Close

Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science - An open access, peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of Nutrition and Food Science

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

A Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Household Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Stunting and Non-Stunting Toddlers

Iseu Siti Aisyah1,3 , Ali Khomsan2*, Ikeu Tanziha2 and Hadi Riyadi2

1Nutrition Science, Department of Community Nutrition, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.

2Departement of Community Nutrition, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.

3Departement of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, Siliwangi University, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia.

Corresponding Author E-mail: khomsanali@apps.ipb.ac.id

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.12.1.36

Article Publishing History

Received: 01 Feb 2024

Accepted: 09 Apr 2024

Published Online: 15 Apr 2024

Plagiarism Check: Yes

Reviewed by: Luzviminda Rivera

Second Review by: Agus Hendra Al Rahmad

Final Approval by: Dr. Jiwan S. Sidhu

Article Metrics

Views  

PDF Download  PDF Downloads: 348
Abstract:

Background: Stunting, wasting, and underweight are growth disorders in children under 5 years of age due to malnutrition in Indonesia. The level of macronutrient intake is a risk factor that directly influences stunting and wasting. Food insecurity is associated with poverty, malnutrition, and hunger.
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze food and nutritional insecurity in households with stunting and non-stunting toddlers, using a multivariate model.
Method: This study used a comparative cross-sectional design. Using the Lemeshow formula, 142 samples were obtained from a population of 822 children under five. Food insecurity was measured using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), diversity using IDDS, and macronutrient intake using 2x24-hour food recall. Stunting, wasting, and underweight were measured based on anthropometry. Bivariate analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Food insecurity, energy intake, protein intake, carbohydrate intake, underweight, and maternal nutritional knowledge had a significant relationship with the incidence of stunting in toddlers. These results also showed that the underweight variable was the most dominant cause of stunting because it had the highest OR value of 18.572. The OR value showed that underweight toddlers were 18.572 times more likely to have a stunting nutritional status.
Conclusions: Toddlers categorized as underweight face an 18.572 times higher likelihood of experiencing stunting in their nutritional status.

Keywords:

Household Food Insecurity; Food Diversity; Food Intake; Stunting

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Aisyah I. S, Khomsan A, Tanziha I, Riyadi H. A Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Household Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Stunting and Non-Stunting Toddlers. Nutr Food Sci 2024; 12(1). doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.12.1.36


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Aisyah I. S, Khomsan A, Tanziha I, Riyadi H. A Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Household Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Stunting and Non-Stunting Toddlers. Nutr Food Sci 2024; 12(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/3UdyCAV


Introduction

Globally, an estimated 148.1 million children under 5 years old were stunted, representing 22% of this age group. Additionally, another 45.4 million children under five, or 6.8% of the population, were classified as wasted. The study also revealed that Asia and Africa had the highest rates of child stunting, at 52% and 43% respectively.1 In Southeast Asia, children under 5 years old are disproportionately affected by malnutrition. Stunting prevalence in this subregion is the second highest in Asia with sufficient data, reaching 27.4%.  Wasting is also more common in Southeast Asia, affecting 8.2% of children under five, exceeding the global average of 6.7%.2 Chronic malnutrition in children, often worsened by frequent illnesses, infections, and unhealthy environments, can lead to stunting. This condition is linked to delays in developing motor skills and reaching their full intellectual potential.3,4 Indonesia is currently facing the problem of malnutrition. Stunting, wasting, and underweight are growth disorders in children under five years of age due to malnutrition or malnutrition. Based on the results of basic health research in 2018, the prevalence of stunting problems among toddlers was 30.79%, the prevalence of wasting was 10.19%, and the prevalence of underweight was 17.68%.5 Based on the Indonesian National Nutrition Status Survey results in 2019, the prevalence of stunting was 27.7%; in 2021, it was 24.4%, while in 2022, stunting in under five children experienced a decrease of 2.8%, so that the stunting rate in 2022 was 21.6%. There are 18 provinces with high prevalence (30-40%), and according to 2021 SSGI data, the prevalence of stunting in West Java Province has reached 24.5%, slightly above the national average stunting rate of 24.4%.6

