Introduction
Legumes play a major role in the diet of humans and provide well balanced diet along with cereals.1 They are good source of vitamins, minerals and polyunsaturated fatty acids also rich in trace elements such as iron and iodine.2 Pigeon pea also contains essential amino acids such as cystine, lycine, tyrosine, and arginine.
In India, after chick pea red gram is the most widely grown pulse crop, cultivating in an area of 4.42 mha and production of 2.86 MT and productivity of about 707 kg/ha.3 Pigeon pea is an important crop in India and contributing around 18 percent and 12 percent to total area and production respectively. In India pigeon pea is used in many food preparations like dal, sambar and green immature seeds are used in vegetable preparation.4
Non digestible carbohydrates such as raffinose family sugars of legumes are responsible for the production of flatus, due to lack of α-galactosidase enzyme that catalyzes α- (1, 6) glycosidic bonds in human and animals.5 The consumption of red gram seeds is restricted in human nutrition due to the presence of anti-nutritional components including oligosaccharides. The undigested, raffinose family oligosaccharides are fermented with the microflora of the intestine.6 As a result of this the byproducts such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane are produced causing flatus and abdominal discomfort.7
Therefore, to make pigeon pea more acceptable by several methods of processing is to reduce the flatulence inducing factors. The use of enzymes and soaking or germinating the seeds before cooking can reduce the oligosaccharide content.8 Traditional processing practices have been followed for many years to convert legumes in to the more acceptable forms. Such processes not only improve the digestibility and palatability of legumes but also help to remove some anti-nutritional factors. Household processing of pulses has been known to improve nutritional quality by increasing protein digestibility and also by reducing anti-nutrients.9 Ramadoss et al., have reported the oligosaccharides and sucrose content in 32 pigeon pea cultivars.10 Soaking of pulses in sodium bicarbonate results in significant reduction in raffinose family of oligosaccharides and enhances the protein digestibility and absorption.11
Oligosaccharides are known to be low calorie substances and last decade have gained interest in food and pharma industries as functional foods.12 Oligosaccharides can be found naturally or synthesized from disaccharides or by the hydrolysis of polysaccharides.13 Oligosaccharide content in soybean of Thailand was proven to be a potential source of prebiotics.14
Data regarding the oligosaccharide content in new cultivars of red gram and the effect of different domestic processing methods is not available. Aim of the present study is to screen oligosaccharides and to demonstrate the effect of soaking in a mixture of 1% salt solution, cooking, pressure cooking in 1% mango powder (Vasant Dry Mango Powder) and crudeenzymatic hydrolysis for the reduction of oligosaccharide content of red gram seeds.The crude α-galactosidase is a glycoside hydrolase enzyme that removes the terminal α -galactosyl moieties from glycoproteins and glycolipids.15
Table 1: Effect of Cooking in 1% Mango Powder on Raffinose Family Sugars, Reducing, Non-Reducingand Total Soluble Sugars in Red Gram (g Kg-1 dry basis)a
Cooking in 1% mango powder solution (min) | ||||||
Variety | Raw | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
Raffinose | ||||||
Local – Red | 12.6a±0.3 | 5.33b±0.21 | 5.40b±0.4 | 4.00c±0.60 | 4.30c±0.30 | 4.90c±0.60 |
