PPPIntroduction
Nutraceutical beverages are made primarily from plant components, such as fruit, seeds, rhizomes and vegetables, as well as animal products such as milk and dairy-based and alcoholic drinks. The taste, aroma, and flavour of such beverages should be first accepted, and thereafter other beneficial aspects can be gained for health promotion and disease prevention.1 Currently, nutraceutical potential of plants has been explored for the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus.2
Morindacitrifolia L., commonly known as “mengkudu” or “pace” in Indonesia, is an evergreen shrub of about 3 to 6 m high. It is widely cultivated in many areas, including Asia, Australia, and Pacific islands. The fruit juice has been used to treat a broad range of illnesses such as bowel disorders, skin inflammation, liver diseases, urinary tract infection, cardiac diseases, and many more. The available literature indicates that the fruit juice of M. citrifolia lowers the level of the postprandial blood glucose, thus have antidiabetic activity.3 However, to date, only a few studies have examined antidiabetic activities of the juice from fermented fruit of M. citrifolia. Nayak et al., reported on anti-diabetic effects of the fermented fruit juice (fFJ) using animal (mice).4 It was also reported that fFJ reduces body weights and improves glucose tolerance in mice.5, 6 Thus, it is interesting to study on various aspects of the α-glucosidase inhibitory properties of this fermented fruit.
Acarbose, a complex oligosaccharide, is an effective α-glucosidase inhibitor and has been clinically proven in maintaining glycemic control. Together with other synthetic α-glucosidase inhibitors such as voglibose and miglitol, acarbose has been reported to reduce the progression of diabetes as well as its complications, such as neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy.7 Therefore, it has become one of the first line drugs of choice in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM patients are recommended to take 100 – 200 mg three times daily for a maintenance dose. Nonetheless, long term use of acarbose is known to cause adverse side effects associated with gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse effects.8 In an effort to reduce undesirable side effects caused by large doses of single medication, the combined use of drugs has gained more attention. Herbal extracts from fruit and teas have been reported to possess inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and have few side effects.9 Many studies have reported combined inhibition of herbal extracts or compounds with acarbose.10, 11However, until recently, little information is available on the possible interaction between acarbose and fFJ of M. citrifolia.
Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of fFJ of M. citrifolia, including enzyme inhibition mechanism and its effect on α-glucosidase when combined with acarbose. The chemical and microbial profiles of the fFJ was also evaluated.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4- hydroxytoluene (BHT), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin&Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EC 3.2.1.20), and p-nitrophenyl-α-D glucopyranoside(pNPG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Gallic acid (GA) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, USA). Acarbose was purchased from United States Pharmacopeia. All solvents and other chemicals were of analytical grade
Preparation of fFJ
FFJ was obtained directly from the local producer in Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia (product name: Lentera Morinda). According to the producer, the fermentation process was performed as follows: the fully ripe fruit was washed. The fruit was then kept in airtight plastic bags and left to ferment spontaneously for 100 days at room temperature. The airtight bags were opened to end of the fermentation process and the liquid was filtered to obtain a clear liquid which was ready for consumption. The liquid was stored at -20 oC before used for bioactivity analysis.
