PDF Downloads:
1551
Introduction
The importance of proper nutrition and diet to the overall fitness and health of the individual throughout the life span is well recognized. Health and sports are closely related. Any dietary deficiency that adversely affects the health of the individual is likely to impair his or her physical performance capacity. Thus, nutrition and well being plays a vital role in the field of sports and overall performance of an athlete. Different sports involve different levels of exercise sessions and a balanced diet to have an overall good fitness status. It has been supported by various researches that good nutrition has a very important role in maintaining good health and fitness of the sportsperson so that they can train and compete well. Dietary habits of Indian population have a large variation due to various social, economic and religious beliefs. An optimal eating methodology may be described as one in which the supply of needed supplements is satisfactory to blanket vigor use, and for tissue support, repair and development. The wholesome needs vary from individual to individual depending upon age, sex, form measure and arrangement, occupation, physiological condition and so forth. A typical vegetarian diet tends to contains fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains and legumes excluding all types of meat and fish.1 Non-vegetarian athletes tend to consume lesser fruits and vegetables as compared to vegetarians as reported.2 Female athletes are estimated to meet at least 12 percent body fat to meet general health requirements, so they are more likely to follow vegetarian diet as a measure to achieve an optimal body weight.3 An extreme calorie restriction among female athletes may lead to have a negative impact on vitamins and minerals status leading to greater risk of amenorrhea and disordered menstrual cycles.4 Studies have shown that poor performance and early fatigue are due to deficiencies in major nutrients, whereas excessive intake can impair performance resulting in undesirable increase in body’s adipose tissue. The potential health benefits of a vegetarian diet have been reported with regard to non-athletes. However, it might be relevant to consider the benefits of a vegetarian diet with regards to the athlete and weather performance can be improved or compromised in any ways.
Materials and Methods
Selection of subjects
One hundred and twenty subjects, including 60 vegetarians and 60 non-vegetarians belonging to 16-25 years of age group were selected from Punjab Agricultural University and Guru Nanak Stadium, Ludhiana.
Development of interview schedule
The required data collected through personal interview technique using the especially structured schedule was pertaining to various aspects as general, socio-economic status, family composition of the subjectswere collected.
Dietary Survey
Dietary survey was carried out to obtain the information regarding the dietary pattern and food habits. Detailed information on the food intake was obtained using 24 hour recall method for three consecutive days. The nutrient intake was calculated by using Indian Nutritive Software Diet Cal-A5 for dietary assessment and planning.
Anthropometric Measurements
Various anthropometric measurements viz. height, weight, waist & hip circumference and triceps skinfold thickness were collected using standard methods.6 Based on the measurements, Body Mass Index (BMI) and Waist/Hip ratio was calculated.
Estimation of hemoglobin (Hb)
Blood samples of all the sportspersons were collected and hemoglobin was got analyzed from Punjab Agricultural University Hospital Laboratory by using cyanmethemoglobin method.7
Statistical Analysis
Collected data was statistically analyzed by calculation of means, standard deviation and percentage distribution.
Results and Discussion
General profile
Majority of the subjects i.e. males as well as females belonged to the nuclear family, which is further evident from the number of family members also i.e. majority of the subjects belonged to families having less than 4 members (Table 1). It was revealed that 58.4 percent males and 63.4 percent females belonged to the high income group. Junk food was being consumed by 48.4percent of males and 70 percent of females. It was further observed that skipping of meals was more prevalent among females as compared to that among males i.e. 51.6 percent of females used to skip their meals as compared to 38.4 percent of males which might be due to the reason that female athletes are more conscious about their body looks.
