Introduction
The complementary feeding period represents a delicate dietary transition due to the immaturity of the child’s digestive system 1. Therefore, exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for the first six months of the child’s life 2, followed by the introduction of nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods to supplement breast milk to ensure optimal infant growth and health 3. Dietary diversification necessarily begins with solid foods in a liquid or semiliquid form (porridge, juice, puree) because of the absence of a solid dental apparatus combined with the fragility of the infant’s digestive tract. In Burkina Faso, porridges, in general, are widely consumed by children, and a large proportion are traditional porridges 4. However, most traditional porridges consumed by children are low in energy density and therefore do not meet their protein, fat, and micronutrient needs 5. To compensate for the low nutrient content of traditional porridges, local production of infant flours to prepare more energy-dense porridges is increasingly present in the local market 6. Concerning these flours, equivalent of infant cereals in Western countries, specialized treatments (fermentation, germination) favoring the rupture of the glycosidic bonds of the starch should be applied to reduce the swelling rate and consequently increase their fluidity and energy density during cooking 7,8. However, limitations have been documented concerning the quality of local infant flours, which would negatively influence their optimal use 9,10. Some flours did not undergo any prior enzymatic treatment, others lacked vitamins or minerals, and others lacked essential protein sources, such as milk or legumes 11. The stomach volume of the child is minimal, approximately 30 ml/kg of body weight 12, so the consumption of a small amount of porridge is sufficient to make the child feel full. This situation gradually leads to nutrient deficiencies for the child’s normal growth 13. Therefore, the availability of locally produced infant flour of good nutritional quality would address one of the leading causes of malnutrition 14. In recent years, many locally produced infant flours have been marketed in Burkina Faso. However, very few studies have evaluated the contribution of locally produced infant flour to meeting standards for children’s food and nutritional needs 13,14, which motivated this study. The objective of this study was to evaluate the macronutrient adequacy of local infant flours sold in Ouagadougou for the dietary needs of children aged 6 to 23 months. The interest of the study is therefore to provide recent data on the quantitative composition of macronutrients and their contribution to the overall energy value of locally produced infant flours. The main focus of the study was the evaluation of essential physicochemical parameters and macronutrient compositions and the assessment of the adequacy of the nutritional composition to the dietary needs of children.
Materials and methods
Study site and period
Samples of local infant flour were collected from stores in the city of Ouagadougou from January to June 2022.
Sampling of infant flour
The sampling was carried out using the simple random method. Sixty representative samples of 500 g to 1000 g of different brands of local infant flour were collected from several productions. The samples were collected, randomly, coded, packed in boxes, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. Samples were taken under aseptic conditions.
Evaluation of nutritional parameters of infant flour
Fats were determined with the standard Soxhlet extraction method with hexane as a solvent according to the international ISO-6492 process 15.
Carbohydrates were determined with the spectrometric method of determination with sulfuric orcinol. Absorbances were read at 510 nm using a JENWAY 6715 UV/Vis spectrophotometer 16.
Total proteins (TP) were determined with the differential method of Egan et al. 17 according to the following formula:
TP (g) = 100 – [Sugar content (g) + Water content (g) + Fat content (g) + Ash content (g)]
The energy value (E) was calculated using the coefficients of Atwater et al. 18 according to this formula:
E (kcal/100g)= [carbohydrate content (g) *4 (kcal) + protein content (g) * 4 (kcal) +fat content (g) * 9 (kcal)]
Modeling the contribution of local infant formula macronutrients to total energy
The calculation of the percentage of the contribution of each macronutrient towards the total energy intake was performed in Excel 2016 software using the macronutrient composition of each sample, the dietary needs of the children aged 6 to 23 months 19, and the energy equivalence of each macronutrient through the coefficients of Atwater et al. 18. The results obtained were compared with the recommended daily allowances described by certain authors in the literature.
Data processing
The data were entered into Excel 2016 software for the calculation of averages and mean deviations. The contributions of each macronutrient to the overall energy value were also calculated using Excel 2016.