Stunting is a condition of failure to thrive in children under five years of age due to chronic malnutrition, especially in the first 1,000 days of life.7 A lack of nutritional intake causes failure to thrive in children under five for a long time and the occurrence of recurrent infections, which are influenced by inadequate parenting patterns, especially in the first thousand days of life. Wasting is an important health problem because it is closely related to the incidence of mortality and morbidity due to acute malnutrition, which is characterized by significant weight loss (WAZ).8 The level of intake of macro-and micronutrients is a risk factor that directly influences stunting and wasting is the level of intake of macro and micronutrients.9

Household food insecurity is increasingly recognized as a global health problem, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and ASEAN.10,11 ASEAN countries face constraints in terms of limited agricultural resources and land degradation, which pose significant challenges to food production and sustainability.11 Food insecurity is an important, but often overlooked, factor that affects people’s health. Individuals who are food insecure are susceptible to illnesses due to micronutrient deficiencies. Food insecurity is associated with poverty, malnutrition, and hunger. Hunger is an uncomfortable or painful sensation that is caused by insufficient food intake. The lack of adequate nutrition is caused by poverty.12 To date, no study has simultaneously measured chronic and hidden hunger and its relationship with household food insecurity in Indonesia. This study aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the problem. Indonesia faces a significant challenge in addressing hunger and malnutrition. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the extent of the problem of hunger and malnutrition in Indonesia. This study is novel in its approach to measuring chronic and hidden hunger simultaneously and its focus on the relationship between hunger and food insecurity at the household level. The findings of this study will be of significant value to the government, policymakers, and other stakeholders working to address hunger and malnutrition in Indonesia.

Objective

Therefore, it is important to understand the relationships between these variables. This research aims to analyze a multivariate model of food insecurity at the household level and chronic hunger among stunted and non-stunted children in the city of Tasikmalaya.

Method

This study used a comparative cross-sectional study design. The population in this study was toddlers aged 2-5 years in the Karanganyar sub-district, Kawalu District, as the area with the highest prevalence of stunting (26.42%) had 822 toddlers. The sample size was determined using the Lemeshow formula (1991) and 68 people for the stunting group and 68 people for the non-stunting group, respectively. Thus, a total of 136 people (+10% dropout) were included, so the total number of samples needed was 142. Proportional stratified random sampling was used. Inclusion Criteria: 1) Respondents are mothers with toddlers; 2) Is a toddler in healthy condition; 3) Stunting toddlers for the first group and non-stunting toddlers for the comparison group; 4) Willing to become a research respondent by signing informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Toddlers experiencing infectious diseases, such as: diarrhea, typhus, tuberculosis, fever, at the time of data collection.

The data collected included socioeconomic characteristics, food insecurity, macronutrient intake, food diversity, parenting patterns for toddlers, access to health services, and anthropometric data (wasting, underweight, and stunting). Food insecurity at the household level was measured using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) questionnaire.13,14 Data on respondents’ food intake were collected through interviews with respondents using the 2 × 24 h food recall method. Data on parenting patterns of toddlers were measured using a parenting style questionnaire adopted from CEBU-RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta. This questionnaire has been used in research by Masita et al. (2018)15 and has been tested for validity and reliability. Data on access to health services were measured using a questionnaire consisting of 4 questions containing distance, travel time, and ease of transportation 16. Food diversity intake data were measured using the IDDS (Individual Dietary Diversity Score) method with the help of a 24-hour recall form. Body weight was measured using Omron brand scales with an accuracy of 0.1 kg for two repetitions. For height, a Metritis brand stadiometer was used.

