.2±0.4 | 2.6±0.2 | 1.0±0.0 | 3.6±0.3 | 2.2±0.1 | 0.7±0.0 |
Trp | 5.4±0.4 | 4.3±0.5 | 2.7±0.3 | 4.3±0.2 | 3.8±0.1 | 2.1±0.6 | 4.5±0.5 | 2.3±0.2 | 0.6±0.0 |
Cys | 1.1±0.2 | NDL | NDL | 0.9±0.1 | NDL | NDL | 0.8±0.0 | NDL | NDL |
Glu | 3.1±0.2 | 3.0±0.1 | 2.4±0.8 | 2.2±0.4 | 1.6±0.2 | 0.7±0.0 | 2.6±0.3 | 1.2±0.1 | 0.7±0.0 |
Gly | 4.1±0.2 | 4.0±0.1 | 2.4±0.4 | 3.2±0.2 | 2.1±0.3 | 0.7±0.0 | 3.6±0.2 | 1.2±0.1 | 0.4±0.0 |
Pro | 2.1±0.3 | 2.0±0.1 | 1.4±0.6 | 1.2±0.4 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.9±0.0 | 1.6±0.3 | 1.2±0.2 | 0.5±0.0 |
Ala | 5.9±1.5 | 5.2±1.2 | 4.4±1.1 | 6.3±0.6 | 5.7±1.0 | 5.6±0.9 | 7.4±1.8 | 6.2±1.7 | 5.2±0.8 |
Asp | 11.4±2.1 | 10.7±0.8 | 8.8±1.6 | 9.6±1.2 | 8.2±1.2 | 7.7±0.7 | 10.9±2.2 | 7.2±2.1 | 4.2±0.9 |
Ser | 6.4±1.4 | 4.2±0.8 | 3.8±0.3 | 7.2±0.4 | 6.6±1.3 | 5.3±0.6 | 8.5±1.5 | 8.8±2.0 | 7.6±0.8 |
*NDL: Not Detectable Level
The values are expressed as Xg of specific amino acid is present in 100g of protein sample. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p <0.05
Fatty Acid Composition
In case of fatty acid content, it was observed that after boiling fatty acid content reduced and through frying fatty acid content was increased (p <0.05). Fatty acid composition of fresh and processed P. sophore and effects of boiling and frying on them are represented in Table 4-6. Most abundant fatty acids present in both fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore were saturated fatty acids (SFA) 36.1mg/100g, 35.2mg/100g, 35.9mg/100g followed by polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) 28.4 mg/100g, 23.3mg/100g, 22.5mg/100g and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) 24.5mg/100g, 22.1mg/100g, 20.6mg/100g Palmitic acid (C16:0) was the dominant fatty acid in saturated fatty acids. Results showed that MUFA was dominated by oleic acid in both fresh and processed P. sophore. The dominant fatty acid in the PUFA group are linoleic acid (C18:2) as the omega-6 fatty acid. Results also showed that ω-3 content was higher than the ω-6 content in case of fresh, sun-dried and fermented sample of P. sophore.
All the fatty acid content was found to be reduced after sun-drying and fermentation process. Extractability of the lipids may be affected by the changes in the protein-lipid complexes in the fish tissues which results in bound lipids being released as free lipids during processing32. On the other hand, boiling and frying had some effects on fatty acid content. After boiling level of fatty acids were decreased because of leaching of fat in water32 but reverse was observed in fried sample because of oil penetration on the food after water is partially lost by evaporation33. The ratio of ω3/ω6 fatty acids has been suggested as a useful indicator of the relative nutritional values of fish oils34. According to current WHO recommendations, the daily ratio of total ω3/ω6 should not be higher than 1.5. In our present experiment, ω3/ω6 ratio in fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore was 1.3, 1.1 and 1.07. But cooking method did not cause any significant effect in this ratio.