Results
Raw material composition of local infant flours
A total of 20 brands of flour from different productions were sampled (Table 1). The primary raw materials were cereals found in 100% (20/20) of formulations, legumins used in 70% (14/20) of formulations and oilseeds incorporated in 85% (17/20) of formulations. Concerning the use of cereals, corn was used in 60% (12/20) of formulations and millet in 30% (6/20) of formulations. Regarding the use of legumins, soybean was found in 55% (11/20) of formulations and cowpea in 20% (4/20). About oilseeds, peanuts were used in 85% (17/20) of formulations and sesame in 5% (1/20) of formulations. As for fortifying ingredients, minerals and vitamins were present in 60% (12/20) of formulations, iodized salt in 85% (17/20) of formulations, pain de singe in 25% of formulations, palm oil in 15% of formulations and Moringa in 5% of formulations. Concerning ingredients for improving taste, texture, flavor and digestibility, sugar was present in all formulations, enzymes in 30% of formulations, milk in 25% of formulations, cassava in 5% of formulations, yeast in 5% of formulations and vanilla in 5% of formulations.
Table 1: Raw material composition of infant’s flours and main treatments
Brand name |
Code |
Composition in raw materials |
Treatments |
Natavie |
F1 |
Millet, sorghum, peanut, soybean, sugar, pain de singe, iodized salt, vitamins and minerals complex, amylase BAN 800MG |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Kasona Plus |
F2 |
Millet, soybean, peanut, iodized salt, sugar |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Kid Food Blé |
F3 |
Rice, wheat, peanut, sugar, iodized salt |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Kids Lac |
F4 |
Millet, milk, peanut, sugar, iodized salt |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Kid Food Maïs |
F5 |
Corn, cassava, peanut, sugar, iodized salt, cookies |
Sorting, washing, roasting corn and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, and packaging |
Vitazom |
F6 |
White corn, peanut, soybean, cowpea, sugar, vanilla, iodized salt, vitamins and minerals complex, amylase BAN 800MG |
Sorting, washing, roasting corn and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Fanutri Sorgho |
F7 |
Sorghum, soybean, peanut, pain de singe, sugar, iodized salt, minerals and vitamins, amylases enzymes |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Kids Food Non Sucré |
F8 |
Corn, cassava flour, peanut, sugar, iodized salt, cookies |
Sorting, washing, roasting corn, mixing ingredients, grinding, sieving and packaging |
Ya Noogo Standard |
F9 |
Yellow corn, sorghum, peanut, cowpea, rice, sugar, iodized salt |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Ya Noogo Moringa |
F10 |
Yellow corn, sorghum, peanut, cowpea, rice, sugar, iodized salt, Moringa |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Ya Noogo Baobab |
F11 |
Yellow corn, sorghum, peanut, cowpea, rice, sugar, iodized salt, pain de singe |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving and packaging |
Fanutri Maïs |
F12 |
Corn, soybean, peanut, pain de singe, sugar, iodized salt, minerals and vitamins, amylases enzymes |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Vita Casui Biscuité |
F13 |
Corn, wheat, palm oil, sugar, milk, yeast, vitamins and minerals |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, cooking, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Vita Casui Instantané |
F14 |
Millet, palm oil, sugar, milk, vitamins and minerals |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals, mixing ingredients, grinding, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Vitaline Instantané |
F15 |
Yellow corn, sugar, peanuts, soybean, milk, vitamins and minerals |
Sorting, washing, mixing ingredients, cooking-extrusion, cooling, grind into powder, sieving, enrichment and packaging |
Super Léo |
F16 |
Yellow corn, soybean, sugar, milk, palm oils, iodized salt, vitamins and minerals |
Sorting, washing, mixing ingredients, cooking-extrusion, cooling, grind into powder, sieving, enrichment and packaging |
Petit Gourmet Maïs |
F17 |
White corn, peanut, soybean, sugar, sesame, iodized salt, vitamins and mineral complex, amylase BAN 800MG |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grinding, cooking, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Fanutri Céréales |
F18 |
Cereals, soybean, peanuts, pain de singe, sugar, iodized salt, minerals and vitamins, amylases enzymes |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Maam Binré Complet |
F19 |
Corn, millet, rice, tiger nuts, soybean, peanut, sugar, vitamins and minerals, iodized salt |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Misola |
F20 |
Millet, soybean, peanut, iodized salt, sugar, vitamins and minerals complex |
Sorting, washing, roasting cereals and legumins, mixing ingredients, grind into powder, sieving, enriching and packaging |
Evaluation of nutritional parameters of infant flour
The nutritional characteristics evaluated were fats, carbohydrates, proteins and energy value of infant flour (Table 2). Fats contents varied from 6.16g± 0.05 to 16.76g± 0.04, with an average of 11.85g while total proteins contents ranged from 6.18 ± 0.25g to 22.08 ± 0.17g, with an average of 15.64g. Carbohydrates contents varied from 63.4g ± 0.52 to 70.96g ± 0.36, with a mean of 66.82g. In terms of calorific value, the values ranged from 406.02 kcal/100g ± 0.12 to 458.92 kcal/100g ± 0.1, with an average of 436.47 kcal/100g. In general, proteins, fats and carbohydrates were high and could be explained by the use of carbohydrate-rich local cereals and protein- and fat-rich legumes.