Total phenolic content (TPC) assay
TPC was determined by a modified Folin-Ciocalteu method12 and estimated by a gallic acid standard curve. Results were expressed as μggallic acid equivalent (μg GAE)/ml.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometry (LC-MS) analysis
The fFJ was analyzed on a Mariner Biospectrometry system equipped with a Hitachi L 6200binary pump. The column used was a Shimp-pack C8, 150 × 6 mm i.d. The sample was prepared in methanol with 0.3% formic acid, injected at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The HPLC was fitted with a Q-tof mass spectrometer interface, with an ESI (Electrospray Ionisation) source in a positive ion mode. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing gas at a flow rate of 10 (arbitrary units). Voltages were optimized over time and after instrument maintenance for each segment; capillary and tube lens voltages were in the range of 17-46 and 65-115 V, respectively. The spray voltage and capillary temperature for all samples were set at 4 kV and 275 oC. In each segment, three scans were recorded: (1) full scan with ranges, (2) selected ion monitoring (SIM) scan for isolating the precursor ions, and (3) selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode for isolating the fragment ions of samples for quantifications. The sample molecular weights, precursor ions, collision energies and fragment ions used for quantifications were reported.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Pellet of fFJ was obtained by centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 mins at 4 oC. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) twice. The washed pellet was resuspended in glutaraldehyde (3%) in a 1:1 ratio and incubated at room temperature for 12 h. After washing in PBS three times for 15 mins, pellet underwent successive dehydration steps in a graded ethanol solution (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100 %) each for 5 mins. Cells were air dried and coated with gold (Tioe Q150RS) for 15 s (20 nm). They were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi TM3000). The S16 sequencing technique was then carried out to identify the microbiome in fFJ.
α-Glucosidase assay
α-Glucosidase inhibitory activities of fFJ of M.citrofolia was determined based on our reported procedure.13 Different concentrations of fFJ were prepared by serial dilutions. The reaction mixture was prepared to consist of the sample (50 μl), 50 µl of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.8) and 50 µl of α-glucosidase (0.5 U/ml). This mixture was incubated for 5 mins at 37o C, thereafter, 100 µl of substrate p-nitrophenyl- α-D-glucoside (1 mM) was added to start the reaction. The reaction was further incubated for 20 mins at 37 oC and stopped by the addition of 750 µl Na2CO3 (100 mM). The absorbance was recorded at 405 nm in a spectrophotometer. The control solution was prepared by replacing the sample with buffer
The inhibition percentage was calculated using the following equation:
Where A control is the absorbance of control; A sample is the absorbance of the sample. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was expressed as IC50 and determined from the graph plotted against the percentage of inhibition. The value was compared with the positive control acarbose, a standardly prescribed medicine for DM.
Evaluation of combined inhibitory effect against α-glucosidase
The combined effect of fFJ of M.citrofolia and acarbose, a prescribed α-glucosidase medicine, was evaluated using a drug combination method developed by Chou-Talalay.14, 15 Firstly, IC50 of individual inhibitor (fFJ of M.citrofolia or acarbose) were determined using dose-response curves. Then, combined fFJ of M.citrofolia and acarbose at different IC50 combinations were examined for their inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase. Data were calculated using Compusyn software® to obtain combination indexes (CI) for each individual or combined inhibitors.
Based on the CI values, drug combinations were considered of having synergistic effects when CI values < 0.9, additive effects CI = 0.9 – 1.1, or antagonistic effects CI > 1.1.
Determination of enzyme inhibition mechanism
The inhibition type of fFJ of M.citrofolia on α-glucosidase activity was determined using Lineweaver-Burk plot analysis. In this method, a kinetic assay was carried out using p-nitrophenyl-α-D glucopyranoside as a substrate at different concentrations (0.15 – 1 mM).16 The substrate was incubated with α-glucosidase (0.5 U/ml) in the absence and presence of fFJ of M.citrifolia at different concentrations (35.79; 71.59; 89.49 μg GAE/ml). Double reciprocal plots (1/[S] and 1/[V]) were constructed to point out the type of inhibition.
DPPH assay
The free radical scavenging activity of fFJ of M.citrofolia was measured based on DPPH assay according to the previous method17 with minor modification. The assay is based on the ability of a substrate to donate a hydrogen atom in order to scavenge the DPPH radical. DPPH solution (0.6 mM in ethanol) was prepared and 1 ml of this solution was added to 3 ml of sample in various concentration. The mixture was immediately vortexed and incubated for 30 minutes in darkness at room temperature. The decrease in absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer. BHT (1.67 – 53.00 μg/ml) and ascorbic acid (10 – 80 μg/ml) were used as reference solutions and ethanol was used as a blank solution. The percentage of inhibition activity was calculated according to the following equation:
Where A control is the absorbance of control; A sample is the absorbance of the sample. The concentration of the sample and the references required to scavenge 50% of the DPPH radical was defined as IC50 and was determined by the graph plotted against the percentage of inhibition. The value expressed as µg GAE/ml and was compared with the reference solutions.