Data analysis consisted of data preparation, editing, and cleaning. The data preparation consisted of building a file structure for data entry. Data editing will be performed if there is a discrepancy between the contents of the questionnaire and the data entry file. Data cleaning was performed using the extreme data. Quantitative data were processed and analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Descriptive analysis included the following: (1) basic statistical estimates (mean and standard deviation) for all quantitative variables and (2) estimate proportions for all categorical variables. Univariate analysis was used to describe the frequency distribution of independent variables, dependent variables, and descriptions of respondent characteristics. Bivariate (non-parametric) analysis is used to answer Objective 3, namely, testing the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable using the chi-square test or Fisher Exact Test/Continuity Correction because it uses categorical data. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors that influenced the determinants of stunting.

Results

Table 1: Frequency Distribution of Mother and Toddler Characteristics (n=142).

Variables

n

%

Toddler Ages (month)

24 – 35

49

34.5

36 – 47

54

38.0

48 – 59

39

27.5

Gender

Male

68

47.9

Female

78

52.1

The first child

 

 

Yes

34

23.9

No

108

76.1

Mother’s Age (Years)

17 – 25 (late teens)

22

15.5

26 – 35 (early adulthood)

63

44.4

36 – 45 (late adulthood)

47

33.1

> 45 (elderly)

10

7.0

Mother’s Education

 

 

Didn’t finish elementary school

1

0.7

Elementary school

69

48.6

Junior high school

42

29.6

Senior high school

30

21.1

Family Income

Low (< MSE)

98

69.0

High (≥ MSE)

44

31.0

 

Table 1 shows that more toddlers are aged 36 – 47 months (38%). Most of the toddlers were female (52.1%). More often than not, toddlers are not their first children (76.1%). Most toddlers did not have a history of worms (97.9%). Based on the characteristics of the mother’s age, the majority is in the range of 26 – 35 years which is included in the early adulthood category (44.4%). The highest number of mothers’ last education was elementary school (48.6%), with the highest income level being low income or below the minimum wage (69%).

Table 2: Bivariate Analysis Nutritional Status Toddler (Stunting and Non-Stunting)

Variables

Toddler

Total

P Value

OR

(95% CI)

Stunting

Non-Stunting

n

 (%)

n

 (%)

n

 (%)

Food Insecurity

 

1

Vulnerable

23

59

16

41

39

100

0,007

2

Moderate vulnerable

36

58,1

26

41,9

62

100

3

Secure

12

29,3

29

70,7

41

100

Food Diversity

 

1

Low

23

71,9

9

28,1

32

100

0,016

2

Medium

26

41,3

37

58,7

63

100

3

High

22

46,8

25

53,2

47

 

Energy Intake

 

1

Less

49

59

34

41

83

100

0,029

2

Normal

12

33,3

24

66,7

36

100

3

More

10

43,5

13

56,5

23

100

Carbohydrate Intake

 

1

Less

47

59,5

32

40,5

79

100

0,019

2

Normal

9

30

21

70

30

100

3

More

15

45,5

18

54,5

33

100

Protein Intake

 

1

Less

22

66,7

11

33,3

33

100

0,029

2,449

(1,083-5,540)

2

Normal

49

45

60

55

109

100

Fat Intake

1

Less

43

60,6

28

39,4

71

100

0,042

2

Normal

10

40

15

60

25

100

3

More

18

39,1

28

60,9

46

100

Access Health Services

1

Difficult

18

75,0

6

25,0

24

100

3,679

1,364

(1,364-9,927)

2

Easy

58

44,9

65

55,1

118

100

Wasting Status

1

Yes

9

64,3

5

35,7

7

100

0,260

2

No

62

48,4

66

51,6

135

100

Underweight Status

1

Yes

27

87,1

4

12,9

31

100

0,000

10,278

(3,365-31,402)

2

No

44

39,6

67

60,4

111

100

Mother’s Parenting Style

1

Not Good

22

75,9

7

24,1

29

100

0,004

 

4,105 (1,622-10,387)