Local-White | 15.8a ±0.6 | 5.30b±0.30 | 4.90b±0 | 4.90b±0.30 | 4.40b±0.40 | 4.13b±0.70 |
Mean±SD | 14.2a±0.5 | 5.31b±0.25 | 5.15b±0.5 | 4.45b±0.45 | 4.35b ±0.35 | 4.51b±0.65 |
Stachyose | ||||||
Local – Red | 17.2a±0.4 | 8.7b±0.5 | 8.4b±0.4 | 7.4c±0.3 | 6.00d±0.40 | 5.90d±0.70 |
Local-White | 17.8a±0.8 | 7.3b±0.3 | 7.0b±0.2 | 7.0b±0.5 | 7.10b±0.50 | 6.80b±0.40 |
Mean±SD | 17.5a±0.6 | 8.0b ±0.4 | 7.7b±0.3 | 7.2b±0.4 | 6.55c±0.45 | 6.35c±0.55 |
Verbascose | ||||||
Local -Red | 48.0a±4 | 36b±3 | 35b±3.0 | 34b±2 | 30b±3 | 23c±3 |
Local-White | 51.0a ±2 | 48b±3 | 45b±2.0 | 30c±2 | 28d±3 | 25d±1 |
Mean±SD | 49.5a ±3 | 42b±3 | 40b±2.5 | 32c±2 | 29c±3 | 24d±2 |
Reducing sugar | ||||||
Local -Red | 8.6a±0.40 | 8.0a±0.40 | 7.2b±0.20 | 6.6b±0.40 | 3.53c±0.31 | 2.50d±0.10 |
Local-White | 9.6a±0.30 | 8.6b±0.30 | 7.4c±0.30 | 6.5d±0.40 | 3.50e±0.20 | 2.80f±0.20 |
Mean±SD | 9.1a ±0.35 | 8.3b±0.35 | 7.3c±0.25 | 6.5d±0.40 | 3.51e±0.25 | 2.65f±0.15 |
Sucrose | ||||||
Local -Red | 24.4a±0.4 | 8.20b±0.20 | 7.53c±0.31 | 7.2c±0.2 | 6.20d±0.20 | 6.0d±0.2 |
Local-White | 29.2a±0.2 | 10.07b±0.45 | 8.50c±0.30 | 8.0c±0.4 | 7.47c±0.32 | 7.2d±0.2 |
Mean±SD | 26.8a±0.3 | 9.13b±0.32 | 8.00c±0.30 | 7.6c±0.3 | 6.83d±0.26 | 6.6d±0.2 |
Total soluble sugars | ||||||
Local – Red | 67.2a±0.4 | 40.8b±0.8 | 49.6c±0.2 | 49.2c±0.2 | 40.0d±1.4 | 30.0e±1.00 |
Local-White | 56.4a±0.3 | 50.8b±0.6 | 50.0b±0.8 | 49.2b±0.4 | 42.2c±0.4 | 23.2d±0.30 |
Mean±SD | 61.8a±0.35 | 45.8b±0.7 | 49.8c±0.5 | 49.2c±0.3 | 41.1d±0.9 | 26.6e±0.65 |
Materials and Methods
Materials
The red gram varieties used in the present study local red and local white were procured from local markets of Hyderabad and Secunderabad, Telangana State. The seeds were cleaned to remove dust and foreign particles and the seeds were stored at 40 C for further study.
Cooking in 1% Mango Powder
Mango powder used in the present study was commercially available in the local market (Vasant Dry Mango Powder). 100gm of red grams seeds were cooked on a hot plate in 1% (w/v) mango powder solution for 60 min at different time intervals. The cooked seeds were rinsed with 500 ml of distilled water and mashed and dried in hot air oven at 50 0C for 40 h and then milled to flour. The oligosaccharide content was estimated immediately by following the method of Tanaka et al.,16
Table 2: Effect of Pressure Cooking in 1% Mango Powder Solution on the Raffinose Family Sugars, Reducing, Non-reducing and Total Soluble Sugars in Red Gram (gKg-1 dry basis)a
Pressure cooking in 1% mango powder solution (min) | ||||
Variety | Raw | 5 | 10 | 15 |
Raffinose | ||||
Local -Red | 12.6a±0.30 | 4.80b±0.6 | 4.60b±0.60 | 4.13b±0.64 |
Local – White | 15.8a±0.60 | 4.87b±0.6 | 4.50b±0.35 | 4.20b±0.20 |
Mean±SD | 14.2a±0.45 | 4.83b±0.6 | 4.55b±0.45 | 4.17b±0.42 |
Stachyose | ||||
Local – Red | 17.2a±0.4 | 6.90b±0.40 | 6.2c±0.17 | 6.10c±0.10 |
Local -White | 17.8a±0.8 | 7.06b±0.30 | 6.8b±0.20 | 6.10c±0.10 |
Mean±SD | 17.5a±0.6 | 7.25b±0.35 | 6.5c±0.18 | 6.10c±0.10 |
Verbascose | ||||
Local- Red | 48.0a±40 | 40.0b±1.0 | 36b±4 | 26c±2.0 |
Local -White | 51.0a±20 | 37.0b±2.0 | 36b±2 | 26c±1.0 |
Mean±SD | 49.5a±2.5 | 38.5b±1.5 | 36b±3 | 26c±1.5 |
Reducing sugar | ||||
Local – Red | 8.6a±0.40 | 4.70b±0.2 | 3.50c±0.3 | 2.80d±0.20 |
Local – White | 9.6a±0.30 | 6.40b±0.4 | 5.40c±0.3 | 3.50d±0.30 |
Mean±SD | 9.1a±0.35 | 5.55b±0.3 | 4.45c±0.3 | 3.15d±0.25 |
Sucrose | ||||
Local -Red | 24.4a±0.4 | 8.9b±0.20 | 8.3c±0.30 | 7.9d±0.3 |
Local – White | 29.2a±0.2 | 16.9b±0.90 | 10.1c±0.20 | 8.1d±0.1 |
Mean±SD | 26.8a±0.3 | 12.9b±0.55 | 9.2c±0.25 | 8.0d±0.2 |