Table 2: Nutritional characteristics of infant flour
Samples |
Fats (g) |
Proteins (g) |
Carbohydrates (g) |
Calorific values (kcal/100 g) |
F1 |
12.5±0.04 |
14.64±0.42 |
67.15±0.43 |
439.66±0.12 |
F2 |
10.62±0.02 |
18.39±0.53 |
65.98±0.7 |
433.06±0.13 |
F3 |
6.18±0.03 |
22.08±0.17 |
65.52±0.26 |
406.02±0.12 |
F4 |
6.16±0.05 |
21.5±0.45 |
66.44±0.57 |
407.2±0.32 |
F5 |
8.07±0.01 |
16.77±0.21 |
70.26±0.31 |
420.71±0.06 |
F6 |
11.57±0.05 |
15.26±0.53 |
66.85±0.71 |
432.57±0.19 |
F7 |
13.74±0.03 |
10.73±0.42 |
69.26±0.58 |
443.62±0.14 |
F8 |
10.53±0.02 |
20±0.30 |
64.04±0.44 |
430.97±0.13 |
F9 |
16.38±0.02 |
6.18±0.25 |
70.96±0.36 |
456.02±0.11 |
F10 |
16.38±0.03 |
12.6±0.08 |
64.92±0.07 |
457.46±0.15 |
F11 |
16.76±0.04 |
7.29±0.52 |
69.73±0.69 |
458.92±0.1 |
F12 |
14.27±0.05 |
12.4±0.12 |
66.99±0.12 |
445.95±0.15 |
F13 |
11.12±0.05 |
19.87±0.17 |
65.7±0.25 |
442.36±0.13 |
F14 |
6.88±0.04 |
21.51±0.48 |
66.15±0.59 |
412.52±0.24 |
F15 |
7.27±0.04 |
19.58±0.45 |
67.32±0.5 |
413.03±0.16 |
F16 |
13.22±0.05 |
13.28±0.38 |
67.34±0.52 |
441.46±0.13 |
F17 |
12.4±0.03 |
17.07±0.48 |
66.24±0.59 |
444.88±0.2 |
F18 |
14.31±0.04 |
11.87±0.23 |
67.16±0.33 |
444.91±0.11 |
F19 |
12.82±0.04 |
18.61±0.34 |
63.4±0.52 |
443.42±0.08 |
F20 |
15.8±0.05 |
13.19±0.15 |
64.92±0.15 |
454.64±0.23 |
Mean |
11.85±3.47 |
15.64±4.66 |
66.82±1.99 |
436.47±16.66 |
Standard |
> 8.5* |
> 12.7* |
≥ 58.8** |
≥ 400** |
Values are presented as the means ± MSD (mean standard deviation).
*NBF 01-198 (2014) 20; **OMS/FAO (2006) 21.
In terms of evaluations (Fig. 1), 75% of the flours complied with the limits set by the Burkina Faso standard, while 25% of the flours were below the limits set by the standard concerning the fat content. Regarding protein content, 70% of flours complied with the limits set by the Burkina Faso standard, while 30% of flours were below the standard limits. In terms of the carbohydrate content and energy values, all flours complied with the limits set by national standards in Burkina Faso. Overall, only 45% of flours met all the requirements of the Burkina Faso standard.