2

Good

49

43,4

64

56,6

113

100

Mother’s Nutrition Knowledge

1

Not Good

61

55,5

49

44,5

110

100

0,027

2,736

(1,186-6,323)

 

2

Good

10

31,3

22

68,8

32

100

 

Table 2 shows that the most food insecurity falls into the moderately vulnerable category (27.5%). The secure category is (28.9%), while the vulnerable category is (27.5%). Most food diversity falls into the medium category (44.4%). The high category was (33.1%), while the low category was (22.5%). Most toddlers have low energy intake (58.5%). Based on carbohydrate intake, most were in the deficient category (55.6%), fat intake in the deficient category was (50%), and protein intake was mostly in the normal category (88%).

Logistic regression modeling was carried out to determine the most dominant variables associated with the incidence of stunting in toddlers, which was carried out in stages:

Selection of Model Candidates

The selection of candidate variables included in the model was carried out using bivariate analysis of each independent variable and dependent variable. Variables were entered into variable modeling with a p-value of ≤ 0.25.

Table 3: Results of Bivariate Analysis of Independent Variables with Dependent Variables.

Variables

P value

Multivariate Candidate

Food Insecurity

0,007

Included in modeling

Food Diversity

0,016

Included in modeling

Energy Intake

0,029

Included in modeling

Fat Intake

0,042

Included in modeling

Carbohydrate Intake

0,019

Included in modeling

Protein Intake

0,047

Included in modeling

Access Health Services

0,014

Included in modeling

Wasting

0,441

Not included in the modeling

Underweight

0,000

Included in modeling

Mother’s Parenting Style

0,004

Included in modeling

Mother’s Nutrition Knowledge

0,027

Included in modeling

 

Based on Table 3, food insecurity, food diversity, energy intake, fat intake, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, underweight, maternal parenting patterns, and maternal nutritional knowledge are included in the multivariate model.

Multivariate Modeling of Factors Causing Stunting Events

The variables included in the candidate model were then analyzed simultaneously with the dependent variable. Variables with a p-value > 0.05 will be removed in stages starting from the variable with the largest value so that the variables that will enter the next model are variables with a p-value ≤ 0.05.

Table 4: Results of Multivariate Model Analysis of Stunting Incidence

No

Variables

Multivariate Model 1

Multivariate
Model 2

Multivariate Model 3

Multivariate Model 4

1

Food insecurity

0,034

0,034

0,026

0,024

2

Food diversity

0,580

0,569

3

Energy intake

0,518

0,384

0,356

4

Fat Intake

0,731

5

Carbohydrate intake

0,077

0,077

0,064

0,023

6

7

Protein Intake

Access Health Services

0,235

0,085

0,135

0,074

0,134

0,056

0,139

0,060

8

9

Underweight

Mother’s parenting style

0,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

0,000

10

Mather’s nutritional knowledge

0,089

0,088

0,092

0,068

 

Based on the analysis of the four models in table 4, an explanation of the factors related to the incidence of stunting: Food insecurity appears consistently as a significant risk factor for stunting across all models. Toddlers in food insecure households are more likely to experience stunting. Underweight is also a significant factor in Models 1 and 3, suggesting a link between a mother’s nutritional status and her child’s growth. Mother’s parenting style emerges as a significant factor in Models 1, 3, and 4, highlighting the potential influence of parenting practices on child development. Food diversity, energy intake, protein intake, access to health services, and mother’s nutritional knowledge (included in Model 2) did not show a significant association with stunting in this study. This may be due to specific characteristics of the population studied or require further investigation. Carbohydrate intake appears significant in Model 4, but not in others. This inconsistency warrants further exploration

Table 5: OR Changes

Variables

Exp(B) 1

Exp(B)2

OR Changes

Food insecurity

Food diversity

Energy intake

Fat Intake

Carbohydrate intake

Protein Intake

Access Health Services

Underweight

Mother’s parenting style

Mother’s nutritional knowledge

1,891

1,189

1,238

1,107

1,650

1,969

2,954

11,264

7,479

2,556

1,892

1,195

1,298

1,650

2,149

3,052

11,391

7,567

2,567

0,056

0,503

4,841

-0,031

9,149

3,312

1,121

1,175

0,443

 

Final Model Preparation

Table 6: Final Model of Multivariate Analysis of Stunting Incidents in Toddlers.