Statistical Analysis
All assays were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as the mean value and standard deviation (SD). Regression method was used to calculate IC50.
Results and Discussion
Characteristic of fFJ of M. citrofolia
Due to the fermentation process, the juice was dark in colour and had low pH (pH 4).
The main microbe found in fFJ is yeast (Figure 1). The SEM image showed cylindrical yeast cells with budding on the apical site. Based on the 16S sequencing method, the yeast was identified as Candida. Interestingly, the yeast was not able to grow in the normal growth medium for yeast, such as Sabouroud agar.
Figure 1: The SEM image of yeast in fFJ of M. citrifolia Click here to View figure |
The plant phenolics are an important class of secondary metabolites that have been associated with the plants’ biological activities, such as antidiabetic and antioxidant activities.18, 19 Our study found that fFJ was rich in phenolics as shown in its TPC, 1193 ± 4.72 μg GAE/ml. When the juice extract was further evaluated for its chemical compositions, the LC-MS analysis showed two main peaks (Figure 2), with 146 m/z (100%) and 132 m/z (100%). These are designated for two organic compounds, namely α-ketoglutaric and malic acids, which were in agreement with the previous report.20
Figure 2: The LC-MS profile of fFJ of M.citrofolia Click here to View figure |
Inhibitory effect of fFJ on the activity of α-glucosidase
The fruit of M. citrofolia has been widely used in the Asia Pacific region for the remedy of various diseases such as diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, liver and cardiovascular diseases.21In the present study, fermented fruit juice (fFJ) of M.citrifolia was used for the investigation of antidiabetic properties.
Our investigation demonstrated that fFJ of M.citrifolia inhibited α-glucosidase in a concentration-dependent manner giving rise to IC50of 28.99μg GAE/ml (Table 1). The IC50 of acarbose was 823.99 ± 0.06 μg/ml, which is close to the previous report.22 These results indicated fFJ of M.citrifoliais a more effective inhibitor when compared to acarbose under the same assay condition.
Table 1: α-Glucosidase inhibitory activities of fFJ of M.citrofolia and acarbose.
Concentration(ug GAE/ml) | Inhibition(%) | IC50(ug GAE/ml) |
11.93 | 9.69 ± 2.60 | 28.99 ± 4.31 |
17.90 | 24.17 ± 8.03 | |
23.86 | 37.78 ± 5.40 | |
29.83 | 52.57 ± 4.75 | |
35.80 | 65.53 ± 0.75 | |
Acarbose | 823.99 ± 0.06 |
Earlier studies reported a positive relationship between the total phenolic content and the ability to inhibit α-glucosidase.23 Indeed, some plant-derived- phenolics have been reported to exhibit more effective α-glucosidase inhibition activities than acarbose.24, 25In this direction, the observed inhibition activity of fFJ may be related to the action of polyphenol compounds on the enzyme.
Combined inhibitory effect of fFJ of M.citrifolia with acarbose.
The use of the antidiabetic drug acarbose is reported to be related to gastrointestinal adverse effects. Strong inhibition on intestinal α-glucosidase resulted in undigested polysaccharide in the large intestine. This leads to bacterial fermentation which produces gases such as methane and carbon dioxide, causing complications, such as abdominal cramping, flatulence, and diarrhoea. Therefore, reducing the dosage of acarbose may potentially reduce the side effects. Previous studies reported that plant materials have inhibitory activities on α-glucosidase26 indicating that they may be effective therapeutic agents for controlling postprandial hyperglycemia with fewer side effects. Thus, experiments were then performed to evaluate whether fFJ in combination with acarbose has a synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effect.