Table 1: General Profile of the subjects (N=120)
| Characteristics | Males (n=60) | Females (n=60) |
| Family size | ||
| Nuclear | 48(80) | 43(71.6) |
| Joint | 12(20) | 17(28.3) |
| Family Composition | ||
| Small(<4) | 44(73.3) | 22(36.6) |
| Medium (4 to 8) | 16(26.7) | 37(61.6) |
| Large(>8) | 0 | 1(3.3) |
| Family income (Rs/Annum) | ||
| Low (upto 50,000/-) | 1(3.3) | 0 |
| Medium (50,000-2,50,000/-) | 24(40) | 22(36.6) |
| High (>2,50,000/-) | 35(58.4) | 38(63.4) |
| Junk Food | ||
| Yes | 29(48.4) | 42(70) |
| No | 31(51.6) | 18(30) |
| Skipping Meals | ||
| Yes | 23(38.4) | 31(51.6) |
| No | 37(61.6) | 29(48.4) |
Anthropometric Measurements
The anthropometrical characteristics are one of most influential factors in determining good athletic performance besides other physiological characteristics.8
Data regarding anthropometric measurements of the subjects has been presented in Table 2, which revealed that there was not any significant difference in the height, weight and body mass index (BMI) of vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects of both the genders. Similarly, no significant differences in height, weight and lean body mass in vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects has been reported.9
Table 2: Anthropometric measurements of the subjects (N=120)
|
Parameters |
Males | Females | ||||
| Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) | t-value | Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) |
t-value |
|
| Height (mts) | 1.7±0.05 | 1.7±0.07 | 1.6NS | 1.6±0.04 | 1.6±0.06 | 0.9NS |
| Weight (kg) | 69.8±11.3 | 73.2±9.4 | 1.2NS | 50.2±4.7 | 52.7±6.6 | 1.6* |
| BMI | 22.7±3.3 | 23.1±2.8 | 0.5NS | 19.6±1.7 | 20.2±2.8 | 0.9NS |
| Waist (inch) | 32.6±2.4 | 33.6±2.3 | 1.7* | 28.1±2.1 | 29.3±2.7 | 1.9* |
| Hip (inch) | 36.2±2.9 | 37.9±2.9 | 2.1* | 32.2±2.5 | 33.9±2.8 | 2.5* |
| W/H ratio | 0.9±0.02 | 0.9±0.03 | 0.6NS | 0.9±0.04 | 0.9±0.02 | 0.4NS |
| Triceps skinfold | 7.5±2.7 | 8.8±3.1 | 1.6NS | 9.8±1.8 | 9.8±2.0 | 0.1NS |
Values are Mean ± SD
*Significant at 5percent level
NS – Non-significant
However, a statistically non-significant difference was observed in the waist and hip circumference of vegetarian and non-vegetarian males as well as females.
Classification According To Body Mass Index (Bmi)
The Body Mass Index (BMI) defined as weight (kg) / height (m2) is used to assess the nutritional status of adults. The classification of subjects based on Body Mass Index has been presented in and Fig. 1. The findings revealed that only 6.7 percent and 3.4 percent of vegetarian and non-vegetarian males were underweight having BMI less than 18.5 Kg/m2, whereas 40 percent and 30 percent of vegetarian and non-vegetarian females were in the category of being underweight.
 |
Figure 1: Classification of subjects according to BMI (N=120) Click here to View figure |
Among vegetarian males 36.6 percent and 46.7 percent of non-vegetarian males were in the normal category (18.5-22.9) while 43.3 percent of vegetarian and 66.6percent of non-vegetarian females was in the normal category of Body Mass Index. Among females subjects of vegetarian and non-vegetarian category, the prevalence of risk of obesity and obesity of grade I was very less when compared to the male counterparts, which might be due to the reason that the females are more figure conscious.
The BMI of the athletes with good fitness was found to be closer to normal levels but higher than the ones with average or poor status, as higher weight among the athletes with good fitness indicates more lean muscle mass and not necessarily body fat.10 Observational studies indicate that the weight or body mass index of prevalence of obesity ranged from 0-6 percent of vegetarian and from 5.45 percent in non-vegetarians.11
Biochemical picture
Among the biochemical parameters, haemoglobin levels of the selected subjects were determined to assess the difference between that of vegetarian and non vegetarian sportspersons.
Hemoglobin level of the subjects
As depicted in Table 4.3, haemoglobin level of non-vegetarian category of both the genders was higher as compared to vegetarians. However, the difference was statistically non significant. It has also been reported9 that haemoglobin concentration of non-vegetarian was higher than vegetarian sportspersons. Higher the concentrations of hemoglobin in blood, greater will be the capacity of the system to carry oxygen to cells and tissues.