No

Variables

β

p-value

aOR

95% CI

1

Food Insecurity

0,002

2

Energy Intake

0,020

3

Protein Intake

-2,196

0,009

0,111

0,022-0,571

4

Carbohydrate intake

0,005

5

Underweight

2,922

0,000

18,572

4,617-74,715

6

Mother’s nutritional knowledge

1,475

0,008

4,373

1,459-13,101

 

Based on Table 6, it is known that the variables food insecurity, energy intake, protein intake, carbohydrate intake, underweight, and maternal nutritional knowledge have a significant relationship with the incidence of stunting in toddlers. These results also showed that the underweight variable was the most dominant cause of stunting because it had the highest OR value of 18.572. The OR value showed that underweight toddlers were 18.572 times more likely to have a stunting nutritional status.

Discussion

Poverty and food insecurity are basic determinants of malnutrition, including stunting. At the household level, food insecurity, poor parenting patterns, unhealthy environments, and lack of access to health services are direct causes that are influenced by basic causes, and in turn, influence direct causes at further levels. Many factors influence the food insecurity of Sub-Saharan African households, whose pattern is almost the same as in Indonesia, namely the gender of the head of the household; age, educational status, household size, income, poverty and food prices are the main determining factors proven to influence household food security status and cause malnutrition in children.17 It is generally understood that food insecurity is related to several factors, namely the unavailability of food in sufficient quantities of appropriate quality, lack of access to nutritious food, lack of clean water, poor environmental sanitation, and inadequate access to health services.18,19

Immediate causes at the next level are inadequate food intake, infections, and diseases that can affect food utilization. All these factors ultimately determine an individual’s nutritional status and the extent to which they suffer adverse health impacts from chronic or hidden hunger. The main factor in the occurrence of stunting in toddlers is inadequate nutritional adequacy in the long term, which is exacerbated by infectious diseases that occur continuously.20 Disturbed linear growth can be caused by the body’s adaptation to low intake, resulting in inadequate nutritional adequacy, which can then disrupt the body’s metabolism and hamper cell or tissue formation.21

Energy and protein consumption are factors that directly influence the nutritional status of toddlers. A continuous lack of energy and protein intake can cause a decrease in the body’s immunity and damage to the mucosa, which can lead to several disease incidents.22 Inadequate food intake associated with skipping meals and increased nutritional requirements in children aged 5 years are the reasons for the high chance of disease in this group.23 Body health can be influenced by the level of nutrient consumption in food with high-quality dishes. The quality of the dish shows the respective amounts of all nutrients, so that the quality and quantity will lead to the best nutritional health conditions and adequate consumption. On the other hand, inadequate consumption can have an adverse impact, causing a decline in health and malnutrition, and can affect a person’s nutritional status, so it can have implications for underweight nutritional status in toddlers.24

Nutrient consumption can affect the nutritional status of toddlers.25 Toddlers with sufficient levels of energy and protein consumption and meeting the body’s needs will have good nutritional status, while toddlers with low energy and protein intake will have an impact on chronic energy deficiencies and protein energy deficiencies that will occur. Barriers to the growth and cognitive development of toddlers. An imbalance in the level of consumption of macronutrients such as energy, carbohydrates, fat, and protein to the body’s needs over a long period of time can influence changes in tissue and body mass which will result in weight loss (underweight) and if the low consumption level lasts for a long time it will increase the risk of stunting.26,27