Table 4: Saturated Fatty Acid (SFA) Composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Fermented) | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fermented)-Fried | |
C12 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.7±0.2 | 0.5±0.0 | 1.2±0.4 | 0.7±0.7 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.0 |
C13 | 1.1±0.1 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.4±0.6 | 1.1±0.4 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.7±0.0 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.2±0.1 | 1.7±0.7 |
C14 | 2.4±0.2 | 2.2±0.7 | 2.7±0.3 | 2.3±0.2 | 1.8±0.1 | 2.1±0.6 | 2.5±0.5 | 2.3±0.2 | 0.6±0.0 |
C15 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.0±0.5 | 1.3±0.8 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.9±0.3 | 1.2±0.4 | 0.8±0.0 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.7±0.1 |
C16 | 28.2±3.2 | 27.0±2.7 | 29.4±3.3 | 26.8±4.7 | 25.2±1.2 | 28.4±2.8 | 28.5±4.2 | 26.1±1.8 | 28.2±2.4 |
C17 | 1.2±0.4 | 1.0±0.4 | 1.4±0.1 | 1.6±0.2 | 1.2±0.2 | 1.8±0.4 | 1.5±0.2 | 1.1±0.8 | 1.2±0.3 |
C18 | 11.6±1.8 | 10.0±0.7 | 12.4±4.3 | 10.8±2.7 | 10.2±1.2 | 11.4±3.8 | 10.5±1.7 | 10.1±2.5 | 10.8±2.8 |
C19 | 0.6±0.0 | – | 0.8±0.1 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.7±0.4 | 0.3±0.0 | – | 0.4±0.0 |
C20 | 0.2±0.0 | – | 0.4±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | – | 0.6±0.0 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 |
C22 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.3±0.2 | 0.6±0.3 |
ΣSFA | 36.1 | 32.5 | 38.4 | 35.2 | 33.6 | 36.1 | 35.9 | 34.7 | 36.1 |
‘-‘represented not found any significant result
The values are expressed, as mg of specific fatty acid is present in 100g of fish sample. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p <0.05.
Table 5: Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Feremented) | Puntius sophore (Feremented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Feremented)-Fried | |
C16:1 | 1.5±0.2 | 1.3±0.7 | 1.4±0.4 | 1.8±0.4 | 1.2±0.2 | 1.4±0.8 | 1.5±0.2 | 1.1±0.8 | 1.2±0.3 |
C17:1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.8±0.3 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.7±0.3 |
C18:1 | 10.6±2.0 | 10.0±0.7 | 11.4±2.5 | 9.8±1.7 | 9.2±1.4 | 10.4±1.8 | 8.5±4.4 | 8.1±2.8 | 8.8±1.5 |
C20:1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.7±0.4 | 0.5±0.3 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 |
C22:1 | 0.42±0.1 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.48±0.1 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.4±0.0 |
ΣMUFA | 24.5 | 24.9 | 25.2 | 22.1 | 21.8 | 23.4 | 20.6 | 20.1 | 21.5 |
The values are expressed, as mg of specific fatty acid is present in 100 g of fish sample. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p <0.05.
Table 6: Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA) Composition
Puntius sophore (Fresh) | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Boiled | Puntius sophore (Fresh)- Fried | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried) | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-boiled | Puntius sophore (Sun-dried)-fried | Puntius sophore (Feremented) | Puntius sophore (Feremented)-Boiled | Puntius sophore (Feremented)-Fried | |
C18:2ɷ-6 | 11.1±1.5 | 10.6±2.5 | 11.3±3.8 | 10.1±4.1 | 9.9±3.7 | 10.2±6.4 | 9.8±4.6 | 9.6±3.2 | 10.7±2.6 |
C18:3ɷ-3 | 1.6±0.0 | 1.5±0.3 | 1.7±0.4 | 1.8±0.7 | 1.6±0.2 | 1.8±0.8 | 1.5±0.4 | 1.2±0.2 | 1.4±0.3 |
C18:3ɷ-6 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.4±0.1 | – | – | 0.2±0.0 | – | – | 0.3±0.0 |
C18:4ɷ-3 | 0.4±0.0 | – | 0.4±0.0 | – | – | 0.2±0.0 | – | – | 0.2±0.0 |
C20:2ɷ-6 | 1.6±0.2 | 1.2±0.0 | 1.8±0.1 | 1.4±0.3 | 1.2±0.8 | 1.7±0.4 | 1.3±0.7 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.4±0.5 |
C20:3ɷ-6 | 1.1±0.1 | 1.0±0.3 | 1.4±0.8 | 1.2±0.4 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.7±0.6 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.0±0.1 | 1.5±0.7 |
C20:3ɷ-3 | – | – | 0.2±0.1 | – | – | 0.4±0.1 | – | – | 0.3±0.0 |
C20:4ɷ-6 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.8±0.5 | 1.1±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.9±0.4 | 0.8±0.6 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.7±0.6 |
C20:5ɷ-3 (EPA) | 1.8±0.1 | 1.3±0.7 | 1.4±0.3 | 0.8±0.0 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.9±0.3 | 1.5±0.2 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.6±0.3 |
C22:5ɷ-3 | – | – | 0.2±0.1 | – | – | 0.2±0.0 | – | – | 0.3±0.1 |
C22:6ɷ-3 (DHA) | 1.1±0.0 | 1.0±0.5 | 0.8±0.3 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.6±0.3 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.4±0.3 |
ΣPUFA | 28.4 | 28.0 | 28.7 | 23.3 | 23.2 | 24.1 | 22.5 | 22.0 | 22.8 |
Σω-3 | 8.6 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 5.9 |
Σω-6 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.9 |
ω-3/ω-6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.0 |
DHA (mg/dl) | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
DHA+EPA (mg/dl) | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
Cholesterol(mg) | 88.4±3.7 | 88.0±9.7 | 88.8±8.3 | 98.8±8.7 | 98.2±7.2 | 98.4±8.8 | 88.5±4.2 | 88.1±8.8 | 88.2±6.3 |
‘-‘ represented not found any significant result
The values are expressed as mg of specific fatty acid is present in 100g of fish sample. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation of individual fish samples analyzed in triplicate. Significance level is p < 0.05.