Table 4.3: Hemoglobin level of the subjects (N=120)
| Parameters | Males | Females | ||||
| Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) | t-value | Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) | t-value | |
| Hemoglobin(mg/100 ml) | 13.2±1.5 | 13.7±1.5 | 1.3 NS | 11.2±1.3 | 11.2±1.3 | 0.9NS |
Values are Mean ± SD
NS-Non-significant
Food Intake of the Subjects
As evident from the Table 4, intake of cereals grains & products was found to be higher among vegetarian males as well as females, as compared to their non-vegetarian counterparts and differences were statistically significant (p≤0.05). However, the percent adequacy of cereals, grains and products was very less as compared to Suggested Dietary Intakes given by NIN.12 Similarly, study have also reported that intake of cereals was ten percent deficit among female athletes of 18-23 years of age.Intake of pulses & legumes was comparatively higher among vegetarian males and females as compared to their non-vegetarian counterparts.13 Similar results regarding a significantly higher daily intake of pulses and legumes by male and female vegetarians than their non-vegetarian counterparts have been reported.14
Consumption of milk and milk products was significantly (p≤0.05) higher among vegetarian males as compared to non-vegetarian males. Similarly, it was higher among vegetarian females as compared to non-vegetarian females but the difference was statistically non-significant. The reason for such higher intake of milk and milk products is consumption of 2-4 glasses of milk per day by the selected athletes.
As evident from the data, consumption of fats and edible oils was found to be higher among non-vegetarian category. Overall consumption of fats and oils was higher in males as compared to females. The higher amount of fats and oils was contributed by the daily consumption of paranthas and additional butter in the diets of majority of female subjects as reported.15 Also, the non-vegetarian food items add to the excess fat intake in case of non-vegetarian subjects. Further, the data was collected in winters, which is the time to consume more fats traditionally in the Indian sub-continent, especially in Punjab state.The percent adequacy of consumption of fruits was found to be higher among vegetarian category as compared to non-vegetarians (Table 4). Similarly, a study found a higher intake of fruits and vegetables in both male and female vegetarians compared with omnivorous.16 Overall consumption of vegetables including that of leafy, other vegetables and roots & tubers was higher among vegetarian males and females as compared to non-vegetarian category. Although, consumption of sugars was found to be higher among non-vegetarian subjects but the differences were statistically non-significant. Similarly, authors have also reported non-significant difference in consumption of sugars and sweets between vegetarians and non-vegetarians.17 Often sportsperson consume more table sugar in milk and more of energy drinks which have good quantity of sugar so as to increase the glucose level during their workout.
Table 4: Daily average food intake (g) by the subjects (N=120)
| Food groups | MALES | FEMALES | |||||
| SDI# (g) | Veg | Non-veg | t-value | Veg | Non-veg | t-value | |
| (n=30) | (n=30) | (n=30) | (n=30) | ||||
| Cereals grains & products | 550 | 339.5± 87.1 | 281.1± 54.8 | 3.1* | 272.3± 40.4 | 243.9± 41.3 | 2.7* |
| Pulses & legumes | 80 | 65.8± 30.2 | 34.9± 26.1 | 1.4NS | 65.5± 21.2 | 27.6± 12.9 | 1.4NS |
| Milk & milk products | 750 | 1327.8± 530 | 1077.3± 147.1 | 2.5* | 944.8± 162.5 | 879± 325.3 | 0.9NS |
| Fats & edible oils | 75 | 43.1± 5.7 | 45.3± 7.4 | 1.2NS | 33.3± 9.7 | 36.4± 7.2 | 2.3* |
| Fruits | 150 | 288.8± 201.7 | 169± 149.3 | 2.6* | 326.3± 125.3 | 293± 126.1 | 1.0NS |