Underweight in children might indicate a nutritional problem that reflects both wasting and stunting.28 Stunting, which is based on a child’s height and age, is a measure of chronic nutritional deficiency. Wasting, which is based on a child’s weight and height, is a measure of acute nutritional deficiency. Underweight, based on weight and age, is a composite measure of both the acute and chronic status. Nutritional deficiencies are complex and can have several adverse effects including stunted growth.29 Food insecurity, underweight, and the mother’s parenting style are important factors that can influence a child’s growth and development.30–32 Comprehensive interventions to address stunting and wasting need to consider these factors. Mothers play an important role in preventing stunting in childhood, especially during the “golden phase”. This phase begins even before conception and continues throughout the child’s early development. Focusing on a mother’s nutrition before pregnancy helps prepare her body for optimal fetal development during pregnancy and remains important for a child’s growth throughout infancy, toddlerhood, and adolescence.33 Social, economic, and food assistance (such as the Family Hope Program, Non-Cash Food Assistance, Food Fortification Program, and Community-Based Total Sanitation Program) from the government is one of the efforts to prevent food insecurity and stunting.34–37 However, there are still some challenges that need to be addressed to improve the effectiveness of the program.

However, there were limitations to the study, particularly in the assessment of food intake variables. The respondents had difficulty answering and remembering the food or drinks consumed by their children, especially in converting the amount of food consumed from household size to grams. However, the researchers still tried to maintain the validity of the data by using a conversion tool to convert household size to grams.

Conclusion

Variables such as food insecurity, energy intake, protein intake, carbohydrate intake, underweight status, and maternal nutritional knowledge were significantly associated with the prevalence of stunting among toddlers. Among these, underweight emerged as the most influential factor contributing to stunting, as evidenced by its highest Odds Ratio (OR) value. Toddlers categorized as underweight face an 18.572 times higher likelihood of experiencing stunting in their nutritional status. It is recommended that the government take proactive measures to enhance food security across regions, ensuring that households have consistent access to ample food supply. This initiative aims to enable individuals to fulfill their energy, carbohydrate, and protein requirements. Moreover, there is a need to enhance maternal nutritional knowledge to prevent toddlers from experiencing underweight. If left unaddressed over the long term, underweight conditions can lead to stunting of toddlers.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Tasikmalaya City Health Service, Kawalu Community Health Center for permission to conduct research and guidance. The authors also thank the study participants and their parents. Thank you we convey to Neys-van Hoogstraten Foundation and Bogor Agricultural Institute which has funded this research with Funding & quot; Research Grant Proposal Inter-University Collaboration Program in Food and Nutrition Security” with contract Number 02/NHF-IPB/2022 dated 17 February 2022.

Funding Sources

Neys-van Hoogstraten Foundation and Bogor Agricultural Institute which has funded this research with Funding “Research Grant Proposal Inter-University Collaboration Program in Food and Nutrition Security” with contract Number 02/NHF-IPB/2022 dated 17 February 2022.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contribution

Iseu Siti Aisyah: research concept, collecting data, and writing the research results section.

Ali Khomsan: research concept, drafting the manuscript, and writing the discussion section.

Ikeu Tanziha: research concept, analyzing data, and writing method section.

Hadi Riyadi: research concept, interpreted the data, and translated the manuscript into English

Ethics Statement

This research has received approval from the IPB University Ethical Commission with number: 855/IT3.KEPMSM-IPB/SK/2023.