Figure 1: Assessment of nutritional quality |
Modeling the contribution of local infant formula macronutrients to total energy
The results of the modeling show that the contribution of fats was between 13.61% and 32.87% while the contribution of proteins was between 5.42% and 21.75% (Table 3). The contribution of carbohydrates varied between 56.77% and 66.8% while the energy value was between 406.02 and 458.92 kcal/100g of porridge.
Table 3: Modeling energy intake by macronutrient
Samples |
Fats (%) |
Proteins (%) |
Carbohydrates (%) |
Energy values (kcal/100g) |
F1 |
25.59 |
13.32 |
61.09 |
439.66 |
F2 |
22.07 |
16.99 |
60.94 |
433.06 |
F3 |
13.7 |
21.75 |
64.55 |
406.02 |
F4 |
13.61 |
21.12 |
65.27 |
407.2 |
F5 |
17.26 |
15.94 |
66.8 |
420.71 |
F6 |
24.07 |
14.11 |
61.82 |
432.57 |
F7 |
27.88 |
9.67 |
62.45 |
443.62 |
F8 |
21.99 |
18.56 |
59.44 |
430.97 |
F9 |
32.33 |
5.42 |
62.24 |
456.02 |
F10 |
32.23 |
11.02 |
56.77 |
457.46 |
F11 |
32.87 |
6.35 |
60.78 |
458.92 |
F12 |
28.8 |
11.12 |
60.09 |
445.95 |
F13 |
22.62 |
17.97 |
59.41 |
442.36 |
F14 |
15.01 |
20.86 |
64.14 |
412.52 |
F15 |
15.84 |
18.96 |
65.2 |
413.03 |
F16 |
26.95 |
12.03 |
61.02 |
441.46 |
F17 |
25.09 |
15.35 |
59.56 |
444.88 |
F18 |
28.95 |
10.67 |
60.38 |
444.91 |
F19 |
26.02 |
16.79 |
57.19 |
443.42 |
F20 |
31.28 |
11.6 |
57.12 |
454.64 |
Recommended daily intake |
≥ 20a |
≥ 6b |
50-75c |
356-1028d |
a: OMS/FAO (2008) 22, b: WHO/FAO/UNU (2007) 23, c : Mann et al. (2007) 24, d: Trèche (2004) 25.
Overall energy values were within the energy limits recommended for complementary foods. However, the energy contribution of certain macronutrients to the overall energy value was below the recommendations. Evaluation of the energy contribution of each nutrient shows that 25% of infant flours had fat intakes below the recommended limits 22 (Table 4). As for the energy contribution of proteins, 5% of infant flours had proteins contribution below the recommended limits 23. However, overall, 75% of infant flour complied with the energy contribution of fats to total energy value, and 95% of infant flour complied with the contribution of total proteins to total energy value. In terms of carbohydrates, all infant flours complied with recommendations 24. By combining all nutritional criteria, 70% of local infant flours met recommendations 22-24.
Table 4: Evaluation of the compliance of the formulations of the local infant flour
|
Fats |
Proteins |
Carbohydrates |
Energy values |
Compliance rate (%) |
75 |
95 |
100 |
100 |
Intakes below the limit (%) |
25 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
Recommended Intake |
≥ 20a |
≥ 6b |
50-75c |
356-1028c |
a: OMS/FAO (2008) 22, b: WHO/FAO/UNU (2007) 23, c : Mann et al. (2007) 24, d: Trèche (2004) 25.