| Leafy vegetables | 150 | 72.4± 37.7 | 51.9± 33.8 | 1.4NS | 65.7± 7.0 | 48.4± 0 | 2.3* |
| Other vegetables | 200 | 83.6± 48 | 59.8± 19.2 | 2.5* | 62.9± 25.4 | 60.7± 25.3 | 0.3NS |
| Roots & tubers | 150 | 84.5± 18.9 | 75.7± 12.2 | 2.07* | 71.7± 56.04 | 64.9± 19.9 | 0.6NS |
| Sugars | 80 | 45.3± 5.4 | 46.8± 8.7 | 0.8NS | 37.6± 9.1 | 38.1± 7.1 | 1.06NS |
| Fish, meat & poultry | – | 0 | 213.9±131.5 | – | 0 | 154.02±73.02 | – |
Values are Mean ± SD
SDI#: Suggested Dietary Intakes by NIN (2007)
*Significant at 5percent level
NS-Non-significant
Table 5: Percent adequacy of food intake by the subjects (N=120)
| Food groups | MALES | FEMALES | ||
| Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) | Veg(n=30) | Non-veg(n=30) | |
| Cereals grains & products | 60.5 | 52 | 49.4 | 44.2 |
| Pulses & legumes | 81.2 | 42.5 | 81.2 | 34.5 |
| Fats & edible oils | 57.3 | 60.4 | 44.4 | 48.5 |
| Fruits | 192 | 112.7 | 217.5 | 195.3 |
| Leafy vegetables | 48.7 | 34.6 | 43.8 | 32.3 |
| Milk & milk products | 176.9 | 143.6 | 126 | 117.2 |
| Other vegetables | 41.8 | 29.9 | 31.4 | 30.3 |
| Roots & tubers | 56.4 | 50.5 | 47.8 | 43.3 |
| Sugars | 56.6 | 58.5 | 47 | 47.6 |
Nutrient Intake of the Subjects
The average daily energy consumption of non-vegetarian males and females was found to higher as compared to vegetarian sportsperson. Furthermore, the percent adequacy in both the categories was not meeting the RDAs (Table 6). Similarly, a study also reported a lower energy intake of vegetarians than that by non-vegetarians, confirming the fact that generally, energy intake by vegetarians ranged from 5-22 percent lower than that of non-vegetarians.18 The percent adequacy of protein intake was higher in non-vegetarian as compared to vegetarian sportspersons. However, the protein intake was lesser as compared to the RDAs in all the categories of sportspersons and the differences were statistically significant (p≤0.05) between vegetarian and non-vegetarian category. The protein intake was also found to be higher in non-vegetarians as compared to vegetarians and lacto vegetarians.9 However, it has been suggested that because of the lower digestion of plant proteins, the protein requirement of vegetarian should be significantly higher than those of non-vegetarians.19
Table 6: Daily average nutrient intake of the subjects (N=120)
| NUTRIENTS | Males | Females | ||||
| Veg | Non-veg | t-value | Veg | Non-veg | t-value | |
| (n=30) | (n=30) | (n=30) | (n=30) | |||
| Energy (Kcal) | 3271.7±747.2 | 3450.2±519.8 | 1.0NS | 2950.9±438.9 | 3011±274 | 0.6NS |
| Protein (g) | 95.4±25.4 | 112.7±20.7 | 2.8* | 72.5±8.2 | 83.8±15.8 | 3.0* |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 389.9±85.6 | 379.9±69.8 | 0.5NS | 346.4±36.6 | 320.9±50.6 | 2.2* |
| Fat (g) | 86.2±34.4 | 98.5±23.3 | 1.6NS | 85.1±21.4 | 86.5±13.8 | 0.3NS |
| Iron (mg) | 28.8±5.2 | 32.5±5 | 0.5NS | 26.1±3 | 29.1±2.8 | 3.09* |
| Calcium (mg) | 2321.8±903.7 | 2060.5±403.7 | 1.4NS | 1681.4±330.2 | 1546.5±638.1 | 1.02NS |
| Phosphorous (mg) | 2386±726.9 | 2271.1±401.7 | 0.7NS | 1702.8±243.5 | 1717.6±402.4 | 0.1NS |
| Beta – Carotene (µg) | 2688.1±466.9 | 2279.3±480.7 | 4.8* | 2216.8±662.6 | 1913.9±880.8 | 1.5NS |
| Vitamin A (µg) | 545±279.9 | 570.8±156.1 | 0.4NS | 388.4±142.1 | 412.1±116.5 | 0.7NS |
| Folic Acid – Total (µg) | 190.9±72.9 | 177.2±45.7 | 0.9NS | 143.4±39.9 | 134±38.8 | 0.9NS |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 95.7±43.2 | 81.6±30.9 | 1.4NS | 123±60.4 | 97.6±56.3 | 1.7* |
| Total Dietary Fibre (g) | 21.7±4.1 | 23.6±5.7 | 1.3NS | 26.7±3.5 | 27±3.32 | 5.1* |
Values are Mean ± SD
*Significant at 5percent level
NS-Non-significant
Table 7: Percent adequacy of nutrient intake by subjects (N=120)
| NUTRIENTS | Males | Females | |||