References

  1. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund (‎UNICEF)‎, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates: key findings of the 2023 edition. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund (‎UNICEF)‎, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; 2023. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240073791
  2. Global Nutrition Report. Country Nutrition Profiles – South-eastern Asia. Global Nutrition Report; 2018. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://globalnutritionreport.org/resources/nutrition-profiles/asia/south-eastern-asia/
  3. Lukman TNE, Anwar F, Riyadi H, Harjomidjojo H, 1. Responsive Prediction Model of Stunting in Toddlers in Indonesia. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal. 2022;10(1):302-310.
    CrossRef
  4. Wondimagegn ZT. Magnitude and Determinants of Stunting Among Children in Africa: A Systematic Review. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal. 2014;2(2):88-93.
    CrossRef
  5. Kemenkes Republik Indonesia. Basic Health Research Results in 2018. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2019.
    CrossRef
  6. Badan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Results of the 2022 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey. Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2022:154. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://kesmas.kemkes.go.id/assets/uploads/ contents/attachments/ 09fb5b8ccfdf088080f 2521ff0b4374f.pdf
  7. Prendergast AJ, Humphrey JH. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014;34(4):250-265. doi:10.1179/2046905514Y.0000000158
    CrossRef
  8. Andina E, Madinar M, Achadi E. Fulfilment of Minimum Acceptable Diet as Dominant Factor in Wasting in Children Aged 6–23 Months in Central Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019. Indonesian Journal of Public Health Nutrition. 2021;1(2):32-39. doi:10.7454/ijphn.v1i2.4761
    CrossRef
  9. Abri N. Identification of Socio-Demographic Factors with the Incidence of Stunting in Elementary School Children in Rural Enrekang. Journal of Health and Nutrition Research. 2022;1(2):88-94. doi:10.56303/jhnresearch.v1i1.20
    CrossRef
  10. Gassara G, Lin Q, Deng J, Zhang Y, Wei J, Chen J. Dietary Diversity, Household Food Insecurity and Stunting among Children Aged 12 to 59 Months in N’Djamena—Chad. Nutrients. 2023;15(3):573. doi:10.3390/nu15030573
    CrossRef
  11. Sundram P. Food security in ASEAN: progress, challenges and future. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1260619
    CrossRef
  12. FAO. Hunger and food insecurity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2008. Accessed January 18, 2024. http://www.fao.org/hunger/en/
  13. Sheikomar OB, Dean W, Ghattas H, Sahyoun NR. Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) for Use in League of Arab States (LAS) and Characteristics of Food Insecure Individuals by the Human Development Index (HDI). Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5(4):nzab017. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab017
    CrossRef
  14. FAO. Sustainable food systems: Concept and framework. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf
  15. Masita M, Biswan M, Puspita E. Mother’s Parenting Patterns and Toddler Nutritional Status. Quality : Jurnal Kesehatan. 2018;12(2):23-32.
    CrossRef
  16. Kemenkes Republik Indonesia. Basic Health Research 2013: Research Report. Balitbangkes Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2013.
  17. Drammeh W, Hamid NA, Rohana AJ. Determinants of Household Food Insecurity and Its Association with Child Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of the Literature. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal. 2019;7(3):610-623.
    CrossRef
  18. Engle-Stone R, Ndjebayi AO, Nankap M, Killilea DW, Brown KH. Stunting prevalence, plasma zinc concentrations, and dietary zinc intakes in a nationally representative sample suggest a high risk of zinc deficiency among women and young children in Cameroon. J Nutr. 2014;144(3):382-391. doi:10.3945/jn.113.188383
    CrossRef
  19. Militao EMA, Salvador EM, Uthman OA, Vinberg S, Macassa G. Food Insecurity and Health Outcomes Other than Malnutrition in Southern Africa: A Descriptive Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5082. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095082
    CrossRef