Conclusion
The increased amount of ash and protein content was observed in processed (sun-dried and fermented) P. sophore. On the other hand, fat content was reduced in fermented fish sample. Processed sample of P. sophore (sun-dried and fermented) contained increased amount of minerals except Ca and Mg. Fish processing techniques such as sun-drying and fermentation has some effects on amino acid and fatty acid composition. Both were reduced after processing. On the other hand, cooking had considerable effects on nutritional value of P.sophore. Fried sample of fresh, sun-dried and fermented P. sophore sample contained more fat, ash, minerals, fatty acids than the boiled fish which play an important role in human health. Based on the results of proximate, minerals, amino acids and fatty acid composition frying process of fresh and processed (sun-dried and fermented) sample of P. sophore was found to be good for health.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India, for providing Startup Grant for newly recruited faculty and as financial support. We are also acknowledging Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India for awarding DST Fast Track Scheme to Dr. Kuntal Manna. The authors are grateful to New Jersey Feed Lab Inc., 1686 Fifth St, Trenton NJ 08638, USA for providing instrument facility. The authors are also grateful for State Biotech Hub, Tripura Central University-799022, for providing working facility. The authors are also grateful for Tripura State Pollution Control Board, Kunjaban, Gorkhabasti, Agartala-799006, providing the instrumental facility for analysis of minerals. The authors are also indebted to Mr. W. Somraj Singh, and Mr. Bikash Debnath, Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacy; Tripura Central University for editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Njoroge S.W., Laposata M., Katrangi W., Seegmiller A.C. DHA and EPA reverse cystic fibrosis-related FA abnormalities by suppressing FA desaturase expression and activity. J Lipid Res. (2012); 53 (2): 257–265. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M018101
CrossRef - Mahanty A., Ganguly S., Verma A., et al. Nutrient profile of small indigenous fish Puntius sophore: Proximate composition, amino acid, fatty acid and micronutrient profiles. Natl Acad Sci Lett (2014); 37 (1): 39–44. DOI: 10.1007/s40009-013-0186-3
CrossRef - Roos N., Islam M., Thilsted S.H. Small fish is an important dietary source of vitamin A and calcium in rural Bangladesh. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2003); 54 (5): 329–339. DOI: 10.1080/09637480120092125
CrossRef - Jadhev M.G., Magar N.G. Preservation of fish freezing and glazing. I- Bacteriology of fresh, frozen and glazed fish. Fish Tech (India) (1970); 7 (1): 86-90.
- Valson A.P. A comparative yield and biochemical evaluation of the existing fish curing methods of India Proc. Sym. Fish Proc. Ind. Mysore, India, (1975); 77-79.
- Cole R., Greenwood-Barton L.H. Problems associated with the development of fisheries in tropical countries: The preservation of catch by simple processes. Trop Sci (1965); 7:165-183.
- Menon A.G.K. Check list- fresh water fishes of India. Records of Zoological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publication, Occasional Paper No.175, (1999); 366.
- Samad M.A., Galib S.M., Flowra F.A. Fish drying in Chalan Beel areas, Bangladesh. J Sci Ind Res (India) (2009) 4(4): 461-466.
CrossRef - Roos N., Wahab M.A., Hossain M.A.R., Thilsted S.H. Linking human nutrition and fisheries: Incorporating micronutrient-dense, small indigenous fish species in carp polyculture production in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull (2007); 28(2): 280-293 (supplement). DOI: 10.1177/15648265070282S207
CrossRef - Rahman A.K.A. Freshwater Fishes of Bangladesh. 2nd ed. Zoological Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (2005); Eriksson C.E. Oxidation of lipids in food systems. In Autoxidation of unsaturated lipids (Ed.Chan, H.W.S.), Academic Press, London. (1987) pp. 207-231.
- Eriksson C.E. Oxidation of lipids in food systems. In Autoxidation of unsaturated lipids (Ed.Chan, H.W.S.), London: Academic Press (1987) pp. 207-231.