| RDA# | Veg(n=30) | Non-veg (n=30) | Veg (n=30) | Non-veg (n=30) | |
| Energy (Kcal) | 4500 | 72.7 | 76.7 | 65.5 | 67 |
| Protein (g) | 160 | 59.6 | 70.4 | 45.3 | 52.4 |
| Fat (g) | 120 | 71.8 | 82.1 | 71 | 72.1 |
| Iron (mg) | 60 | 48 | 54.2 | 43.5 | 48.5 |
| Calcium (mg) | 2000 | 116.1 | 102 | 84.1 | 77.3 |
| Beta – Carotene (µg) | 4800 | 56 | 47.9 | 46.9 | 39.9 |
| Vitamin A (µg) | 600 | 90.8 | 95.1 | 64.7 | 68.7 |
| Folic Acid – Total (µg) | 200 | 95.4 | 88.6 | 71.7 | 67 |
| Vitamin C (mgs) | 40 | 239.2 | 204 | 307.5 | 244 |
# Recommended Dietary Allowances for Indians by NIN (2007)
Fat is the most concentrated source of energy. The percent adequacy of fat intake ranged between 71 to 82.1 which was quiet good as compared to the RDAs. Similarly, a study have also reported that percent adequacy of fat intake was more than 150 percent among vegetarian and non-vegetarian boys and girls.15
There was a statistically significant difference (p≤0.05) between vegetarian and non-vegetarian females regarding iron intake but it was non-significant among vegetarian and non-vegetarian males, the values being 28.8 and 38.5mg for vegetarian and non-vegetarian males and 26.1 and 29.1mg for vegetarian and non-vegetarian females, respectively. Similar results i.e. higher intake of iron by non-vegetarian sportspersons have been reported.9 The authors have also reported that iron deficiency anemia appears to be uncommon among non-vegetarian than vegetarian sportspersons.20
Average daily consumption of calcium was higher in vegetarian males and female sportspersons as compared to the non-vegetarian ones. But, the differences were statistically non-significant. Such high calcium intake might be due to more consumption of milk and milk products in the daily diet by the subjects under study. A study have also reported higher intake of calcium among lacto-vegetarians (p≤0.01) than vegetarians and non-vegetarians9
Average daily intake of b-Carotene was higher in vegetarian males and females as compared to the non-vegetarian counterparts of both the sexes. However, intake of b-Carotene was quiet less as compared to the RDAs of 4800 µg per day. Such lower intake of b-Carotene might be due to very low consumption of green leafy and other vegetables in their diets. However, higher adequacy of b-Carotene intake ranging from 104 to 153 percent for vegetarian and non-vegetarian boys and girls has been reported.15
A statistically non-significant difference was observed regarding average daily intake of Vitamin A among vegetarian and non-vegetarian categories of both the sexes. However, percent adequacy (Table 7) was found to be higher among non-vegetarian males and females as compared to their vegetarian counterparts.
Percent adequacy of folic acid intake was found to be higher among vegetarian subjects as compared to the non-vegetarian ones. A study has also reported that vegetarians normally consume more folic acid that meat eaters.21 Adequacy of Vitamin C was found to be quiet high i.e. ranging from 204 to 307.5 percent among all the categories. However, consumption was higher among vegetarian subjects as compared to the non-vegetarian counterparts. Such high consumption of Vitamin C might be due to more consumption of lemon, lemon water, coconut water and various seasonal fruits in their daily diet.
Conclusion
In present study, the vegetarian and non-vegetarian sportspersons (males as well as females) were found to consume a very low amount of various food groups and nutrients as compared to the Suggested Dietary Intake and Recommended Dietary Allowances given by NIN.12 However, a non-significant difference regarding their anthropometric profile was observed with relation to the dietary pattern i.e. whether vegetarian or non-vegetarian.