Discussion
The large number of local infant flour brands evaluated is greater than the number generally evaluated in the literature 26,27, which provides a broader view of these products in the city of Ouagadougou. The carbohydrates contents obtained in this study are satisfactory as all flours complied with the WHO standard 21. The values were close to those obtained in Côte d’Ivoire by Sika et al. (2019) 26, with a variation from 69.73% to 74.94% as well as those of Amoin et al. (2015) 7, with a variation from 67.8% to 69.20%. These satisfactory rates could be explained by the high use of cereals in the formulations. However, regarding fats contents and proteins contents, 25% and 30% of the flour respectively had contents below the limits set by the standards 20. The fats contents obtained in the present study are higher than those obtained previously in Burkina Faso in 2018, with contents ranging from 5.8g to 11.5g 10 and the values obtained in Côte d’Ivoire in 2016, with contents ranging from 3.76g to 9.64g 28. Regarding total proteins, the values obtained in this study were higher than those obtained by Dimaria et al. (2018) 10 in Burkina Faso, with values ranging from 8.5g to 16.6g and those obtained in Côte d’Ivoire, with values ranging from 7.01g to 15.57g 28. Energy values were also higher than those obtained in Côte d’Ivoire, with values ranging from 397.27 kcal/100g to 400.86 kcal/100g 26 but lower than those obtained by another study in Burkina Faso in 2016, with values ranging from 423.46 kcal/100g to 472 kcal/100g 27. The total energy requirements of children aged 6 to 23 months range from 749 to 1117 kcal per day 19. Breast milk provides around 217 kcal/day for children aged 6 to 8 months and 90 kcal/day for children aged 12 to 23 months in developing countries, with the remainder (356 kcal/day to 1028 kcal/day) provided by complementary foods 25. Modeling has shown that some of the infant flours evaluated had lower intakes than the recommended limits for energy requirements from each of the main macronutrients 22-24. This imbalance could be explained by a lack of knowledge of production, packaging and labeling guidelines for cereal-based infant flours by some local infant flour producers, and the lack of qualification of some production managers in local production companies. Indeed, some authors had already pointed to shortcomings in formulations resulting from the lack of essential qualifications of employees in certain infant flour production companies 6. As a result, there is low use of raw materials that are sources of fats and the low incorporation of additional fats. As for proteins, their contribution is quite interesting, with the high incorporation of legumes, which have contributed to a substantial increase in the energy contribution of proteins in the overall energy value. This high use of legumes could be partly explained by the high prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition, which varies between 12.1% and 32.2% in Burkina Faso, and which has guided NGO interventions in the field of infant flour formulation and child nutrition 29.
Conclusion
The carbohydrates contents and energy values were also within the standards for all the infant flours evaluated. However, for fats and proteins contents, 25% and 30% of infant flours respectively were below the limits set by the Burkina Faso standards. Modeling of the contribution of the different types of nutrients also showed that 30% of the local infant flours evaluated did not comply with the WHO recommendations. This study showed that local producers are making great efforts to have good quality products that meet the standards. However, the details show many shortcomings in the formulations of local infant flour. It is therefore in the interest of producers to improve their formulations by taking into account the available nutritional composition tables in compliance with the recommendations in this area.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. for their guidance and support to complete this article.
Funding Sources
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of Interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest.
References
- OMS. Alimentation du nourrisson et du jeune enfant. 2021:1-37. https://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding
- OMS. Nutrition de l’enfant et progrès accomplis dans la mise en œuvre du Code international de commercialisation des substituts du lait maternel. 2002:1-12. A55/14. https://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_ files/WHA55/fa5514.pdf
- Stewart CP, Iannotti I, Dewey KG, Michaelsen KF, Onyango AW. Contextualizing complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(2):27-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060785
CrossRef - Trèche S. Complementary foods in developing countries: Importance, required characteristics, constraints and potential strategies for improvement. In: P K, T H, eds P-C, eds. Proceedings of the International Colloquium promoting growth and development of under-fives. ITG Press 2002:132-148.
- Broin M. Fiche technique : Formulation de farines infantiles enrichies en poudre de feuilles de Moringa. 2006:1-3. http://www.moringanews.org
- Fanny O, Mouquet-Rivier C, Fioroni N, et al. La filière des farines infantiles produites localement dans 6 pays sahéliens. Burkina Faso, Mali, Mauritanie, Niger, Sénégal et Tchad. 2020:1-164. https://www.iram-fr.org/ouverturepdf.php?file=ird-rapportunicef-web150-complet-1602769912.pdf
- Amoin AKKA, Agbo EA, Dago AG, Gbogouri AG, Brou DK, Dago G. Comparaison des caractéristiques nutritionnelles et rhéologiques des bouillies infantiles préparées par les techniques de germination et de fermentation. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2015;9(2):944-953. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v9i2.31
CrossRef - Mouquet-Rivier C, Salvignol B, Van Hoan N, Monvois J, Trèche S. Ability of a very low cost extruder to produce Instant flours at a small-scale level in Vietnam. Food Chemistry. 2003;82(2):249-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00545-9
CrossRef - Colin A, Mouquet-rivier C, Boulle-Martinaud C, Kabore C, Lankoandé R, Soma A. Distribution, perception et consommation des farines infantiles à Ouagadougou et dans la province de la Gnagna au Burkina Faso. 2017:1-67. http://araa.org/pasanao/files/classified/gret_-_rapport_-_farines_infantiles_au_burkina_faso_-_2017.pdf
- Dimaria SA, Schwantz H, Icard-Vernière C, Picq C, Zagré NM, Mouquet-Rivier C. Adequacy of some locally produced complementary foods marketed in Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Senegal. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):785. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060785
CrossRef - Bougma S, Tapsoba F, Zio S, et al. Assessment of some feeding practices and the local infant flours’ consumption by children aged from 6 to 23 months in the city of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security (JNFS). 2022;
- Sawadogo PS, Martin-Prével Y, Savy M, Kameli Y, Traoré AS. Pratiques d’alimentation du nourrisson en zone rurale au Burkina Faso, (Province de la Gnagna): description et conséquences nutritionnelles. Presses Universitaires de Ouagadougou 2004:317-327.