Total soluble sugars | ||||
Local -Red | 67.2a±0.4 | 50.8b±0.6 | 40.0c±0.5 | 28.4d±0.2 |
Local -White | 56.4a±0.3 | 49.6b±0.4 | 41.6c±0.3 | 20.4d±0.4 |
Mean±SD | 61.8a±0.35 | 50.2b±0.5 | 40.8c±0.4 | 24.4d±0.3 |
Pressure- Cooking in 1% Mango Powder
Hundred grams of red gram seeds were pressure cooked in 1% (w/v) mango powder solution at 15 lbs for 15 min with different time intervals and the seeds were washed with distilled water 1:5 (bean : water ratio). These seeds were mashed and dried in hot air oven for 40 h at 500C. The dried seeds were milled to flour and the oligosaccharide content was analyzed as described in above method.
Figure 1: Effect of soaking inmixture of 1%(NaCO3& NaHCO3 &NaCl) on Raffinose family oligosaccharide content Click here to View figure |
Soaking in Mixture of 1% Sodium Carbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Chloride (NaCO3& NaHCO3 &NaCl) Solution
The red gram seeds (100 g) were soaked in a mixture of 1% salt solution of sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and sodium chloride (NaCO3 & NaHCO3 & NaCl) (w/v) (1 liter), for 16 hrs with 4 hrs of time intervals at room temperature (35±2 0C). The soaked solution was decanted after every 4 h time interval. The soaked seeds were rinsed twice with 500 ml and 1 liter of distilled water and seeds were mashed and dried in hot air oven for 40 h at 50 0C. The dried seeds were milled to flour and flour was subjected to oligosaccharide analysis.
Crude α-galactosidase Extraction from Guar Seeds
Theguar seeds (Cyamopsis tetragonolobous) were surface sterilized with 1% mercuric chloride solution for 15 minutes. The seeds were thoroughly washed with distilled water for 4 times and then soaked for 4 hours. The soaked seeds were germinated in a perforated tray on the moist filter paper slightly wetted with distilled water at room temperature for 1-7 days. The de-husked germinated seeds were chilled. The enzyme was extracted from the chilled seedlings by homogenizing with 5 volumes of 50mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.5 containing 2mM EDTA, 2 mM – mercaptoethanol, 1mM phenyl methane sulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), 200mM sodium chloride and 1% insoluble polyvinyl pyroli done (PVP). Slurry was drained through a muslin cloth and the filtrate was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for a period of 20 min. The supernatant were precipitated with 40% ammonium sulphate saturation with agitating at 40 C. The solution was set for sedimentation at 40C for 12 h and then centrifuged at 12000 xg for 20 min. The pooled supernatant was then saturated to 70% ammonium sulphate, and stored for 4 h at 4 0C and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm and kept at 40 C for 20 min. The precipitate was dissolved in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) and dialyzed against 2 liters of 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) for 12 h with two changes.
α- Galactosidase Treatment of Red Gram Flour
Five grams of red gram flour was treated with 50 ml of crude α- galactosidase (containing 0.45 Units ml-1). In the control experiments 5 grams of red gram flour was treated with 50ml of buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.8) in place of enzyme extract. The reaction was incubated at 37 0C for 3 h on an orbital rotary shaker (125 rpm). Succeeding treatment red gram samples were filtered through filter paper (Whatman No.1) and the residue was dried in a hot- air oven at 500C for 40 h and oligosaccharide content was analyzed.