Through a well balanced diet concentrating on nutrient dense and protein rich foods, vegetarians can consume all required nutrients in sufficient amounts, leading to optimal health and athletic performance. Hence, it can be concluded that vegetarianism can be an equally healthy alternative for sportspersons.
Acknowledgements
We would like to extend our sincerest thanks to all the athletes in the Punjab Agricultural University University and Guru Nanak Stadium, Ludhiana who inspite of their busy schedule, agreed to participate in the study and for their cooperation in the fulfillment of this work. We would also like to thank Head, Department of Food and Nutrition, PAU, Ludhiana for providing various facilities in completion of this work.
References
- Fraser G E. Vegetarian diets: What do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases. Amer J ClinNutr. 2009;89:1607-12.
CrossRef - Wang Y and Beydoun M A.The obesity epidemic in the United States-gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiologic Rev. 2007;29:6-28.
CrossRef - Ducher G, Turner A I, Kukuljan S, Pantano K J, Carlson J L, Williams N I and De Souza M J. Obstacles in the optimization of bone health outcomes in the female athlete triad. Sports Medicine. 2011;41:587-607.
CrossRef - Beals K A and Hill A K. The prevalence of disordered eating, menstrual dysfunction, and low bone mineral density among US collegiate athletes.Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metabolism 2006;16:1-23.
CrossRef - Kaur G. Diet Cal-A tool for dietary assessment and planning. 2014, AIIMS, New Delhi.
- Jelliffe D B. The Assessment of Nutrition status of the Community.World Health Organisation. Monograph series no. 53, 1966, Geneva: 50-84.
- Ranganathan and Gunasekaran N. Simple method for estimation of hemoglobin in human blood using color analysis. J. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 2006;10:657-662
CrossRef - Adikhari A, Nahida P, Islam R N and Kitab A. Importance of anthropometric characteristics in athletic performance from the perspective of Bangladeshi National level athletes performance and body type. Am J Sports Sci Med. 2014;4:123-127.
- Khanna G L, Lal P R, Kommi K and Chakraborty T.A comparison of a vegetarian and non-vegetarian diet in Indian female athletes.J ExerSci Physiotherapy. 2006. 2:27-34.
- Mani U, Kadakia K, Gautam C and Mani I. Situational analysis of female athletes.Ind J NutrDietet. 2010. 47:252-59.
- Johnston P K and Sebate J. Nutritional implications of vegetarian diets: Diet and Nutrition in health of populations. pp. 1638-52. Modern Nutrition in health and Disease., 2007, Tenth Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, London.
- Nutrition and Hydration Guidelines for Excellence in Sports Performance.Sports authority of India. 2007;40.
- Vasanthamani G and Anuradha D. Impact of pre-game sports drink on the performance of athletes. Ind J Nutr Dietet. 2011;48:93-98.
- Larsson C and Johansson G. Prevalence of vegetarians and their nutrient intake in Swedish secondary school children.Scand J Nutr. 2002;41:117-20.
- Batra I.Nutritional profile of vegetarian and nonvegetarian school children. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. 2009.
- Donovan U M and Gibson R S. Dietary intakes of adolescent females consuming vegetarian, semi-vegetarian and omnivorous diets.J Adoles Health. 1996;18:292-300.
CrossRef - Haddad E H, Berk L S, Keltering J D, Hubbard R W and Peters W R. Dietary intake and biochemical, hematological and immune status of vegans compared with non-vegetarians. Am J ClinNutr. 1999;70:586-93.
- Kennedy E T, Bowman S A, Spence J J. Popular diets : Correlation to health, nutrition and obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;101:411-20.
CrossRef - Messina V K and Mangels A R. ADA Reports : Vegetarian Diets. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:661-69.
CrossRef - Batra I and Grover K. Assessment of physical and academic performance of vegetarian and nonvegetarian school girls.Ind J NutrDietet. 2011;48:399-407.
- Bala K. Vegetarian foods : Powerful for health. Citied from: file://G:\veg foods. htm Accessed on. 2008.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