  20. de Onis M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(Suppl 1):12-26. doi:10.1111/mcn.12231
    CrossRef
  21. Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Alaaraj N, et al. Early and Long-term Consequences of Nutritional Stunting: From Childhood to Adulthood. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(1):e2021168. doi:10.23750/abm.v92i1.11346
  22. Michael H, Amimo JO, Rajashekara G, Saif LJ, Vlasova AN. Mechanisms of Kwashiorkor-Associated Immune Suppression: Insights From Human, Mouse, and Pig Studies. Front Immunol. 2022;13:826268. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.826268
    CrossRef
  23. Okafor AMA, Ikwumere CM, Egumgbe UD, Eze CB, Obitulata CG. Prevalence and Determining Factors of Stunting among School-Aged Children in a Rural Nigerian Community: A Cross-Sectional Study. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal. 2021;9(2):409-422.
    CrossRef
  24. Rahim FK. Risk Factors for Underweight Toddlers Aged 7-59 Months. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2014;9(2):115-121. doi:10.15294/kemas.v9i2.2838
  25. Arini HRB, Hadju V, Thomas P, Ferguson M. Nutrient and Food Intake of Indonesian Children Under 5 Years of Age: A Systematic Review. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2022;34(1):25-35. doi:10.1177/10105395211041001
    CrossRef
  26. Diniyyah SR, Nindya TS. Energy, Protein and Fat Intake with Incidence of Malnutrition in Toddlers Aged 24-59 Months in Suci Village, Gresik. Amerta Nutrition. 2017;1(4):341-350. doi:10.20473/amnt.v1i4.2017.341-350
    CrossRef
  27. Palinggi M, Rau MJ, Buchair NH, Jannah AR, Rahmania, Sirata MFD. Factors Associated with Decreasing Incidence of Stunting in the Working Area of the Palu Health Center. Journal of Health and Nutrition Research. 2023;2(1):27-32. doi:10.56303/jhnresearch.v2i1.107
    CrossRef
  28. Asmare AA, Agmas YA. Determinants of coexistence of stunting, wasting, and underweight among children under five years in the Gambia; evidence from 2019/20 Gambian demographic health survey: application of multivariate binary logistic regression model. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1621. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14000-3
    CrossRef
  29. Rah JH, Melse-Boonstra A, Agustina R, van Zutphen KG, Kraemer K. The Triple Burden of Malnutrition Among Adolescents in Indonesia. Food Nutr Bull. 2021;42(1_suppl):S4-S8. doi:10.1177/03795721211007114
    CrossRef
  30. Betebo B, Ejajo T, Alemseged F, Massa D. Household Food Insecurity and Its Association with Nutritional Status of Children 6–59 Months of Age in East Badawacho District, South Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2017;2017:e6373595. doi:10.1155/2017/6373595
    CrossRef
  31. Oumer A, Fikre Z, Girum T, Bedewi J, Nuriye K, Assefa K. Stunting and Underweight, but not Wasting are Associated with Delay in Child Development in Southwest Ethiopia. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2022;13:1-12. doi:10.2147/PHMT.S344715
    CrossRef
  32. Lanjekar PD, Joshi SH, Lanjekar PD, Wagh V. The Effect of Parenting and the Parent-Child Relationship on a Child’s Cognitive Development: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30574. doi:10.7759/cureus.30574
    CrossRef
  33. Saleh A, Syahrul S, Hadju V, Andriani I, Restika I. Role of Maternal in Preventing Stunting: a Systematic Review. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2021;35:S576-S582. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.087
    CrossRef
  34. Muhtar M, Pudjianto B, Habibullah H. Social approach to stunting prevention in Blora, Central Java, Indonesia. Simulacra. 2022;5(2):13-28. doi:10.21107/sml.v5i2.15909
    CrossRef
  35. Chandra P. The Contribution of The Family Hope Program In Reducing The Stunting Rate In Children In Kampar District, Riau Province. Ensiklopedia of Journal. 2022;4(3):272-281. doi:10.33559/eoj.v4i3.333
    CrossRef
  36. Dewi NU, Mahmudiono T. Effectiveness of Food Fortification in Improving Nutritional Status of Mothers and Children in Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2133. doi:10.3390/ijerph18042133
    CrossRef
  37. Ningsih DF, Ikhtiar M, Baharuddin A. Community-Led Total Sanitation (CTLS) to Prevent Stunting among Toddlers in Indonesia. Journal of Aafiyah Health Research (JAHR). 2021;2(2):22-32. doi:10.52103/jahr.v2i2.706


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.