- Kimura M., Itokawa Y. Cooking losses of minerals in foods and its nutritional significance. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (1990); 36: S25-S32.
CrossRef - Pearson D. Pearson’s composition and analysis of foods. University of Reading, (1999); 117-123.
- Folch J., Lees M., Sloan-Stanley G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem (1957); 226: 497–509.
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 13th ed. Washington D.C (1980); 376-384.
- Mohanty B.P., Paria P., Das D., Ganguly S. Nutrient profile of giant river catfish Sperata seenghala (Sykes). Natl Acad Sci Lett (2012); 5(3): 155–161. DOI: 10.1007/s40009-012-0014-1
CrossRef - Ishida Y., Fujita T., Arai K. New detection and separation methods for amino acid by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr (1981); 204:143–148.
CrossRef - Sastry C.S.P., Tammuru M.K. Spectrophotometric determination of tryptophan in protein. J Food Sci Technol (1985); 22: 146–147.
- Metcalfe L.D., Schmitz A.A., Petha J.R. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids for gas chromatography analysis. Anal Chem (1966); 38(3): 514.
CrossRef - Chatzimichalakis P.M., Samanidou V.F., Papadoyannis J.N. Development of validated liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous determination of eight fat-soluble vitamins in biological fluids after solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr B (2004); 805: 289–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.03.009
CrossRef - Mustafa M.G., Begum S.R., Abdul Khaleque M.D., Jannat M., Ahsan D.A. Nutritional Qualities of Hilsha And Sarpunti In Different Salt CURING METHODS. Dhaka Univ J Biol Sci (2012); 21(1): 97‐
CrossRef - Unlusayin M., Kaleli S., Gulyavuz H. The determination of flesh productivity and protein components of some fish species after hot smoking. J Sci Food Agric (2001) ; 81: 661–664.
CrossRef - Clucas I.J., Ward A.R. Post-harvest fisheries development. A guide to handling, preservation, processing and quality. Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4TB. United Kingdom. (1996); pp 665.
- Aberoumand A. Preliminary studies on nutritive and organoleptic properties in processed fish fillets obtained from Iran. Food Sci Technol Campinas (2014); 34(2): 287-291.
CrossRef - Ninawe A.S., Rathnakumar K. Fish processing technology and product development, impact of curing. 1st ed. (2008); (5):142.
- Çelik U., Oehlenschläger J. Zinc and copper content in marine fish samples collected from the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Eur Food Res Technol (2005); 220: 37–41.
CrossRef - Bakr A.A., Ragaa A.G. Trials to reduce nitrate and oxalate content in some leafy vegetables; Interactive effect of manipulating of the soil nutrient supply, different blanching media and preservation methods followed by cooking process. J Sci Food Agric (1997); 73: 169-178.
CrossRef - Campo M., Muela E., Olleta J., Moreno L., Santaliestra-PasõÂas A., Mesana R. Influence of cooking method on the nutrient composition of Spanish light lamb. J Food Compos Anal (2013); 31 (2): 185-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.010
CrossRef - Taira H. Heat Destruction of Amino Acids in Soybean Products. Food Analysis and Nutrition Division, National Food Research Institute (1973); 7(4): 267-273.
- Boziaris I.S. Seafood Processing Technology, Quality and Safety. Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom, (2014)
CrossRef - Muller H.G., Tobin G. Nutrition and food processing croom helm. 5th London. https://trove.nla.gov. au/version/210906714. (1980)
- Larsen, D., Quek, S. Y., & Eyres, L. (2010). Effect of cooking method on the fatty acid profile of New Zealand king salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Food Chemistry,119 (2), 785–790. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.037
CrossRef - Saguy, I.S., & Dana, D. (2003). Integrated approach to deep fat frying: Engineering, nutrition, health and consumer aspects. Journal of Food Engineering, 56 (2-3), 143–152. Doi: 10.1016/s0260-8774(02)00243-1
CrossRef - Kalyoncu, L., Kıssal S., & Aktumsek A. (2009). Seasonal changes in the total fatty acid composition of Vimba Vimba Vimba tenella (Nordmann, 1840) in Egirdir Lake, Turkey. Food Chemistry, 116 (3), 728–730. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.016
CrossRef
Abbreviation
Arg: Arginine
His: Histidine
Iso: Isoleucine
Leu: Leucine
Lys: Lysine
Met: Methionine
Phe: Phenylalanine
Thr: Threonine
Tyr: Tyrosine
Val: Valine
Trp: Tryptophan
Cys: Cysteine
Glu: Glutamic acid
Gly: Glycine
Pro: Proline
Ala: Alanine
Asp: Aspartic acid
Ser: Serine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.