Combined effects of fFJ of M.citrifolia and acarbose on α-glucosidase activities were analysed by combination index (CI) values. The CI values were in the range of 0.85 – 5.42 (Table 2). Based on the CI values, there were four CI values calculated between 0.85 – 1.11, suggesting an additive effect. These were obtained when acarbose was combined with fFJ at 2.7 folds of its IC50. The additive effect explains the increased inhibitions observed at these combinations. In contrast, an antagonistic effect was observed when acarbose was combined with fFJ at 0.25 – 2 folds of its IC50 values.
Table 2: The CI (combination index) values of the combined inhibitory activities of FJ of M. citrofolia and acarbose on α-glucosidase.
Acarbose IC50 | fFJM. citrifoliavalue ratioIC50 | ||||
0.25 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.70 | |
0.25 | 3.62 | 5.42 | 4.91 | 1.76 | 1.11 |
0.50 | 2.68 | 2.67 | 3.2 | 1.65 | 0.85 |
1.00 | 2.30 | 3.17 | 3.35 | 1.54 | 0.97 |
2.00 | 2.60 | 2.4 | 2.98 | 2.97 | 1.11 |
2.70 | 2.34 | 2.3 | 2.65 | 1.93 | 0.97 |
Our findings revealed that fFJ of M. citrofolia showed an additive effect when fFJ at various concentrations combined with acarbose at high concentration. The additive combination between plant polyphenols and acarbose has been reported previously by other researchers.27 This effect suggests that polyphenols may be used in conjunction with acaborse in maintaining glycemic control, thus may be beneficial in the treatment of T2DM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the combined effect of fFJ of M.citrifolia and acarbose.
Enzyme inhibition mechanism
Kinetic assays were carried out to determine the mode of inhibition of fFJ of M.citrifolia and acarbose on α-glucosidase. The mode of inhibitions was evaluated based on Lineweaver-Burk plots. For fFJ of M.citrifolia, the plots generated straight lines with different intersections on the Y-axis (Figure 3), suggesting a non-competitive inhibition. In contrast, the plots for acarbose gave straight lines with a point of intersection on the Y-axis. This observation indicates that acarbose inhibited α-glucosidase in a competitive mode, as also found by others.10
Figure 3: Lineweaver-Burk plots for the inhibition of α-glucosidase by (a) fFJ M.citrofolia and (b) acarbose with pNPG as a substrate Click here to View figure |
The molecular interactions of the plant polyphenols on the specific binding sites on α-glucosidase are still unclear. Modelling studies proposed that the hydroxyl groups in polyphenolics structure may interact with the polar groups (amide, guanidine, carboxyl groups) in the active sites of the enzyme by the formation of hydrogen bonds. These interactions may change the molecular conformation of the enzyme, resulting in a decrease in enzyme activity.28, 29
Antioxidant activity of fFJ of M. citrofolia
In the DPPH assay, fFJ exhibited scavenging activities in a concentration-dependent manner, in the range of 1.49 to 11.93 μg GAE /mL (Table 3), obtaining IC50 of 14.09 μg GAE/mL. The IC50 values of standard compounds BHT and ascorbic acids were 21.36 and 53.24 μg/ml. These results suggest that fFJ had stronger antioxidant activity than standards.
Table 3: The DPPH inhibitory activity (IC50) of fFJ of M.citrifolia and standards.