- Trèche S. Les bouillies fluides, bébés bien nourris. Information pour le développement agricole des pays ACP. 2004.
- Trèche S, Mouquet C, Grongnet JF, Salvignol B. Dossier: Les farines infantiles. 1998:1-49.
- ISO 6492. Aliments des animaux – Détermination de la teneur en matière grasse. 1999. p. 1-9.
- Bachelier G, Gavinelli R. Dosage global des glucides du sol par les methodes colorimétriques à l’anthrone et a l’orcinol. Cah ORSTO/ti sér Pédol 1966;lV,3:97-103.
- Egan H, Kirk RS, Sawyer R, Pearson D. Pearson’s Chemical Analyses of Food. vol 8th edition. Medical division of Long group Ltd; 1981:591.
- Atwater WO, Benedict FG, Bryant AP, Milner R, Murrill P. Experiments on the metabolism of matter and energy in the human body, 1898-1900. Bulletin (United States Office of Experiment Stations). US Department of Agriculture; 1903:112.
CrossRef - Dewey KG, Brown KH. Update on technical issues concerning complementary feeding of young children in developing countries and implications for intervention programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2003;24:5-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650302400
CrossRef - NBF 01-198. Farines infantiles-spécifications. Burkina Faso: Agence Burkinabé de Normalisation, de la Métrologie et de la Qualité (ABNORM); 2014. p. 1-11.
- OMS/FAO. Rapport de la vingt-septième session du comité du codex sur la nutrition et les aliments diététiques ou de régime. Section A : Projet de norme révisée pour les préparations destinées aux nourrissons 2006.
- OMS/FAO. Consultation mixte d’experts FAO/OMS sur les graisses et les acides gras dans l’alimentation humaine. Programme mixte FAO/OMS sur les normes alimentaires: Genève. 2008.
- WHO/FAO/UNU. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. World Health Organization technical report series. 2007;(935):1-265, back cover.
- Mann J, Cummings JH, Englyst HN, et al. FAO/WHO Scientific Update on carbohydrates in human nutrition: conclusions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007;61(Suppl 1):S132–S137.
CrossRef - Trèche S. L’alimentation du jeune enfant dans les pays en développernent. 2004:
- Sika AE, Kadji BRL, Dje KM, Kone FTM, Dabonne S, Koffi-Nevry AR. Qualité nutritionnelle, microbiologique et organoleptique de farines composées à base de maïs (Zea mays) et de safou (Dacryodes edulis) produites en Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science. 2019;13(1):325-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.4314/ ijbcs.v13i1.26
CrossRef - Songré-Ouattara TL, Gorga K, Savadogo A, Bationo F, Diawara B. Evaluation de l’aptitude nutritionnelle des aliments utilisés dans l’alimentation complémentaire du jeune enfant au Burkina Faso. J Soc Ouest-Afr Chim. 2016;41:41-50.
- Elenga M, Tchimbakala M, Nkokolo SA. Amélioration de la qualité nutritionnelle des bouillies d’igname et leur efficacité chez les rats de souche wistar. Journal of Applied Biosciences. 2016;103:9819-9828. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jab.v103i1.4.
- MSHP. Enquête nutritionnelle nationale 2021. Rapport définitif. 2021:1-112.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.