Estimation of Total Carbohydrate
The total carbohydrate content of red gram flour was estimated by using following the method of Dubois et al.,17
Figure 2: Effect of crude α-galactosidase treatment on oligosaccharide content of red gram flourfor 3 hrs. Click here to View figure |
Estimation of Reducing Sugars
The estimation of reducing sugars of red gram flour was followed by the method of Nelson.18
Statistical Analysis
Results were reported as mean standard deviation of triplicate determinations and the significance of difference of means at 5% was analyzed by repeated measure of analysis. The variance was denoted with different letters. The analysis of data was performed by using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 19.0.
Results and Discussion
Effect of Cooking in 1% Mango Powder on Oligosaccharide Content
The commercially available mango powder was used for the preparation of legume recipes.Cooking of red gram seeds in 1% mango powder solution resulted in falling off in the raffinose oligosaccharide content. When seeds were cooked in 1% mango powder for 60 min resulted in reduction of raffinose by 67.26%, stachyose 63.74%, verbascose 51.53% respectively (Table 1). From the table it is evident that the mean reduction of raffinose family sugars was correlated with the cooking time. The domestic processing method also resulted in mean decrease of reducing sugars by 70.88%, total soluble sugars 54.44% and sucrose 58.63% respectively.
The α-galactosidase enzyme hydrolyses the galactose from raffinose family oligosaccharides. Several studies reported the effect of domestic processing on oligosaccharide content of pulses and beans. Cooking of mucuna pruriens and soaking in tamarind pulp extract followed by cooking caused a reduction in the raffinose family sugar content.19 The quality of pulse flours from Algeria has been evaluated and found that inhibition of α-amylase was improved during processing.20 In a study tender seeds of five been cultivars were assessed for changes in raffinose family oligosaccharides content due to boiling, and sterilization. Boiling immature seeds reduced raffinose family oligosaccharides s by 55%. Sterilization resulted in 65% reduction of both total soluble sugars and raffinose family oligosaccharides.21 In a similar study raw chick pea was evaluated for changes in functional carbohydrates under cooking, soaking, and dehydration processes. Among these methods dehydration significantly increased raffinose family oligosaccharides by 43%.22
Effect of Pressure Cooking in 1% Mango Powder on Oligosaccharide Content
Pressure cooking of red gram seeds in 1% mango powder solution for 15 min resulted in mean reduction of oligosaccharide content. The mean reduction was 69.24%, 65.13% and 47.42% for raffinose, stachyose and Verbascose respectively (Table 2). From the table it is also evident that there was a positive correlation between the pressure-cooking time and percent removal of the raffinose family of sugars. Pressure cooking of red gram seeds in 1% mango powder solution also showed a mean decrease of 65.49%, 60.77% and 69.94% for reducing sugars, total soluble sugars and sucrose respectively. All the commonly consumed cereals and pulses as influenced by domestic food processing23 and household processing methods like soaking, sprouting, and dehulling in combination with heating cause an increase nutrient digestibility and bio availability.24
Table 3: Effect of Soaking in Mixture of 1% Sodium Salt (NaCO3 + NaHCO3 + NaCl) Solution on the Raffinose Family Sugars, Reducing, Non-reducing and Total Soluble Sugars in Red gram (gKg-1dry basis)a
Soaking in Mixture of 1%(NaHCO3+NaC1) Solution | |||||
Variety | Raw | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 |
Raffinose | |||||
Local- Red | 12.6a±0.3 | 7.6b±0.5 | 6.8b±0.2 | 4.40c±0.3 | 4.0c±0.4 |
Local – White | 15.8a±0.6 | 7.6b±0.1 | 6.2c±0.3 | 4.83d±0.31 | 4.4c±0.3 |
Mean±SD | 14.2a±0.45 | 7.6b±0.3 | 6.5c±0.25 | 4.62d±0.3 | 4.2d±0.35 |