Concentration(ug GAE/ml) | Inhibition(%) | IC50 (prediction)(ug GAE/ml) |
1.49 | 10.98 ± 2.45 | 14.09 ± 2.16 |
2.98 | 19.41 ± 2.46 | |
5.97 | 24.4 ± 2.32 | |
8.95 | 36.19 ± 2.01 | |
11.93 | 42.82 ± 1.6 | |
Ascorbic acid | 53.24 ± 0.82 | |
BHT | 21.36 ± 0.80 |
Conclusion
In conclusion, fFJ of M.citrifoliawas demonstrated to inhibit α-glucosidase in vitro more effectively than acarbose. Its combination with acarbose is possible to be used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study can recommend fFJ as a candidate to be developed as a nutraceutical beverage. However, further in vivo studies were necessary to elucidate the combination effect of fFJ and acarbose on α-glucosidase activity.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support from the Faculty of Medicine KridaWacana Christian University and the use of facilities in the institution. We thank Ms. Puspa from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences for the LC-MS sample examination. We also thank Mr. HabelPaidjo for kindly donating the fermented noni juice.
Conflict of interest
We declare we have no conflict of interest.
References
- Sharma M., Dwivedi P., Singh Rawat A. K., Dwivedi A. K. 3 – Nutrition Nutraceuticals: A Proactive Approach for Healthcare. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. Nutraceuticals: Academic Press; 2016. p. 79-116.
- Garg R. C. Chapter 12 – Nutraceuticals in Glucose Balance and Diabetes. In: Gupta RC, editor. Nutraceuticals. Boston: Academic Press; 2016. p. 145-60.
CrossRef - Algenstaedt P., Stumpenhagen A., Westendorf J. The Effect of Morinda citrifolia L. Fruit Juice on the Blood Sugar Level and Other Serum Parameters in Patients with Diabetes Type 2. Evid-based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018.
- Nayak B. S., Marshall J. R., Isitor G., Adogwa A. Hypoglycemic and Hepatoprotective Activity of Fermented Fruit Juice of Morinda citrifolia (Noni) in Diabetic Rats. Evid-Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:1-5.
- Lee S.-Y., Park S.-L., Hwang J.-T., Yi S.-H., Nam Y.-D., Lim S.-I. Antidiabetic Effect of Morinda citrifolia (Noni) Fermented by Cheonggukjang in KK-Ay Diabetic Mice. Evid-Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012.
- Nerurkar P. V., Hwang P. W., Saksa E. Anti-Diabetic Potential of Noni: The Yin and The Yang. Molecules. 2015;20(10):17684-719.
CrossRef - McIver L. A., Whitten R. A. Acarbose. 2018.
- Zhang L., Chen Q., Li L., Kwong J. S., Jia P., Zhao P., et al., α-Glucosidase Inhibitors and Hepatotoxicity in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scie Rep. 2016;6:32649.
CrossRef - Hung H. Y., Qian K., Morris-Natschke S. L., Hsu C. S., Lee K. H. Recent Discovery of Plant-Derived Anti-Diabetic Natural Products. Nat prod rep. 2012;29(5):580-606.
CrossRef - Ajmal Shah M., Khalil R., Ul-Haq Z., Panichayupakaranant P. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Effect of Rhinacanthins-rich Extract from Rhinacanthus nasutus Leaf and Synergistic Effect in Combination with Acarbose. J Funct Foods. 2017;36:325-31.
CrossRef - Sun W., Sun J., Zhang B., Xing Y., Yu X., Li X., et al., Baicalein Improves Insulin Resistance via Regulating SOCS3 and Enhances The Effect of Acarbose on Diabetes Prevention. J Funct Foods. 2017;37:339-53.
CrossRef - Awad M. A., Al-Qurashi A. D., Alrashdi A. M. A., Mohamed S. A., Faidi F. Developmental Changes in Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Capacity and Enzymes Activity in Skin of ‘El-Bayadi’ Table Grapes. Sci Hortic. 2017;224:219-25.
CrossRef - Timotius K. H., Simamora A., Santoso A. W. Chemical Characteristics and In Vitro Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Activities of Premna serratifolia L. Leaf Infusion and Decoction. Pharmacog J. 2018;10(6):1114-8.
CrossRef - Chou T.-C. Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies. PharmacolRev. 2006;58(3):621-81.