Stachyose | |||||
Local- Red | 17.2a±0.4 | 10.4b±0.4 | 10.6b±0.3 | 9.0b±0.3 | 3.2c±0.4 |
Local – White | 17.8a±0.8 | 13.4b±0.2 | 11.2c±0.2 | 7.4d±0.5 | 8.4d±0.4 |
Mean±SD | 17.5a±0.6 | 10.4b±0.4 | 10.6b±0.3 | 9.0c±0.3 | 3.2d±0.4 |
Verbascose | |||||
Local – Red | 48.0a±4 | 30b±2.0 | 28b±3.0 | 26b±3.0 | 24b±1.0 |
Local -White | 51.0a±2 | 36b±3.0 | 34b±2.0 | 30c±2.0 | 22d±2.0 |
Mean±SD | 49.5a±3 | 33b±2.5 | 31b±2.5 | 28b±2.5 | 23c±1.5 |
Reducing sugar | |||||
Local – Red | 8.6a±0.40 | 0.4b±0.10 | 0.4b ±0.10 | 0.2c±0.0 | 0.2c±0.0 |
Local – white | 9.6a±0.30 | 1.0b±0.20 | 0.8b±0.20 | 0.2c±0.0 | 0.2c±0.0 |
Mean±SD | 9.1a±0.35 | 0.7b±0.15 | 0.6b±0.15 | 0.2c±0.0 | 0.2c±0.0 |
Sucrose | |||||
Local – Red | 24.4a±0.4 | 10.0b±1.0 | 8c±0.20 | 8.8d±0.4 | 5.2e±0.2 |
Local -White | 29.2a±0.2 | 11.2b±0.4 | 8.4c±0.4 | 10.0d±0.1 | 7.0e±0.4 |
Mean±SD | 26.8a±0.3 | 10.6b±0.7 | 8.2c±0.30 | 9.4d±0.7 | 6.1e±0.3 |
Total soluble sugars | |||||
Local – Red | 67.2a±0.40 | 18.8b±0.4 | 20.0b±2.0 | 14.0c±1.0 | 12.8c±0.4 |
Local – White | 56.4a±0.30 | 21.6b±0.6 | 22.4b±0.4 | 21.6b±0.2 | 16.4c±0.4 |
Mean±SD | 61.8a±0.35 | 20.2b±0.5 | 21.2b±1.2 | 17.8c±0.6 | 14.6d±0.4 |
Effect of Soaking in A Mixture of 1% Salt Solution on Oligosaccharide Content
Results of soaking red gram seeds in a mixture of 1% salt solution (NaCO3 + NaHCO3 + NaCl) are summarized in Table 3. The mean decrease in raffinose family sugars was 70.20%, 67.08% and 53.43% for raffinose,stachyose andverbascose respectively. Soaking of red gram seeds also resulted in the loss of reducing sugars by 97.79%, 77.35% for sucrose and 75.93% for total soluble sugars respectively (Fig.1). The effect of soaking on the level of oligosaccharide content in soybean was investigated and upon soaking, the oligosaccharide losses were 0.68% when compared to initial oligosaccharide content of raw soybean.25 In another study effect of cooking, soaking, on raffinose family oligosaccharide content was studied in lentil and chick pea. The processing resulted in a reduction of soluble carbohydrates of lentil and chick pea by 85% and 57% respectively. Processing of legume flours also exhibited low levels of α-Galactosides.26 Hithamani and Srinivasan,27 have studied the effect of soaking on the polyphenol content and bio-accessibility in finger millet and pearl millet. Soaking of mucuna monosperma seed resulted in the low content of oligosaccgarides. Soaking followed by autoclaving of the mucuna pruriens var. utilis in sodium bicarbonate solution was shown to have maximal reduction of oligo saccharides.28
Table 4: Effect of e α-galactosidase Enzyme Treatment on Raffinose Family Sugars, Reducing, Non Reducing and Total Soluble Sugars in Red Gram (gKg-1 dry basis)a
Variety | Raw | Enzyme treatment |
Local -Red | 12.6±0.30 | 4.80*±0.25 |
Local – white | 15.8±0.60 | 4.90*±0.30 |
Mean±SD | 14.2±0.45 | 4.85*±0.27 |
Local – Red | 17.2±0.4 | 6.2*±0.20 |
Local -White | 17.8±0.80 | 5.8*±0.50 |
Mean±SD | 17.5±0.60 | 6.0*±0.35 |
Local – Red | 48.0±4 | 21.0*±2 |
Local -White | 51.0±2 | 22.0*±2 |
Mean±SD | 49.5±3 | 21.5*±2 |
Local -Red | 8.6±0.40 | 2.8*±0.10 |
Local -White | 9.6±0.30 | 2.8*±0.20 |
Mean±SD | 9.1±0.35 | 2.8*±0.15 |
Local – Red | 24.4±0.4 | 5.2*±0.20 |
Local – White | 29.2±0.2 | 5.4*±0.30 |
Mean±SD | 26.8±0.3 | 5.3*±0.25 |
Local 1 | 67.2±0.40 | 16.0*±0.6 |
Local -White | 56.4±0.30 | 14.6*±0.4 |
Mean±SD | 61.8±0.35 | 15.3*±0.5 |
Effect of Treatment with α- galactosidase on Red Gram (Cajanus cajan, L) Flour
When red gram flour is treated with crude α- galactosidase enzyme from guar seeds reduced raffinose family oligosaccharides content (Table 4). The enzyme treatment resulted in a reduction of raffinose, stachyose and verbascose by 67.18%, 65.68% and 56.55% respectively. Treatment of red gram flour also demonstrated incomplete hydrolysis of raffinose family oligosaccharides as shown in Fig. 2. Crude α- galactosidase treatment have also resulted in the loss of sucrose by 80.09%, reducing sugars by 69.13%, and total soluble sugars by 75.15% .
In a study oligosaccharides were quantified in eight legume species using mass spectrometry. Among the legumes tested cow pea was observed to be a potent source of oligosaccharides.29 Effect of soaking followed by cooking and partly purified α-galactosidase from guar seeds on the oligosaccharide contentofJack bean, Sword beans was investigated and proved that such enzymatic treatment will complement the usage of these beans in human nutrition.30 Zhang W et al.,31 have reported the complete hydrolysis of raffinose and stachyose to galactose within 6 hours time period at 500C by α-Galactosidase enzyme from Termitomyces eurrhizus. Zhang B et al.,32 have reported the effect of α-Galactosidase treatment on energy metabolism for broilers fed on corn- soybean meal diet.
Conclusion
The present study determined that the processing methods substantially reduce raffinose family oligosaccharides content of pulses. Soaking in 1% salt mixture reduced the flatus inducing oligosaccharides of red gram seeds. Crude enzymes preparation from germinating guar seed treatment would seem to be a considerable potential approach to curb the flatus inducing oligosaccharides of red gram and other legume also. Use of all the domestic processing methods which are simple may further complement the usage of red gram as an economical source of micro and macro nutrients for meeting nutritional needs of developing countries.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Director, National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR) for her continuous support.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
- Reyes-Moreno C., Paredes-Lopez O. Hard-to cook phenomenon in common beans –a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutri. 1993;33:227–286.
CrossRef - Augustin J., Klein B. Nutritional composition of raw, cooked, canned and legumes. In: Mathews RH (Ed) Legumes: Chemistry, Technology and Human Nutrition, 2nd Rome: 1989; FAO.
- Sameer kumar C. V., Mula M. G., Singh I. P., Mula R. P., Saxena R. K., Ganga Rao NVPR, Varshney R. K. Pigeon pea Perspective in India. Mariano Marcos State University, Batac, Ilocos Norte, Philippines. 2014;16-18.
- Nene Y. L., Sheila V. K. Pigeon pea: Geography and Importance. In The Pigeonpea Y.L. Nene et al., (Eds.), Cambridge, UK: C_A_B International, Univ. Press. 1990;1-4.
- Liener I. E. Flatus-producing factors. In Toxic Constituents of Plant Foodstuffs I. E. Liener (Eds.), London: Academic Press. 1980;455-457.
- Southgate D. A. Digestion and metabolism of sugars. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:203S–210S.
CrossRef - Suarez F. L., Springfield J., Furne J. K., Lohrmann T. T., Kerr P. S., Levitt M. D. Gas production in human ingesting a soybean flour derived from beans naturally low in oligosaccharides. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(1):135–139.
CrossRef - Reynolds J. H. Immobilized ct-galactosidase continuous flow reactor. Biotech and Bio eng. 1974;16: 135-47.
CrossRef - Reddy N. R., Sathe S. K., Salunkhe D. K. Phytate in legumes and cereals. Adv Food Res. 1982;28:1-9.
CrossRef - Ramadoss B. R., Somanath A., Anusheela V., Sundaram G. R. Natural variability and effect of processing techniques on raffinose family oligosaccharides in pigeon pea cultivars. Legume Res. 2016;39: 528–532.
- Toledo T. C. F., Canniatti-Brazaca S. G. Chemical and nutritional evaluation of carioca beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cooked by different methods. Ciencia Tecnol Alime. 2008;28:355–360.
CrossRef - Flores., Adriana C., Morlett., Jesus A., Rodríguez., Raúl. Inulin Potential for Enzymatic Obtaining of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides.Critical rev food sci nutria. 2016;56:1893-1902.