CrossRef - Zhang B.-w., Sang Y.-b., Sun W.-l., Yu H.-s., Ma B.-p., Xiu Z.-l., et al., Combination of Flavonoids from Oroxylum indicum Seed Extracts and Acarbose Improves The Inhibition of Postprandial Blood Glucose: In Vivo and In vitro Study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:890-8.
CrossRef - Simamora A., Paramita L., Mohamad Hamid N. A. B., Santoso A. W., Timotius K. H. In Vitro Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Activities of Aqueous Extract from The Leaves and Fruit of Psidium guajava L. Indones Biomed J 2018;10(2):156-64.
CrossRef - Atere T. G., Akinloye O. A., Ugbaja R. N., Ojo D. A., Dealtry G. In Vitro Antioxidant Capacity and Free Radical Scavenging Evaluation of Standardized Extract of Costus afer Leaf. FSHW. 2018;7(4):266-72.
CrossRef - Xiao J., Kai G., Yamamoto K., Chen X. Advance in Dietary Polyphenols as α-Glucosidases Inhibitors: A Review on Structure-Activity Relationship Aspect. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(8):818-36.
CrossRef - Shahidi F., Ambigaipalan P. Phenolics and Polyphenolics in Foods, Beverages and Spices: Antioxidant Activity and Health Effects – A Review. J Funct Foods. 2015;18:820-97.
CrossRef - Pino J. A. Advances in Research on Noni Volatile Compounds. Intl J Noni Res. 2009;4(1-2):1-17.
- Ali M., Kenganora M., Manjula S. N. Health Benefits of Morinda citrifolia (Noni): A Review. Pharmacog J. 2016;8(4):321-34.
CrossRef - Gao J., Xu P., Wang Y., Wang Y., Hochstetter D. Combined Effects of Green Tea Extracts, Green Tea Polyphenols or Epigallocatechin Gallate with Acarbose on Inhibition against α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase in vitro. Molecules. 2013;18(9):11614-23.
CrossRef - Wongsa P., Chaiwarit J., Zamaludien A. In Vitro Screening of Phenolic Compounds, Potential Inhibition against α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase of Culinary Herbs in Thailand. Food Chem. 2012;131(3):964-71.
CrossRef - Yang D., Xie H., Jiang Y., Wei X. Phenolics from Strawberry cv. Falandi and Their Antioxidant and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities. Food Chem. 2016;194:857-63.
CrossRef - Ha T. J., Bo Song S., Ko J., Park C.-H., Ko J.-M., Choe M.-E., et al., Isolation and Identification of α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Constituents from The Seeds of Vigna nakashimae: Enzyme Kinetic Study with Active Phytochemical. Food Chem. 2018;266:483-9.
CrossRef - Seetaloo A. D., Aumeeruddy M. Z., Rengasamy Kannan R. R., Mahomoodally M. F. Potential of Traditionally Consumed Medicinal Herbs, Spices, and Food Plants to Inhibit Key Digestive Enzymes Geared towards Diabetes Mellitus Management — A Systematic Review. S Afr J Bot. 2019;120:3-24.
CrossRef - Adisakwattana S., Lerdsuwankij O., Poputtachai U., Minipun A., Suparpprom C. Inhibitory Activity of Cinnamon Bark Species and Their Combination Effect with Acarbose against Intestinal α-Glucosidase and Pancreatic α-Amylase. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011;66(2):143-8.
CrossRef - Villa-Rodriguez J. A., Kerimi A., Abranko L., Tumova S., Ford L., Blackburn R. S., et al., Acute Metabolic Actions of The Major Polyphenols in Chamomile: An In Vitro Mechanistic Study on Their Potential to Attenuate Postprandial Hyperglycaemia. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5471.
CrossRef - Proença C., Freitas M., Ribeiro D., Oliveira E. F., Sousa J. L., Tomé S. M., et al., α-Glucosidase Inhibition by Flavonoids: An In Vitro and In Silico Structure–Activity Relationship Study. J enzyme inhibit med chem. 2017;32(1):1216-28.
CrossRef
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.