CrossRef - De Moura F. A., Macagnan F.T. Da Silva., L. P. Oligosaccharide production by hydrolysis of polysaccharides: a review. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015;50:275–281.
CrossRef - Wongputtisin P., Ramaraj R., Unpaprom Y., Kawaree R., Pongtrakul N. Raffinose family oligosaccharides in seed of Glycine max cv. Chiang Mai60 and potential source of prebiotic substances. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015;50:1750–1756.
CrossRef - Calhoun D. H., Bishop D. F., Bernstein H. S., Quinn M., Hantzopoulos P., Desnick R. J. “Fabry disease: isolation of a cDNA clone encoding human alpha-galactosidase A”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1985;82(21):7364–8.
CrossRef - Tanaka M., Thananunkul D., Lee T. C., Chichester C. O. A simplified method for the quantitative determination of sucrose, raffinose in legumes. J Food Sci. 1975;40:1087–1088.
CrossRef - Dubois M., Giller K. A., Rebers P. A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem.1956;28:350–356
CrossRef - Nelson N. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem. 1944;153:75–380.
- Siddhuraju P., Becker K. Effect of Various Domestic Processing Methods on Antinutrients and in Vitro Protein and Starch Digestibility of Two Indigenous Varieties of Indian Tribal Pulse, Mucuna pruriensVar. utilis. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(6):3058–3067.
CrossRef - Moussou N., Corzo-martinez M., Sanz M. L., Zaidi F., Montilla A., Villamiel M. Assessment of Maillard reaction evolution, Prebiotic carbohydrates, antioxidant activity and α-amylase inhibition in pulse flours. J Food Sci Technol. 2017;54:890-900.
CrossRef - Stupski J., Gebczynski P. Changes due to cooking and sterilization in low molecular weight carbohydrates in immature seeds of five cultivars of common bean. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65: 419-25.
CrossRef - Aguilera Y., Benitez V., Molla E., Esteban R. M., Martin-Cabrejas M. A. Influence of dehydration process in Castellano chickpea: changes in bioactive carbohydrates and functional properties. Plant Foods Hum Nutri. 2011;66:391-400.
CrossRef - Hithamani G. Srinivasan Effect of domestic processing on the polyphenol content and bioaccessibility in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Food Chem. 2014;164:55-62
CrossRef - Nakitto A. M., Muyonga J. H., Nakimbugwe D. Effects of combined traditional processing methods on the nutritional quality of beans. Food Sci Nutr. 2015;3:233–241.
CrossRef - Wang Q., Ke L., Yang D., Bao B., Jiang J., Ying T. Change in oligosaccharides during processing of soybean sheet. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007;16:89-94.
- Martin-Cabrejas A., Aguilera Y., Benitez V., Molla E., Lopez-Andreu F.J., Estebanr M. Effect of industrial dehydration on the soluble carbohydrates and dietary fiber fractions in legumes. J Agri food chem. 2006;54:7652-7.
CrossRef - Vijaya kumari K., Siddhuraju P., Janardhanan K. Effect of different post-harvest treatments on antinutritional factors in seeds of the tribal pulse, Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1996;47:263–72
CrossRef - Siddhuraju P., Becker K. Nutritional and antinutritional composition, in vitro amino acid availability, starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index of differentially processed mucuna beans (Mucuna pruriens utilis): an under-utilised legume. Food Chem Barking. 2005;91(2):275-286.
CrossRef - Fan P. H., Zang M. T., Xing J. Oligosaccharides composition in eight food legumes species as detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry.J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(11):2228-36.
CrossRef - Pugalenthi M., Siddhuraju P., Vadivel V. Effect of soaking followed by cooking and the addition of α-galactosidase on oligosaccharides levels in different Canavalia J Food Compost Anal.2006;19:512-517.
- Zhang W., Du F., Wang ., Zhao L., Wang H., Bun N.T. Hydrolysis of Oligosaccharides by a Thermostable α-Galactosidase from Termitomyces eurrhizus. Int Journal of mol Sci. 2015;16: 29226–29235.
CrossRef - Zhang B., Cao Y., Chen Li Y., Qiao., S Ma Y. Effects of α-Galactosidase Supplementation on Performance and Energy Metabolism for Broilers Fed Corn-non-dehulled Soybean Meal Diets. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2010;23(10):1340–1347.
CrossRef
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.